This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 27 Apr 16 8.21pm | |
---|---|
Either way the dear young doctors will have to just get on with it or leave and find employment elsewhere because the new pay schedules and working hours are going through right now. I just hope that they do not get paid a penny while on strike.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leifandersonshair Newport 27 Apr 16 8.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by susmik
Either way the dear young doctors will have to just get on with it or leave and find employment elsewhere because the new pay schedules and working hours are going through right now. I just hope that they do not get paid a penny while on strike. Oh dear, been reading the Daily Mail? Greedy doctors? It isn't about money. It's about being forced to push an already stretched 5 day service over 7 days, which WILL end up costing patients lives. Still, it's all going to the governments plan- force junior doctors out of the NHS with stupid, harmful policies, then in a couple of years, shrug and say, 'oh well, the NHS isn't sustainable now, there aren't enough staff. You'll all have to go private.' Then- ka ching! Doubles all round as the NHS is sold off piecemeal, and there are no more patients, only 'customers'. The ones who can afford to pay, that is- the rest will no doubt become 'non viable consumers' or some such. Maybe you should try speaking to a few junior doctors, before posting silly nonsense like this.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Apr 16 8.51pm | |
---|---|
I start d off supporting the doctors. Their starting salary is frankly ridiculous. However over the last month or so it has felt that the arguments have moved on. I am not going to pretend that I know all the ins and outs of the dispute but It does seem to have become more political. The guy who wrote this article was on BBC breakfast the other day and I think he makes some very good points. [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Apr 16 8.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by leifandersonshair
Oh dear, been reading the Daily Mail? Greedy doctors? It isn't about money. It's about being forced to push an already stretched 5 day service over 7 days, which WILL end up costing patients lives. Still, it's all going to the governments plan- force junior doctors out of the NHS with stupid, harmful policies, then in a couple of years, shrug and say, 'oh well, the NHS isn't sustainable now, there aren't enough staff. You'll all have to go private.' Then- ka ching! Doubles all round as the NHS is sold off piecemeal, and there are no more patients, only 'customers'. The ones who can afford to pay, that is- the rest will no doubt become 'non viable consumers' or some such. Maybe you should try speaking to a few junior doctors, before posting silly nonsense like this. How?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Apr 16 9.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
How? Isn't it that stretching the same amount of staff over 2 more compulsory days but with a maximum of 91 instead of 72 hours? Therefore at some point during the the 5 day week there will be less staff because some of them have been timetabled on sat or sun with no additional recruitment? Well that's how I understand it. Also, if they're not required or allowed to work more than 72, then they won't be more tired than they already are. However, what goes down on paper isn't always what really happens. If your colleagues are seriously stretched and leaving them and patients needing attention makes you feel guilty, do some stay? I bet they do.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Apr 16 9.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Isn't it that stretching the same amount of staff over 2 more compulsory days but with a maximum of 91 instead of 72 hours? Therefore at some point during the the 5 day week there will be less staff because some of them have been timetabled on sat or sun with no additional recruitment? Well that's how I understand it. Also, if they're not required or allowed to work more than 72, then they won't be more tired than they already are. However, what goes down on paper isn't always what really happens. If your colleagues are seriously stretched and leaving them and patients needing attention makes you feel guilty, do some stay? I bet they do. That's the logic everyone uses but seems flawed to me. What currently happens at weekends with no coverage? Is it better to have reduced rather than no cover? I thought that the hours were being reduced from 91 to 72? Also dedicated guardians to support them? As I say I don't profess to be an expert but they are some of the points the junior doctor I linked to raised
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Apr 16 9.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
That's the logic everyone uses but seems flawed to me. What currently happens at weekends with no coverage? Is it better to have reduced rather than no cover? I thought that the hours were being reduced from 91 to 72? Also dedicated guardians to support them? As I say I don't profess to be an expert but they are some of the points the junior doctor I linked to raised Yep, when you take time to look at it closer it doesn't make sense. And with the max hours being reduced from 91 to 72, if they worked 5 or 6 days in a week, they'd need to work 4 or 3 and 1/2 hours on top of already going over what they already were doing that day. Maybe I don't understand the hours.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
General 28 Apr 16 8.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ZIGnZAG
Feel sorry for me, don't make me laugh. Thankfully I haven't missed out on any medical attention these past two days. You should feel sorry for those that have. These people are prioritising a financial deal over the health care of others, its that simple, and it's that sickening. what other method ever gets results in this country please? haha you cracked me up with that comment. are you a spin doctor for employment? its all about the big picture of ruining something then privatisating the best parts and taxpayer still pays for the most costly parts. if you want that then you sir are the problem. not a doctor striking over being mugged off in their profession that they only do for the benefit of others. i had serious eye surgery on a sunday years back. no one in that day. i couldnt afford to wait til monday. senior consultants and doctors rushed in just for me that day and im forever grateful, i wouldnt have wanted them doing that tired or after a long ass week barely going home to relax and recover. over and out captain sensible
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
General 28 Apr 16 8.32am | |
---|---|
Saturday 7am-7pm Plain time what other industry pays this for unsociable hours!!?? anyone work in one? construction was time and half sat and double on sundays for gods sake and thats not exactly looking after someone who could die doctors get time and a third id f***ing strike too time and a third!! haha this country is already on the long dead road to oblivion unless your part of the elite and its only getting more rocky for us. oh well least palace are in the cup final
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 28 Apr 16 9.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by susmik
Either way the dear young doctors will have to just get on with it or leave and find employment elsewhere because the new pay schedules and working hours are going through right now. I just hope that they do not get paid a penny while on strike. May I suggest you read the following and in future try to gather some information other that what you read in the Daily Mail. This is direct from the horses mouth, from a junior doctor who has taken the time to explain in laymens terms why they are striking. Read. Digest. Then please stop spouting drivel.
