I'm not sure that is such a thing as inherent behaviour where a choice is involved.

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

The awful crimes thrust upon poor Victorian children by white British types of the day must make us predisposed to such evil too if such a thing does exist within other nationalities.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

or like being asinine.Though no ethnic group holds a monopoly on either

It would be equally "nuts " to suggest IMO that all members of any given ethnicity living in this country are inherently more pre-disposed to engage in child abuse or to tolerate it.

Plenty of abusers got tolerated in plenty of societies at different times for various reasons (just look at the tolerance for the likes of Saville within "celeb" culture and the Beeb for decades).Take the Catholic Church as another example,or abuse in British children's homes.

We're not all on the same page indeed. There are abusers,those who turn a blind eye (many relatives of kids abused in families?many of those working in children's homes?) and those who abhor it.Its not an "inherent ethnic issue" other than for ethnophobes and perhaps some ethnocentrists.

As the CEOP (part of the National Crime Agency) put it in 2013:

"four key threats:

the proliferation of indecent images of children,
online sexual exploitation,
transnational child sexual abuse; and
contact child sexual abuse.

Other key findings show that approximately 190,000 UK children will suffer contact sexual abuse by a non-related adult before turning 18, with approximately 10,000 new child victims of contact sexual abuse being reported in the UK each year."

To the extent its "endemic", it knows no ethnic boundaries.Child sex abusers of all ethnicities are indeed all "on the same page".

Edited by legaleagle (23 Aug 2015 10.02pm)

Indeed slightly off kilter but same vein. I find it slightly amusing that there are guys in my neighbourhood from the Yemen who are quite happy to be sucking on bottle of bud & smoking cigarettes yet expect there wives to dress head to toe in a burqua

Pro USA & Israel

Well,it happens all the time it seems all over the UK by groups of people holding British nationality.Remember the Islington children's homes scandal and cover up? They were largely of British nationality,no?

I would say that you focus on certain (horrific) examples where a gang of predominantly (but not exclusively) people from one ethnic background (likely British nationality) have engaged in systematic child abuse.But you don't focus on other instances where the "gang" may be comprised of people of varying ethnicities or a single white British ethnicity. See link below about another group of child abusers active amongst other places,in Yorkshire convicted earlier this year, seemingly predominantly of a particular ethnicity.Police described the men as "monsters in disguise", working together to commit some of the most "vile and depraved" child sex offences the authorities have ever seen.

And see another link from last month of a group of abusers recently convicted in Wales.What ethnicity do you think it likely most of them are?

In the case of the instances you choose to focus on,taking Rotherham and Oxford as examples,in one instance police/social workers were criticised for being afraid of being called racist. I've already said in other posts I'm against racism or fear of being called a racist as being a factor in investigation and stopping child abuse.

In the Oxford example,it was found fear of being called racist played no part in the investigation fiasco at all;just plain incompetence and not taking kids seriously which,in my limited knowledge,is far more the usual case.

[Link]

[Link]

Edited by legaleagle (23 Aug 2015 10.34pm)