This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
palacepat_1 Selhurst 07 Apr 16 2.32pm | |
---|---|
Was just reading through the sports news and noticed the current debate surrounding Formula 1 and the Qualifying rules being contested.. It appears the 'bigwigs' involved F1 fear that it's becoming predictable and too obvious for the viewer. So they experiment in order to keep an interest in the sport which is possibly dwindling? Along with others? Which led me to think about how many sports over the years have such a fluctuated audience and how many people still watch the same? With Fast car Eddie trying to claw Boxing back on the market compared to the hey-days of the 80's-90's.. Is there any sports that you watch now that you didn't before? Or has everyone just switched sports completely?
"Football is a bullshit world. Agents are nasty scum. They're evil and divisive and pointless. They only survive because the rest of the sport is so corrupt and because leading football club people employ their sons in the job." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Apr 16 2.42pm | |
---|---|
There's too much choice now. The Cup final used to be on TV for about 8 hours, as did test cricket or Formula 1 and if you didn't like it the other options were all s***. Not other sports that's for sure! Whereas now you could watch the F1 race or a football match, or golf, or cricket, or rugby or a million other things on demand. I used to only watch F1 live, now I'm happy to record it and watch it any time that day so long as I can avoid the result.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Apr 16 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palacepat_1
Was just reading through the sports news and noticed the current debate surrounding Formula 1 and the Qualifying rules being contested.. It appears the 'bigwigs' involved F1 fear that it's becoming predictable and too obvious for the viewer. So they experiment in order to keep an interest in the sport which is possibly dwindling? Along with others? Which led me to think about how many sports over the years have such a fluctuated audience and how many people still watch the same? With Fast car Eddie trying to claw Boxing back on the market compared to the hey-days of the 80's-90's.. Is there any sports that you watch now that you didn't before? Or has everyone just switched sports completely? Formula One is mind numbingly boring. Everyone knows it and the interested parties are trying desperately to promote it as something exciting.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Apr 16 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Formula One is mind numbingly boring. Everyone knows it and the interested parties are trying desperately to promote it as something exciting. The races have both been blinding this season. The only desperation is from the fans who liked the qualifying that we had, and that worked but Jean Todt refuses to let us go back to. Should never have been made head of the FIA either, he's a prick. It should've been Ari Vatanen who isn't a prick.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 07 Apr 16 3.16pm | |
---|---|
As Stuk says, so much choice now, both sport and channels. Frank Bough & Dickie Davies mainstays of Saturday afternoon TV
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Apr 16 3.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
As Stuk says, so much choice now, both sport and channels. Frank Bough & Dickie Davies mainstays of Saturday afternoon TV
Exactly. And if that week it happened to be horse racing, bowls or skiing etc. it was just tough luck.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eustace H. Plimsoll Aldershot 07 Apr 16 3.46pm | |
---|---|
I am always bemused as to why sports seem to have as a priority the constant need to ensure wider participation. Test cricket rocks. Twenty20 sucks ("cricket for people who don't like cricket".) (Alright, it doesn't suck - it's alright for whatever it is, I suppose, as a passing momentary distraction - but whatever it is, it is just not cricket.) Yet we need it to ensure test cricket won't die. Or so we are constantly told. Why will it die? Because no-one watches anything other than the A-list games. Okay. So?? What's up with letting those uninterested in test cricket have their fun elsewhere while I and my 40 like-minded friends enjoy some test cricket over here? At a tiny, tin-pot ground, ideal for our needs. Smashing. Or is sport validated as magnificent only when witnessed by hordes, irrespective of their genuine interest? Should interest and participation in top-level football fell to miserable levels - as it probably ought to, given its many huge flaws - would you stop following Palace? Will you stop following Palace when an inevitable further administration episode ends less well and we wnd up re-forming as a park team? You would?? Fair enough See ya. I'll be having larks over here with my mates. You enjoy your Twenty20. Everyone wins. And if all the sport becomes is is a lunch-time car-park kick-about because there isn't any funding, so f***ing what? Sounds marvellous to me. Why must we forego what we are - and enjoy being - to manufacture something we don't really want, simply to encourage a following we equally don't don't want? (I'll draw you a line between this and video-refereeing for anyone interested. Anyone...?? ANYONE??)
As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Apr 16 4.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eustace H. Plimsoll
I am always bemused as to why sports seem to have as a priority the constant need to ensure wider participation. Test cricket rocks. Twenty20 sucks ("cricket for people who don't like cricket".) (Alright, it doesn't suck - it's alright for whatever it is, I suppose, as a passing momentary distraction - but whatever it is, it is just not cricket.) Yet we need it to ensure test cricket won't die. Or so we are constantly told. Why will it die? Because no-one watches anything other than the A-list games. Okay. So?? What's up with letting those uninterested in test cricket have their fun elsewhere while I and my 40 like-minded friends enjoy some test cricket over here? At a tiny, tin-pot ground, ideal for our needs. Smashing. Or is sport validated as magnificent only when witnessed by hordes, irrespective of their genuine interest? Should interest and participation in top-level football fell to miserable levels - as it probably ought to, given its many huge flaws - would you stop following Palace? Will you stop following Palace when an inevitable further administration episode ends less well and we wnd up re-forming as a park team? You would?? Fair enough See ya. I'll be having larks over here with my mates. You enjoy your Twenty20. Everyone wins. And if all the sport becomes is is a lunch-time car-park kick-about because there isn't any funding, so f***ing what? Sounds marvellous to me. Why must we forego what we are - and enjoy being - to manufacture something we don't really want, simply to encourage a following we equally don't don't want? (I'll draw you a line between this and video-refereeing for anyone interested. Anyone...?? ANYONE??) No different to big business or an economy. They're all obsessed by growth. T20 and ODI cricket are needed to ensure test cricket doesn't die in India, pakistan, Windies etc. It's perfectly healthy in England, Australia, NZ, SA.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Apr 16 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
The races have both been blinding this season. The only desperation is from the fans who liked the qualifying that we had, and that worked but Jean Todt refuses to let us go back to. Should never have been made head of the FIA either, he's a prick. It should've been Ari Vatanen who isn't a prick. Sorry. You lost me after "The". Formula is not real racing. It is just a competition between car and engine manufacturers for promotional purposes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Apr 16 4.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Sorry. You lost me after "The". Formula is not real racing. It is just a competition between car and engine manufacturers for promotional purposes. Don't bring something up if you don't want to hear about it. Formula 1 is the pinnacle of motorsport driving and innovation. I know who the best drivers are, as I know more about the sport and the feeder formulae where they may have raced in cars with the same specs. Boring is reading comments from someone who clearly doesn't have a clue about it.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 07 Apr 16 5.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
As Stuk says, so much choice now, both sport and channels. Frank Bough & Dickie Davies mainstays of Saturday afternoon TV
Sunday roast then working off the calories with your mates in the street after this......... Happy days Edited by -TUX- (07 Apr 2016 6.10pm)
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 07 Apr 16 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Formula One and downhill skiing: the two things that everyone watches and hopes for a disaster to make it more entertaining
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.