This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
BBC bias against Trump
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  Hrolf The Ganger  01 Aug 16 5.25pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by buzby1
To compare Trump with Hitler is not lunacy. Both share absurd haircuts, both express racist views, both spoke publicly through angry tirades, both are sexist and misogynistic, both appealed the lowest common denominator and both are rabid power mongers. The BBC isn't biased against Trump, it's only reporting what's out there. We all need to hope and pray the madman doesn't win. But it was lunacy to reference Nazi Germany in relation to the EU. Hypocrisy alert!
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| steeleye20 Croydon 01 Aug 16 6.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Well the BBC does have one major fault - it does cling on to program formats year after year with personalities who have nothing to say. So viewers you can look forward to Gary Lineker and Alan Shearer back again in MOTD same old thing was it offside or a penalty or a bookable offence (wow) they are doing quite well arent'they? (won) do you think they will be safe? (lost). The MOTD audience has dropped like a stone in recent years still they are only ratings aren't they like a crisp? (s**t that's an ad) 'Highlights' means you actually see 10 seconds of football if you are still awake.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 01 Aug 16 6.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Even Homer is at it:
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 01 Aug 16 7.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Senator McCain (republican) is laying into Trump now but surely its too late to ditch him?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 01 Aug 16 7.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Some of the responses on this thread are just f'ing scary. At least he believes in isolationism so some Near East States may have a limited shelf life. If even if he is not a childish self absorbed women abuser; that's ignorance for you.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
leifandersonshair  Newport 01 Aug 16 7.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Show me where Corbyn has been treated to anything like the language that Trump has. To compare the bias against Corbyn to Trump isn't even on the same page. So I don't like the idea that if I say that the language and bias used against Trump is over the top that this makes me a representative of the 'hard right.' I'm talking overt bias against Trump......An attitude that could affect national relations if he becomes president. Irritating irresponsible behaviour is expected from elements of the left but when it's being state funded it becomes a different matter. And of course And really, you think Donald Trump will give 2 hoots about what a foreign news broadcaster is saying? Of course not. Also, apologies if it sounded like I was accusing you of being hard right- not my intention. I merely meant the hard right and hard left (in general) both think the BBC are biased against them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
EaglesEaglesEagles  01 Aug 16 8.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This thread should be about the failure of the BBC to criticise Hillary Clinton in any noticeable form (in my opinion endorsing her), despite the fact that she is a lying, backtracking, Wall Street smooching politician. She has a really poor record as Secretary of State too and as her main rival Bernie Sanders pointed out, has been accepting massive support from big businesses since the primaries who know her. I agree with her on gun crime. Assault weapons should not be allowed to be carried around in public like toys. Do I think she'd change her stance if she thought it would boost her ratings. Absolutely. The BBC does not pick up on her past failures and backtracking. Why do you think a lot of democrats hate her? Oh and for the record. Yes, Trump's an absolute moron. Edited by EaglesEaglesEagles (01 Aug 2016 8.41pm)
I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Aug 16 8.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by buzby1
To compare Trump with Hitler is not lunacy. Both share absurd haircuts, both express racist views, both spoke publicly through angry tirades, both are sexist and misogynistic, both appealed the lowest common denominator and both are rabid power mongers. The BBC isn't biased against Trump, it's only reporting what's out there. We all need to hope and pray the madman doesn't win. You say that like it's a bad thing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Aug 16 8.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by leifandersonshair
And of course And really, you think Donald Trump will give 2 hoots about what a foreign news broadcaster is saying? Of course not. Also, apologies if it sounded like I was accusing you of being hard right- not my intention. I merely meant the hard right and hard left (in general) both think the BBC are biased against them. . Edited by Cucking Funt (01 Aug 2016 8.46pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Aug 16 8.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EaglesEaglesEagles
This thread should be about the failure of the BBC to criticise Hillary Clinton in any noticeable form (in my opinion endorsing her), despite the fact that she is a lying, backtracking, Wall Street smooching politician. She has a really poor record as Secretary of State too and as her main rival Bernie Sanders pointed out, has been accepting massive support from big businesses since the primaries who know her. I agree with her on gun crime. Assault weapons should not be allowed to be carried around in public like toys. Do I think she'd change her stance if she thought it would boost her ratings. Absolutely. The BBC does not pick up on her past failures and backtracking. Why do you think a lot of democrats hate her? Oh and for the record. Yes, Trump's an absolute moron. Edited by EaglesEaglesEagles (01 Aug 2016 8.41pm) Why is someone who happens to have very firm views automatically a moron? Big mistake to think that.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| legaleagle 01 Aug 16 8.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EaglesEaglesEagles
This thread should be about the failure of the BBC to criticise Hillary Clinton in any noticeable form (in my opinion endorsing her), despite the fact that she is a lying, backtracking, Wall Street smooching politician. She has a really poor record as Secretary of State too and as her main rival Bernie Sanders pointed out, has been accepting massive support from big businesses since the primaries who know her. I agree with her on gun crime. Assault weapons should not be allowed to be carried around in public like toys. Do I think she'd change her stance if she thought it would boost her ratings. Absolutely. The BBC does not pick up on her past failures and backtracking. Why do you think a lot of democrats hate her? Oh and for the record. Yes, Trump's an absolute moron. Edited by EaglesEaglesEagles (01 Aug 2016 8.41pm) Out of interest,did you watch (I appreciate you are in Germany) Newsnight's nightly coverage of the Democratic Convention last week,and/or their feature "Does The US Public Trust Hillary Clinton?"
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 01 Aug 16 8.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
One of them will get the nuclear codes. Ah, well. we've had a good run us humans.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.