You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Harmless'
November 23 2024 10.51pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

'Harmless'

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 8 of 9 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

  

chris123 Flag hove actually 27 Jul 15 9.48am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jul 2015 9.34am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 8.23pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 24 Jul 2015 4.18pm


I want to live in a society where people have the right to choose for themselves how they recreationally alter their consciousness, because there is no really clear consensus.

Its the last of the morality laws. Now that its ok to be gay, black, dance on sundays, gamble, drink, screw and otherwise take pleasure in your self. There has always been, in this country, a strong moral group who expect others to abide by their traditions and demands, and reject the idea of anything different.

I'm kind of with you to a certain extent.....I'm just reacting to the ideological position of this is a 'right or wrong' matter. It really comes down to the society you want to live in.

Personally I still can't stand most junkies...Well the ones I met....And most definitely junkie culture....But that's ok....Everyone's different and have the right to be. No one forces me or mine to smoke or sniff anything......We even get stoner comedies now and everybody laughs.....Except stiffs like me.

I'd prefer the system to either just go hard core and ban all non medical usage of mind altering drugs or just allow it completely.

Consistency of message.....Not the current soft but tut tut acceptance.

Even in my days of heavy use, and habit, I couldn't abide junkies any more than I can pathetic alcoholics. I've known heroin users who aren't junkies as well, which you don't tend to hear about (never had a problem with it myself either).

The problem, I think, is that the tried and tested approach failed. It doesn't serve the pragmatic best interests of non-users, drug users or society in general, the only people who actually benefit from it, pragmatically speaking, are criminals, especially in the trafficking and distribution levels.

A conservative estimate is that the UK spends 12bn a year on cannabis. Only a tiny percentage of this enters the economy, through laundered front taxation or 'trickle down effect'.

The problem with a moral stance, is of course, morality is entirely subjective and based on a false premis (that it actually does any good, which it doesn't). The criminal justice solution just ends up criminalizing people who haven't really caused any harm, and pushing them out of a lot of gainful employment.


I don't know where you get 12 billion from, every man woman and child would have to spend a couple of hundred quid a year on cannabis for that to be right.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 15 9.50am

Quote fed up eagle at 24 Jul 2015 7.49pm

There is no war on drugs anymore. Police turn a blind eye because they know that they'll be forced to take on a mountain of paperwork, and it's readily available on every street corner and every side alley.

Well not quite that extreme, but its a war that can't be won, ultimately has no value to society, and massively hampers police resources. Most police officers seem to think its a futile gesture aimed at a false moral stance, perpetuated by a tabloid media's love of scaremongering, rather than reporting.

And its been far more damaging for society, here and internationally, than the Volstead act in the US was (given its been going on for 50 years).

If you can't win a war, when the other side is on drugs....


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 27 Jul 15 9.53am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 15 9.57am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.48am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jul 2015 9.34am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 8.23pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 24 Jul 2015 4.18pm


I want to live in a society where people have the right to choose for themselves how they recreationally alter their consciousness, because there is no really clear consensus.

Its the last of the morality laws. Now that its ok to be gay, black, dance on sundays, gamble, drink, screw and otherwise take pleasure in your self. There has always been, in this country, a strong moral group who expect others to abide by their traditions and demands, and reject the idea of anything different.

I'm kind of with you to a certain extent.....I'm just reacting to the ideological position of this is a 'right or wrong' matter. It really comes down to the society you want to live in.

Personally I still can't stand most junkies...Well the ones I met....And most definitely junkie culture....But that's ok....Everyone's different and have the right to be. No one forces me or mine to smoke or sniff anything......We even get stoner comedies now and everybody laughs.....Except stiffs like me.

I'd prefer the system to either just go hard core and ban all non medical usage of mind altering drugs or just allow it completely.

Consistency of message.....Not the current soft but tut tut acceptance.

Even in my days of heavy use, and habit, I couldn't abide junkies any more than I can pathetic alcoholics. I've known heroin users who aren't junkies as well, which you don't tend to hear about (never had a problem with it myself either).

The problem, I think, is that the tried and tested approach failed. It doesn't serve the pragmatic best interests of non-users, drug users or society in general, the only people who actually benefit from it, pragmatically speaking, are criminals, especially in the trafficking and distribution levels.

A conservative estimate is that the UK spends 12bn a year on cannabis. Only a tiny percentage of this enters the economy, through laundered front taxation or 'trickle down effect'.

