This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Pussay Patrol 14 Dec 15 9.55pm | |
---|---|
Serious money to be earned !
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
suicideatselhurst crawley 14 Dec 15 11.11pm | |
---|---|
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
Theres someone in my head ... But its not me X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 15 Dec 15 8.41am | |
---|---|
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Jamesrichards8 15 Dec 15 8.45am | |
---|---|
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
When you’re knocked on your back and your life’s a flop... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Dec 15 9.56am | |
---|---|
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true. A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead. I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war. The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 15 Dec 15 11.42am | |
---|---|
He'd just do a "Greville Janner" and claim he had dementia (tried and tested politician's defence strategy) just after he had legally secured his financial assets for wife/family. More slippery than an eel.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Dec 15 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 15 Dec 2015 11.42am
He'd just do a "Greville Janner" and claim he had dementia (tried and tested politician's defence strategy) just after he had legally secured his financial assets for wife/family. More slippery than an eel. Probably true. I suspect he's inside the scope of 'reasonable doubt' - He'll probably have all the angles covered to avoid actually having to accept the consequences of his actions, and have a few 'fall guys' who'd take the blame. The c**t.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 15 Dec 15 12.46pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true. A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead. I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war. The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Dec 15 12.56pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 15 Dec 2015 12.46pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true. A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead. I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war. The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'
Would you admit to being a friend of a Capital radio DJ, even an ex I was just joking - of course its terrible that a mans reputation was dragged through the mud. That said, some of his behaviour whilst not the offence charged would arguably be considered 'questionable' and border on harassment, and it fell into an area where determination of whether it was an offence was uncertain. that said, the cases were regarded as believable and reliable, and pointed to events that had occurred but were not, actually criminal in the context. The CPS were right to prosecute, they had a reasonable ground for believing they could obtain a conviction, reliable witnesses etc. Its just sad that maybe people are more interested in scandal than absolution. Its like a Sun retraction, everyone remembers the headline on the front page, no one sees the retraction in the corner of page 15.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 15 Dec 15 1.31pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 12.56pm
Quote Stuk at 15 Dec 2015 12.46pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true. A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead. I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war. The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'
Would you admit to being a friend of a Capital radio DJ, even an ex I was just joking - of course its terrible that a mans reputation was dragged through the mud. That said, some of his behaviour whilst not the offence charged would arguably be considered 'questionable' and border on harassment, and it fell into an area where determination of whether it was an offence was uncertain. that said, the cases were regarded as believable and reliable, and pointed to events that had occurred but were not, actually criminal in the context. The CPS were right to prosecute, they had a reasonable ground for believing they could obtain a conviction, reliable witnesses etc. Its just sad that maybe people are more interested in scandal than absolution. Its like a Sun retraction, everyone remembers the headline on the front page, no one sees the retraction in the corner of page 15.
Once again the accusers simply walk away. I've said it before that both sides should have the option of anonymity, or neither. And I don't buy the argument that it encourages others to do so. Make your own complaint if it actually happened rather than thinking i'll jump on that bandwagon now everyone already thinks he's a nonce/bandit.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
suicideatselhurst crawley 15 Dec 15 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am
Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm
Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??
I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true. A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead. I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war. The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'
Theres someone in my head ... But its not me X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bright&wright 15 Dec 15 3.14pm | |
---|---|
It's funny how people genuinely believe Blair had a choice. Whoever is in charge does whatever the Yanks tell them to do.
'We are going to make a little bit of history here’ Mr. J. Ertl. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.