This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 2.27pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Aug 2015 9.01pm
Is someone directly calls you a racist, please hit the 'report thread to moderator', and I'll take a look, and discuss it with the other moderators. Similarly if anyone regards a post as directly racist, offensive or personal, report the thread and we'll take a look. Does that include Legaleagle continually implying and using various weasel word and phrases to indicate that people whose views he disagrees with are racists, without actually directly calling them that?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Aug 15 2.57pm | |
---|---|
'Xenophobic' is ok? Good. That's just an observation of an illness of the mind and not a slur.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Aug 15 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 2.57pm
'Xenophobic' is ok? Good. That's just an observation of an illness of the mind and not a slur.
A dislike of outsiders is in fact a very natural human reaction. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Aug 2015 3.10pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Aug 15 3.15pm | |
---|---|
Y Quote Stirlingsays at 23 Aug 2015 3.09pm
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 2.57pm
'Xenophobic' is ok? Good. That's just an observation of an illness of the mind and not a slur.
A dislike of outsiders is in fact a very natural human reaction. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Aug 2015 3.10pm)
Edited by Kermit8 (23 Aug 2015 3.15pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Aug 15 3.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 3.15pm
Edited by Kermit8 (23 Aug 2015 3.15pm)
Not liking outsiders is hardly a 'phobia' for the vast majority of people. Like racism the word xenophobic gets easily attributed to people who's ideas aren't shared in that area by their opponents......like the racism slur it's designed to close down debate.....Just a general point, I'm not accusing you of that Kermy It's like people calling Farage xenophobic when he has a German wife. If opponents of a certain view actually put thought into why others held different views maybe there would be less mud slinging going around and the debate would be elevated. That's a truism for both sides of most arguments. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Aug 2015 3.35pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 23 Aug 15 3.55pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 23 Aug 2015 3.09pm
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 2.57pm
'Xenophobic' is ok? Good. That's just an observation of an illness of the mind and not a slur.
A dislike of outsiders is in fact a very natural human reaction. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Aug 2015 3.10pm)
Existentially, I believe hostility to others is flawed precisely because we fail to recognise that the individual self is an illusion, that consciousness is a collective experience and therefore we should show love and empathy towards others because these positive emotions will be reciprocated and perpetuated. Negativity breeds negativity and positivity breeds positivity, thus to bring it back to the topic of intercultural experiences, by showing a hostility towards them we are less likely to create the mutual benevolence that we all claim to desire.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 23 Aug 15 3.58pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 23 Aug 2015 2.27pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Aug 2015 9.01pm
Is someone directly calls you a racist, please hit the 'report thread to moderator', and I'll take a look, and discuss it with the other moderators. Similarly if anyone regards a post as directly racist, offensive or personal, report the thread and we'll take a look. Does that include Legaleagle continually implying and using various weasel word and phrases to indicate that people whose views he disagrees with are racists, without actually directly calling them that? Many thanks for yet another inaccurate personal slag of another poster.You don't help your own cause IMHO. Out of interest,what do you think racism is? Also,out of interest,would it be unreasonable to suggest that a person who would differentiate in the desirability of a person being their neighbour purely on the grounds of their race held racist views?If it would be,why? Edited by legaleagle (23 Aug 2015 4.02pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 3.58pm | |
---|---|
(duplicate)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 3.15pm
Y Quote Stirlingsays at 23 Aug 2015 3.09pm
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 2.57pm
'Xenophobic' is ok? Good. That's just an observation of an illness of the mind and not a slur.
A dislike of outsiders is in fact a very natural human reaction. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Aug 2015 3.10pm)
Edited by Kermit8 (23 Aug 2015 3.15pm) Does that involve rubber truncheons, re-eduction camps and communal singing of "I'd like to buy the world a coke"?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 23 Aug 2015 3.58pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 23 Aug 2015 2.27pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Aug 2015 9.01pm
Is someone directly calls you a racist, please hit the 'report thread to moderator', and I'll take a look, and discuss it with the other moderators. Similarly if anyone regards a post as directly racist, offensive or personal, report the thread and we'll take a look. Does that include Legaleagle continually implying and using various weasel word and phrases to indicate that people whose views he disagrees with are racists, without actually directly calling them that? Many thanks for yet another inaccurate personal slag of another poster.You don't help your own cause IMHO. Out of interest,what do you think racism is? Also,out of interest,would it be unreasonable to suggest that a person who would differentiate in the desirability of a person being their neighbour purely on the grounds of their race held racist views?If it would be,why? Edited by legaleagle (23 Aug 2015 4.02pm) The word 'racism' now has whatever meaning the politically correct lib/left establishment want to give it. Similarly, the word 'fascist' - both have lost any real meaning. Yes, it would be extremely unreasonable to call someone a racist merely because they choose to move home because they do not like the way a neighbourhood has changed.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 23 Aug 15 4.12pm | |
---|---|
You haven't actually answered either question. Do you want to try again? What,to you,is racism? Also,out of interest,would it be unreasonable to suggest that a person who would differentiate in the desirability of a person being their neighbour purely on the grounds of their race held racist views?If it would be,why? I won't push the point if you don't want to actually answer.But,given how often you post about your concerns about the iniquities of people being called racists who aren't,its of some interest to work out what you actually consider would be racism. Presumably,if something was racism,a person couldn't complain at being called a racist? Indeed you'd think they might say "its racist,but what's wrong with that? Such views are perfectly reasonable".
Edited by legaleagle (23 Aug 2015 4.14pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 4.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 23 Aug 2015 4.12pm
You haven't actually answered either question. Do you want to try again? What,to you,is racism? Also,out of interest,would it be unreasonable to suggest that a person who would differentiate in the desirability of a person being their neighbour purely on the grounds of their race held racist views?If it would be,why? I won't push the point if you don't want to actually answer.But,given how often you post about your concerns about the iniquities of people being called racists who aren't,its of some interest to work out what you actually consider would be racism. Presumably,if something was racism,a person couldn't complain at being called a racist? Or do you think even that would be unfair?
Firstly of course, it is highly amusing that you of all people criticise someone for not answering a question. Of course I did answer your questions. But if you want a definition of what the word means detached from the corruption of it by the politically correct, then: "the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races." Something that I would think very few people indeed believe, certainly not me. Perhaps now, you can answer a question: do you consider me a racist, yes or no? Edited by leggedstruggle (23 Aug 2015 4.19pm)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.