The problem with a moral stance, is of course, morality is entirely subjective and based on a false premis (that it actually does any good, which it doesn't). The criminal justice solution just ends up criminalizing people who haven't really caused any harm, and pushing them out of a lot of gainful employment.


I don't know where you get 12 billion from, every man woman and child would have to spend a couple of hundred quid a year on cannabis for that to be right.

Sorry that's the illegal drug trade is worth about 12bn (10-20bn) a year. I initially edited it to put cannabis, which is worth 5bn a year in sales (2013), and forgot to change the 12 to a 5).

Interestingly the UK spends about 400 a year per citizen on maintaining UK drug policy.

A lot of people do spend more than a few hundred quid a year on cannabis (in fact most people who partake I'd imagine spend easily over a few grand a year).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 27 Jul 15 10.02am Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 27 Jul 15 10.14am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 27 Jul 15 10.17am Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.


If you are including coffee chops as part of the black market then yes, you are quite correct but you are also being more than a little pedantic.

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 27 Jul 15 10.22am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.17am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.


If you are including coffee chops as part of the black market then yes, you are quite correct but you are also being more than a little pedantic.


Pedantic or not, just following what was reported in Newsweek earlier this year.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 27 Jul 15 10.29am Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.22am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.17am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.


If you are including coffee chops as part of the black market then yes, you are quite correct but you are also being more than a little pedantic.


Pedantic or not, just following what was reported in Newsweek earlier this year.

[Link]


It backs up my point Chris. Black markets thrive only on illegality

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 27 Jul 15 10.35am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.29am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.22am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.17am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.


If you are including coffee chops as part of the black market then yes, you are quite correct but you are also being more than a little pedantic.


Pedantic or not, just following what was reported in Newsweek earlier this year.

[Link]


It backs up my point Chris. Black markets thrive only on illegality


You said there was zero black market in Holland, and that does not seem to be correct. There clearly is a growing black market.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 27 Jul 15 10.41am Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.35am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.29am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.22am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.17am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.


If you are including coffee chops as part of the black market then yes, you are quite correct but you are also being more than a little pedantic.


Pedantic or not, just following what was reported in Newsweek earlier this year.

[Link]


It backs up my point Chris. Black markets thrive only on illegality


You said there was zero black market in Holland, and that does not seem to be correct. There clearly is a growing black market.


Yes, ok, you are correct - but that wasn't the point I was making. Stirling claimed that changing the legality doesn't effect the black market. I disagreed and your article (that states that the black market is growing as certain types of weed are being made illegal) confirms this.

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 15 11.26am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 10.14am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 10.02am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.53am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.45am

Quote chris123 at 27 Jul 2015 9.39am

Quote Superfly at 27 Jul 2015 9.22am

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 7.59pm

Quote Superfly at 24 Jul 2015 3.55pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 24 Jul 2015 3.36pm

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.19am

Should be legal, as should ecstasy. Both are a lot less harmful/addictive than alcohol and smoking, as outlined by the drugs report commissioned by the government, who then sacked the guy who wrote it (forget his name) because it didn't fit in with their policy. Would also be much safer than picking up off a dealer that's mixed it with all sorts, meaning less deaths (that's what we all want right?) and would make the government a sh*t load in cash, as well as reducing street crime. What's not to like?

The government selling it does not mean people will stop buying from the black market. The market will always be cheaper and will always ignore restrictions. People will still be attracted to that and the usual suspects or the unlucky ones will still die.


Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jul 2015 3.44pm)


Pretty much the opposite is true. The legal market/government would be able to produce it at a fraction of the cost of the black market.

No it isn't, I researched this a while back on another thread....Some state in America. The black market still operates. Research it yourself.


The States is in its infancy. There's zero black market for weed in the Netherlands.


Still not legal in Holland though is it.


No, it's decriminalised. Not sure what point you're making though chief If it was legal in the Netherlands it wouldn't strenghthen the black market.


It's illegal to possess.


Legal or illegal or decriminalised or unenforced or otherwise - it's still had nothing to do with the point.


The comment that there is a zero black market in Holland is not accurate.

The cannabis black market in Holland is negligible. Most of the black market cannabis in Holland is on route elsewhere. I've never heard of anyone in Holland who buys weed or resin from a non-coffee shop source (except for the purpose of trafficking out of Holland).

The price is 6 euros a gram to 11 euros a gram where as an eighth, actually usually 1.5 grams oddly, in the UK goes for 15-25 quid upwards. I doubt that its worth actually buying cannabis in Holland from an unlicensed source.

Of course a coffee shop cannot sell more than 5g to a single customer.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 8 of 9 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Harmless'