If you simply believe what is said in the media, you might think that this is all about Saturday pay or even that junior doctors don't want to work at nights or weekends. It is depressing to overhear people express these views but hardly surprising given the public coverage of the issue. So what exactly is going on? A junior doctor is any doctor who is not a GP or consultant who is in training to be one of those two. Most doctors spend 8-9 years as a junior but many stay as juniors for longer, especially female doctors who may take time out for families, academics who take time out to do research and doctors in specialities where training in two specialties is needed such as paediatric intensive care. I myself spent 14 years as a junior doctor so was still one aged 37. Junior doctors are the doctors you will see first when you go to A&E or get admitted to a ward and will be responsible for delivering your day to day care when you are in hospital. Junior doctors are covering the hospital 24/7, 365 days a year and always have done. And contrary to what you might believe from the papers, they don't have any choice in the matter, their contracts say they have no choice in working evenings, nights and weekends. So what is all the fuss about? Well it is about being able to be safe. When I was a JD, I used to work ridiculous hours. In one job in my 1st year, every 3rd weekend I would go to work at 9am on a Saturday and leave at 5pm on a Tuesday. That was 80 hours in a row with sleep grabbed when the chances arose. It was dangerous and dehumanising and the even crazier thing was that I was actually paid at a lower rate for the unsocial hours than basic pay (1/3 of basic in fact). Fortunately my generation of juniors was amongst the last to have to do that and things slowly changed. Now junior doctors get paid at a higher rate than basic for unsocial hours, that rate determined by the intensity of work in that specialty e.g. emergency room work would be a higher rate than dermatology. Standard hours are defined as 7am-7pm Monday to Friday (which are not exactly standard working hours for most people) and there are rules on the maximum number of hours per week and consecutive hours that can be worked. There are also safeguards in place so that if employers are consistently making juniors work beyond these rules, they can be fined; hence there is a disincentive for employers to overwork junior doctors, therefore they are not tired and dangerous 1990-style. But work done outside standard hours is NOT overtime. These hours are contracted hours and have to be worked and, quite rightly, are paid at a higher rate than basic pay. In specialties where there is not a lot of emergency work, the majority of work is in routine hours, but areas like A&E, paediatrics, intensive care have a lot of work done in unsocial hours and attract a higher rate of pay for those hours. I stress again that this is not overtime; overtime is work done in addition to contracted hours. All doctors and nurses do overtime - staying late to complete work and ensure patient safety and very rarely if ever does anyone claim for these overtime hours. But Jeremy Hunt wants to change the contract for junior doctors, his logic being that doing this will help to deliver the “7-day NHS”. Nobody is really sure what exactly this means. It may mean that he wants routine services such as outpatient clinics and planned surgery or scans for non-urgent problems to take place on Saturdays and Sundays, not just Monday to Friday. If this is the case then changing the juniors’ contract is not going to make this happen as without doing the same for (deep breath) consultants, nurses, porters, receptionists, pharmacists, operating department assistants, radiographers, physiotherapists and many other staff these things won’t be able to happen at weekends. The 7-day NHS may refer to emergency work. If this is the case then it already exists. Junior doctors are already there at night and at weekends. The proposed contract changes are not going to change the numbers who are there as there is no plan to increase the total number of junior doctors. What is proposed is that the definition of normal time changes from 7am-7pm to 7am-10pm Monday to Friday and from 7am to somewhere between 5pm and 10pm on Saturday. This means that employers could make junior doctors work more unsocial hours as they have redefined as standard hours. It is true that the basic rate of pay for standard hours will be increased by 13%, which sounds great doesn’t it? Except that for the emergency specialties as above that routinely have a lot of evening, night and weekend work, what is currently paid at an enhanced rate will be paid at standard rate; even at 13% higher for standard rate, total pay for junior doctors in these specialties will drop considerably, maybe by as much 30% for some. Doesn’t sound so good now really. And, of course, there will be the same number of doctors but spread over 7 days rather than 5 so there will be weekdays where there will be fewer juniors than there are now. A great analogy I heard was to imagine that you have a 10-inch pizza cut into 5 slices. You decide that 5 slices isn’t going to fill you up so your mum cuts the same pizza into 7 slices and tells you that you’ll be full with that. But she won’t get you a bigger pizza. So same number of junior doctors spread more thinly is going to reduce cover on weekdays as compared to now. And weekdays are when not only emergency work but also routine planned work that also needs input from junior doctors takes place so this will have a detrimental effect on waiting lists for clinics and operations as well. Junior doctors with children will be hit particularly hard, especially those who have junior doctors spouses, as more unsocial hours will be worked. Childcare is generally difficult to get hold of outside of 8-5 on weekdays; the department of health have actually said (with no hint of irony) that in this situation, family members who are non-medical and don’t work evenings or weekends should be asked to provide child care to get over this problem! It is very likely that couples could go several days