This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 06 Feb 23 3.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
I take your point but unfortunately there is a real disconnect now between private and public - maybe more so than ever before (which is saying something). I do understand your stance and I am not entirely arguing against it, especially your last point. I think what is interesting, as always, is to see just how far and how much Unions will push for and if this is not met, where that will leave the respective professions in terms of resource and therefore service. I do think it somewhat speculative however to suggest that all received full pay and some whilst not working, I am not sure on that so not denying the claim either, and that most are not suffering in any way. With regards to both wages and benefits, you can have both really and there is plenty of opportunity in the Private sector for this also, I can confirm for myself but not for all however. It's too much of a blanket statement and approach for me in terms of drawing a conclusion on the situation but again I fail to see it as a greedy, selfish or political move and more of an understandable attempt to receive reasonable pay given the status quo of the country. I accept this may not be the view of all so therefore content to just disagree/see differently.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 06 Feb 23 3.33pm | |
---|---|
I agree - to disagree Edited by The Dolphin (06 Feb 2023 3.33pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 06 Feb 23 3.37pm | |
---|---|
Absolutely fine
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 06 Feb 23 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
[Link] I suspect when most teachers joined they did not factor in that their pay in real terms would go down, and by so far. Could explain why so many leave so quickly. What a terrible waste. The cost of educating teachers and the ramp up costs of them becoming good teachers are lost due to not paying enough. For a halfpence of tar...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 07 Feb 23 7.33am | |
---|---|
I suspect that most leave because they didn't realise they would be working in a place where the tail wags the dog!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Feb 23 10.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I have been to a few court proceedings in my official capacity. Stirling is correct. I also had many dealings with Appeal adjudicators and believe me, they often took their personal view over factual evidence It’s not my experience. I have been involved in many cases over the years and am currently a witness in a fraud case which could see someone sent to prison for perverting the course of justice. Every Judge I have encountered has been scrupulously fair and applied only the law, leaving their personal beliefs on their doorstep.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 07 Feb 23 10.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It’s not my experience. I have been involved in many cases over the years and am currently a witness in a fraud case which could see someone sent to prison for perverting the course of justice. Every Judge I have encountered has been scrupulously fair and applied only the law, leaving their personal beliefs on their doorstep. Unless you are a lawyer I'm not sure you can say that with that degree of certainty. I have served on 2 jury's and as far as I can tell both judges were fair and unbiased. However both judges gave directions to the jury which was their interpretation of the law if you believe this then must must find for .... As neither counsels objected I must assume that the judge was correct and fair. In the case of the Colston statue the judge allowed the defence to produce an expert who gave the jury a 1 hour lecture on the history of slavery. Some legal experts queried whether this should have been allowed. You only find out on appeal. Edited by Badger11 (07 Feb 2023 10.46am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 07 Feb 23 11.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
This is probably in the wrong topic but I wasn't sure where to put it. Blimey.
As for Covid, many a time I still had to teach remotely. People who have never taught find it difficult to understand what a difficult, specialised, exhausting job it is. Indeed, when it was announced that schools were going back after Covid, you could almost hear a resounding cheer from parents across the land: Covid had reminded them that teaching young minds is not piece of p**s. When I started teaching 13 years ago the money I earned was vastly different to what it is now: in real terms, I've had 30% pay cut. That's ok is it? The support staff at my college, those who support staff in class - another highly specialised job- are being paid under the living wage. They are leaving in droves and the support department are desperately asking if anyone has friends or family who might be able to join in order to relieve the pressure on classrooms. It's like taking people off the streets - desperate. All these people may 'get your goat' but people who get my goat are those who pronounce without knowing what they're talking about. I think they should 'take a hike'. Sorry. Edited by Glazier#1 (07 Feb 2023 11.35am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 07 Feb 23 11.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Unless you are a lawyer I'm not sure you can say that with that degree of certainty. I have served on 2 jury's and as far as I can tell both judges were fair and unbiased. However both judges gave directions to the jury which was their interpretation of the law if you believe this then must must find for .... As neither counsels objected I must assume that the judge was correct and fair. In the case of the Colston statue the judge allowed the defence to produce an expert who gave the jury a 1 hour lecture on the history of slavery. Some legal experts queried whether this should have been allowed. You only find out on appeal. Edited by Badger11 (07 Feb 2023 10.46am) Usual nonsense and " look at me " narcissism. It's nonsense if for no other reason than how would someone possibly know what the judges' personal beliefs were.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 07 Feb 23 11.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Unless you are a lawyer I'm not sure you can say that with that degree of certainty. I have served on 2 jury's and as far as I can tell both judges were fair and unbiased. However both judges gave directions to the jury which was their interpretation of the law if you believe this then must must find for .... As neither counsels objected I must assume that the judge was correct and fair. In the case of the Colston statue the judge allowed the defence to produce an expert who gave the jury a 1 hour lecture on the history of slavery. Some legal experts queried whether this should have been allowed. You only find out on appeal. Edited by Badger11 (07 Feb 2023 10.46am) Usual nonsense and " look at me " narcissism. It's nonsense if for no other reason than how would someone possibly know what the judges' personal beliefs were. Fraud is a different crime to perverting the course of justice so that line doesn't make sense unless someone is charged with both and tried for both at the same time.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 07 Feb 23 11.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin Blimey.
As for Covid, many a time I still had to teach remotely. People who have never taught find it difficult to understand what a difficult, specialised, exhausting job it is. Indeed, when it was announced that schools were going back after Covid, you could almost hear a resounding cheer from parents across the land: Covid had reminded them that teaching young minds is not piece of p**s. When I started teaching 13 years ago the money I earned was vastly different to what it is now: in real terms, I've had 30% pay cut. That's ok is it? The support staff at my college, those who support staff in class - another highly specialised job- are being paid under the living wage. They are leaving in droves and the support department are desperately asking if anyone has friends or family who might be able to join in order to relieve the pressure on classrooms. It's like taking people off the streets - desperate. All these people may 'get your goat' but people who get my goat are those who pronounce without knowing what they're talking about. I think they should 'take a hike'. Sorry.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 07 Feb 23 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
[Link] What? the strikes are being politically motivated by the unions? But they can't go on strike without a ballot so it's not 'being forced'. If you're saying that those who are being 'forced' aren't in the union, then join the bloody thing and have your say, for goodness sake. Democratic.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.