This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jan 20 6.53pm | |
---|---|
Hodgson has said that in midfield we are "Blessed in that department" and have "Strength of numbers" so what may one ask was the rationale for signing Camarasa who clearly never fitted into our system ? After signing Camarasa,Rakip,Jach,Sako,Sorloth etc is it any wonder that supporters are quizzical about our recruitment? Edited by Willo (13 Jan 2020 6.55pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nead1 13 Jan 20 7.22pm | |
---|---|
What you don't say is that two were loans so the club could take a look before spending any significant money - including Camerasa, one was a short term deal (Sako) based on a previously successful spell with Roy, one was clearly an incorrect punt (Jach) but no significant funding involved and the situation with Sorloth is well documented - given his time in Turkey he is perhaps much better than was widely acknowledged.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 13 Jan 20 7.44pm | |
---|---|
I find it galling that he never got an opportunity.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 13 Jan 20 9.20pm | |
---|---|
I presume Camarasa is now free to talk to the Spanish media about his experience here; should be interesting.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jan 20 9.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
I presume Camarasa is now free to talk to the Spanish media about his experience here; should be interesting. My understanding is that there was a loan fee of £1.35 mill.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fishbone London 13 Jan 20 9.30pm | |
---|---|
southnorwoodhill I couldn't agree more and very insulting to the player!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bexley Eagle Bexley Kent 13 Jan 20 10.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
After signing Camarasa,Rakip,Jach,Sako,Sorloth etc is it any wonder that supporters are quizzical about our recruitment? Edited by Willo (13 Jan 2020 6.55pm) You are cherry picking as there are a number of decent signing that offset those mentioned. And to be fair of that list only Sorloth cost a significant sum and given he is doing well on loan we may still recover our costs there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jan 20 10.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bexley Eagle
You are cherry picking as there are a number of decent signing that offset those mentioned. And to be fair of that list only Sorloth cost a significant sum and given he is doing well on loan we may still recover our costs there. In another post I did mention that in the summer we signed Cahill and Ayew on a permanent deal so not all negative on the recruitment front.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 13 Jan 20 11.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fishbone
southnorwoodhill I couldn't agree more and very insulting to the player!! Perhaps there's more to it. Deductions without data - very unwise.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 13 Jan 20 11.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Perhaps there's more to it. Deductions without data - very unwise. The reason is attitude. Came in with a billy big bollocks attitude, arrogant, sometimes late for training, sometimes not even turning up. Clearly didn’t fit the culture and with a poor work ethic. No amount of creativity outweighs retaining a strong team culture. All that said, surely should have been researched better to avoid wasting everyone’s time. Or Roy took a gamble and felt he could get him working. Who knows. What is also clear is that he would be playing if he was good enough, for enough and committed enough. At least two of those he was not. Not that hard to understand, really. Edited by SW19 CPFC (13 Jan 2020 11.55pm)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 14 Jan 20 12.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
The reason is attitude. Came in with a billy big bollocks attitude, arrogant, sometimes late for training, sometimes not even turning up. Clearly didn’t fit the culture and with a poor work ethic. No amount of creativity outweighs retaining a strong team culture. All that said, surely should have been researched better to avoid wasting everyone’s time. Or Roy took a gamble and felt he could get him working. Who knows. What is also clear is that he would be playing if he was good enough, for enough and committed enough. At least two of those he was not. Not that hard to understand, really. Edited by SW19 CPFC (13 Jan 2020 11.55pm) If this was /is the case, why did he even get taken on loan? Wasn't due diligence done? Totally inept.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 14 Jan 20 8.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I find it galling that he never got an opportunity. I totally agree with this. Reidewald has shown that we have talented players in the squad he just refused to use. The manager has surely got to have some say on players we sign?! Some might blame this on Camarasa's bad attitude, this is all just hear say, but if you know you aren't going to get a look in, then why should you bother. Roy's been around long enough to know how to keep a job. If he doesn't get involved in transfers, then it's one less thing to be accountable for.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.