without actually seeing each other or their families if rotas do not coincide. But what about the increased deaths at weekends we have been hearing about? Actually, the statistics have been completely misrepresented and even the authors of the research paper that gets quoted regularly have pointed this out. The statistic was that if you are admitted to hospital on a weekend, your risk of dying within 30 days of that admission was higher than if admitted midweek. Your risk of dying is very low anyway and that very low risk is marginally higher (but still very low) if admitted on weekends. This is probably because admissions to hospital in the week consist of not only sick people but also well people coming in for routine things, whereas at weekends you would tend to avoid hospital unless you were desperately unwell and most likely would leave things as long as possible and so be sicker when you got there. Interestingly they also showed that if you were already in hospital on a weekend, having been admitted in the week, your risk of death within 30 days was lower than it would have been. Either way, there is no evidence of cause and effect in terms of numbers of junior doctors around at weekends. The so-called weekend effect has also been seen in the USA and Australia too so it isn’t peculiar to state-funded health as opposed to private insurance-based systems. Interestingly the misrepresentation of this study has led to ill people actually avoiding hospitals on weekends and delaying presenting till Monday with potentially devastating consequences. Have a look online for the #hunteffect. Scary. Another worrying thing about the proposed new contract is that it takes away the safeguards against juniors being made to work ridiculously long hours. Whereas currently there is a mechanism that makes it in the interests of an employer to ensure the hours are not exceeded, the new contract removes these safeguards. It does suggest that each hospital trust has a “guardian” to whom junior doctors can flag up concerns about their hours but this “guardian” will also be a senior member of the trust who has no obligation to actually do anything about these concerns. I think back to my days as an exhausted junior doctor and it scares me to think that such unsafe and dangerous hours could make a return. The pay scales are also changing. There has been automatic pay progression as you gain experience and seniority until now. The new system means that there are fewer points where pay is raised. This is not necessarily a bad thing as it can be argued that you shouldn’t get a pay rise unless you deserve it. But remember that over 10 years can be spent as a junior doctor in which time you are likely to acquire husbands, wives, children and mortgages; many existing junior doctors have made their financial plans for the next few years based on the expectation that there will be pay progression. One part-time junior doctor who has worked with me told me that if the new contract came in she would no longer be able to pay her mortgage and would have to sell her home. Bear in mind that these are young people who have spent at least 5 years at university accruing debts from both student loans for living expenses and now also £45000 in tuition fees before even starting work. The new pay scales do not reflect the levels of responsibility taken by junior doctors at different stages of their training at all which makes no sense whatsoever. For female doctors who are likely to take time out to have children and then return to work part-time, the consequences on their income will be huge. The department of health actually acknowledged that women would be hit unfairly but suggested that this had to be accepted as an unfortunate consequence. The BMA junior doctors committee walked out of talks with the department of health because the DH’s definition of negotiation was that they would reserve the right to do what they wanted if they didn’t agree with what the committee was suggested. In other words, they did not want to negotiate so there was not point in the BMA trying. This is why industrial action was proposed because there was no other way to try to get Jeremy Hunt to talk. Sadly, even when negotiations restarted, he could not see that without a bigger pizza nothing was going to improve patient care and in fact things would be worse and so talks stopped. He has now said he is imposing the contract and that is that, he won’t talk anymore. When a strike ballot (of, let’s face it, intelligent reasonable and educated people) has a 75% turnout and 98% vote in favour, it is clear that there is a serious problem with the DH’s thought processes and they need to listen. It is highly improbable that a small bunch of radical lefties have brainwashed 50000 intelligent doctors who have been trained to analyse information and draw conclusions, much as the press like that idea. If you have read this far, please take it on board and share with your friends. I’ve tried to keep it simple (even though it may not seem that way!) The public is not getting the full story from the TV and newspapers and if this contract is imposed then we will all be on the receiving end of the consequences eventually. I’ll stop there for now but will write some more about what will happen on the days of the full strike (April 26th and 27th) and why you should not have to worry about what may happen on those days if you or your family have to come to hospital.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 28 Apr 16 9.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by susmik
Either way the dear young doctors will have to just get on with it or leave and find employment elsewhere because the new pay schedules and working hours are going through right now. I just hope that they do not get paid a penny while on strike. What do you do for a living out of interest?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 28 Apr 16 9.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
What do you do for a living out of interest? Susmik's long retired. Old school Tory. I like him. A curio from the past.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.