This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Midlands Eagle 03 Mar 21 2.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I’ve done a bit of background reading on it now. In my opinion, FFP is still not helping the smaller teams compete. The big failure with FFP is that it only benefits the bigger clubs with wealthy owners. Whilst owners aren't allowed to pump in funds for general working capital purposes they can fund projects like stadium building which in turn results in higher attendances which in turn automatically means higher non TV income
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Mar 21 2.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
There have been a number of very good posts on this thread so I am glad I started, and this is my final thought. I am using collective names for the sake of ease not to deride. The " Non Roy Out Brigade tend to put more emphasis on facts, objective issues like points etc and are free in criticising style when they don't like it. The " Roy Out Brigade " are not fact driven and their complaints are predominantly subjective on matters of entertainment, style etc and are often like to forecast gloom and doom opinions as " facts ". i.e We will only get so many points in remaining games and this is what will happen if Roy stays .etc " Opinions are just that so using " may ", "might", "possibly" rather than " will " might be worth considering. Good talk Now, positive thoughts everyone for the Manure game Edited by HKOwen (03 Mar 2021 12.15pm) Points stop happening after the other things have eroded. We’re slowly eroding things and storing up problems to come. Soon we will either have one of the 3 worst teams or accept we are when we line up, even if we aren’t. This is what is unfolding. You cannot quantify it because of course it hasn’t happened yet. I remember that start of season away game at newly promoted Sheffield Utd last season where we treated them like Barcelona. Sheffield utd hadn’t had a chance to get into a stride in the league but we rocked up and let them get into 5th gear as we were struggling to crunch into 2nd. If I was asked if we should sack Roy, I’d ask for who instead and how they will be equipped. Not why we should sack (extend his contract) Roy. You can do that these days. Those days of the managers’ union and not talking to owners behind the current manager’s back are long gone. Goes with the huge money at risk of failure and multi million bumper pay offs that aren’t really being ‘sacked’ at all.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 03 Mar 21 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Yep, those were the same conclusion I came to, though I feel that the benefits are very much worth the disbenefits, given the utter shambles so many cowboys have left so many football clubs in. To extend your example of one person earning £1m p/a and the next £100k, with both being able to invest only 10% of it - the further cruel twist is that the guy earning £1m not only has a far larger business than the guy on £100k (with whom he is competing), but will also grow his business not only far larger, but also far faster. The actual sum equal to each persons 10% will grow each year as their respective businesses grow, but the rate at which the rich mans 10% grows will be far greater than the rate at which the poor mans grows, because his business is ten times larger to begin with. Hence the situation you describe, where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. You could demonstrate therefore that the longer we stay in this league, the relatively less well off we become compared to everyone else who has been in the league as long or longer. Our position in the financial pecking order gets worse every year, not better, unless someone with more money than us makes a mess of it and goes down, and gets replaced by a smaller club than us. The current FFP regs do play a big part in appraising what one's expectations of Palace actually are, and of seeing the clubs long term plans in context. It’s a little bit off the detail of what your discussing , but more and more it would seem , the actual Premiership is only ten clubs at most. It could in reality be as little as six.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 03 Mar 21 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
It’s a little bit off the detail of what your discussing , but more and more it would seem , the actual Premiership is only ten clubs at most. It could in reality be as little as six. Otherwise known as the European super league. Fans have opposed that idea for decades, but as you rightly say, it's basically a two tier league now anyway. The way the money is distributed makes it harder and harder to change the status quo. Even if you've got determined ownership and great infrastructure like Leicester had, you still need the greatest sports miracle of all time to change your status, and that will wear off when the likes of arsenal get their arse into gear. The only alternative is to adopt the American model, where the worst team from last year gets first choice of the transfers this year. That apparently prevents monopolies building up, but their system is so different to ours that you couldn't just do as they do directly.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 03 Mar 21 3.38pm | |
---|---|
Haha, so we have finally nailed it. 1) We are crap Never mind, I might see the Man Utd match in a slightly different light now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 03 Mar 21 3.41pm | |
---|---|
I kind of view it as 3 mini leagues - The top 6 or 7 clubs - the middle 6 or 7 clubs & the remainder - in terms of investment were probably in the bottom group with a challenge of clawing our way into the middle group whilst every year watching other clubs drop through the relegation trapdoor, but as has been discussed on here at some length I think we can all see that its a lot easier to talk about it than do it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
gaz1959 Bamford Lancashire 03 Mar 21 3.53pm | |
---|---|
I do not expect us to win every game. this is Palace after all, all I expect is that we try hard, show passion and at least try to attack the opposition, something that our tactics at the moment are a long way from doing. I'm not moaning just asking for a little bit of fight and spirit, pride in the shirt.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 03 Mar 21 3.57pm | |
---|---|
Being knocked out of both cups each season without even trying is not what I want. Eventually, I'd like it if we actually tried to win something. It's not likely to be the League, let's tell the truth: a League Cup win or even final would be excellent. We all became fans at various times: myself 1979-80 Team of the eighties.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 03 Mar 21 4.16pm | |
---|---|
In the present moment I expect them to compete. I expect the players to come off the field knowing they had given 100% to get a positive result. I expect the aim at the beginning of game is to win, none of this 0-0 is the best we could hope for bollocks.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 03 Mar 21 4.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Haha, so we have finally nailed it. 1) We are crap Never mind, I might see the Man Utd match in a slightly different light now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elwissthebest Marlborough 03 Mar 21 5.22pm | |
---|---|
We will never win the Premiership. It's just impossible because it's rigged so that only the richest sides can win. How exciting. Even Leicester's success a few seasons ago makes no difference. They are streets ahead of us anyway. But if I wanted to support a team that won all the time, I'd support Citeh. Coppell's team that finished third in the top flight was the best Palace team ever. How did we manage that? Can we ever get back to those heights?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 03 Mar 21 6.17pm | |
---|---|
It’s incredible that people haven’t grasped this yet; It’s possible to want to move on from Roy without expecting to compete with Man City and win the league... there are many, many, many levels of progress between that. We have had considerably better teams than this over the last 7 years and achieved very similar results, yet now supposedly this is the only way that could possibly keep us up? It’s just demonstrably untrue. All this talk of two-tier leagues, financial restraints compared with the super clubs... it’s just disingenuous. Compare our performances to the clubs around us.. we’ve lost to plenty of them in the last month it’s fairly easily done.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.