You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > No more immigrants.
November 23 2024 7.24am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

No more immigrants.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 67 of 85 < 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 >

  

matt_himself Flag Matataland 09 Sep 15 12.48pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 9.58am

Quote matt_himself at 09 Sep 2015 8.07am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Sep 2015 3.43pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.30pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Sep 2015 1.00pm

We have always had immigrants......At a reasonable level I think there is an element of truth in all that guff the politicians want us to believe about immigration being positive......They all say it like a mantra.

When I say a reasonable level I mean immigration used as a tool to balance the economy........Though I hasten to add not as tool to drive down wages for several already low paid workforces.

Our immigration level should definitely take account of our housing situation.

As a country I truly feel we are sticking our collective heads in the sand over housing provision......We are widening the divide between people.

Many who work just have no realistic chance of owning their home........The baby boomers had the cream of the chances and have screwed it all up for the next generations.

But to go back to my original point, immigration can be positive if it is controlled and takes account of the host population instead of treating them like dumping grounds and culturally rapidly changing the nature of their living spaces......That's what 'freedom of movement' has given us.

People talk about London as being a success story......But they ignore that many many people left London because of rapid change.....Many people whose families had lived there for many generations.

reasonableness and the immigration debate aren't on the same page.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Sep 2015 1.01pm)


London in now rated by respected institutions as the top triple A* city on the globe and the most dynamic followed in second by New York.

Something has gone right there since we were kids. It's a lot more varied colourful and interesting and, unfortunately, expensive but it is truly an amazing metropolis. The people make it fascinating imo.

Respected by whom? Might be ok for wealthy people and visitors, pretty awful for ordinary people. I hear they are are fleeing to the likes of Devon.

My London friends are "ordinary people". They love the place. But I will tell them they are wrong and it is pretty awful for them.

Depends where you go in London. Some of its a s**thole, other parts are ok and some parts are really nice.

Certainly immigration is neither negative or positive, its both, there are pro's and cons, and even some of those pros and cons vary according to how immigration affects you.

The truth is that if you live in a South London say Bermondsey estate or council block, then its probably a negative experience immigration and refugees, but then you're already in one of the most negative aspects of London life anyhow. Its just now you can blame the immigrants, rather than the Housing Crisis, prices in London etc.

But in truth, even without the refugees, you're still in a s**ty place, that's always been s**ty. Places like Thorton Heath, Peckham haven't really been made worse by Immigration and Ayslum, they were always s**t.


The last paragraph is either based on ignorance or hopeless devotion to multiculturalism.

Unfortunately immigration has made places like Thornton Heath worse. There are separate communities living in the same area who view each other as from the moon. The area is far less looked after than 25 years ago, largely due to the number of transient inhabitants. There is more crime and no go areas. Places that brough the community together, like pubs, are now shut down.

Unfortunately you don't get to see this unless you live in the area.

My family come from the area, Thorton Heath has always been a s**t hole, Croydon has always been crap as has Peckham. They've also always had high crime rates. They're worse now definitely, but its not just immigration, the death of Industry in the UK really created problems of low wages and unemployment in South London.

The crime is different to some extent, but South London has always had a problem with Gangs, right back since the 60s. The Flying Squad identified South London as being a principle location of threat for Armed Robbery.

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
oldcodger Flag 09 Sep 15 12.48pm Send a Private Message to oldcodger Add oldcodger as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 12.32pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 12.09pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 11.51am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 11.21am

Quote Willo at 09 Sep 2015 10.19am

The 20,000 Syrians who will come to the UK over the next 5 years will not begin to satisfy the likes of Yvette Cooper and some left-wingers who seemingly want open access for the world's suffering people.

Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?

Yes, relative to where they used to be.


Edited by leggedstruggle (09 Sep 2015 11.51am)

Examples???

Gay Marriage; cuts to the armed forces; the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; protecting the overseas aid budget; record £8 billion a year to the NHS for the next five years. Corbyn would be proud of all these policies.

I vote Conservative but..

Gay Marriage is a dead issue. It's moving beyond being 'left or right'. Conservatives will come to be about as concerned with it as interracial marriage.

Again, overseas budget, not really a firm left or right issue.

Aging population, so too right the NHS budget is protected or increased. Besides, for better of worse the elderly are of more value as a voting demographic so it's inevitable.

Fair point on the armed forces. We're a shadow of what we used to be. It's a shame but as we see from the Syria drone situation we're fighting smarter. Technology trumps boots on the ground now.

Conservatives have not become left wing. There's always UKIP for people on nostalgia overload.

Edited by oldcodger (09 Sep 2015 12.50pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 09 Sep 15 12.51pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 12.32pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 12.09pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 11.51am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 11.21am

Quote Willo at 09 Sep 2015 10.19am

The 20,000 Syrians who will come to the UK over the next 5 years will not begin to satisfy the likes of Yvette Cooper and some left-wingers who seemingly want open access for the world's suffering people.

Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?

Yes, relative to where they used to be.


Edited by leggedstruggle (09 Sep 2015 11.51am)

Examples???

Gay Marriage; cuts to the armed forces; the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; protecting the overseas aid budget; record £8 billion a year to the NHS for the next five years. Corbyn would be proud of all these policies.

Sorry but how are Gay Marriage, Cuts to the Armed forces in a period of government austerity, economic migration that benefits business left wing (which it probably couldn't have done anything about).

If I remember rightly it was the conservatives who first decriminalized Homosexuality.

You mean its 'not Tebbit right'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 09 Sep 15 12.53pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend


Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?


I mentioned Yvette Cooper. Whereas Britain will accept 20,000 refugess by 2020 the other day she called for 50,000.

As for the 'Left Wing', I really don't have to add to what has already been mentioned in this debate.



--------------------------------------------------

Hmm, so 50,000 over 5 years is 'open access'. Oh boy, you certainly can't count Willo.

To be clear, around 600,000 people enter the UK every year and net migration is 318,000. Of those entering the UK, around 200,000 come to study and largely should leave again.

Of the 400,000 left, 24,000 came seeking asylum. A similar number to the volume of expatriated Brits that return home each year.

So by my reckoning Comrade Ms Cooper is asking that we increase our asylum seeker numbers by 42% and our long-term immigration numbers by 2.5% per annum.

On the other hand Germany has around a million immigrants a year but it's net migration (due to leavers) is around 400,000. It intends to take a further 500,000 per year. This makes sense for it as it has a falling population and strong economy. Note that a part of its approach is to get the early migrants who tend to be richer and better educated. Clever old Germany.

Edited by Mapletree (09 Sep 2015 12.53pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 09 Sep 15 1.01pm

Quote matt_himself at 09 Sep 2015 12.48pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 9.58am

Quote matt_himself at 09 Sep 2015 8.07am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Sep 2015 3.43pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.30pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Sep 2015 1.00pm

We have always had immigrants......At a reasonable level I think there is an element of truth in all that guff the politicians want us to believe about immigration being positive......They all say it like a mantra.

When I say a reasonable level I mean immigration used as a tool to balance the economy........Though I hasten to add not as tool to drive down wages for several already low paid workforces.

Our immigration level should definitely take account of our housing situation.

As a country I truly feel we are sticking our collective heads in the sand over housing provision......We are widening the divide between people.

Many who work just have no realistic chance of owning their home........The baby boomers had the cream of the chances and have screwed it all up for the next generations.

But to go back to my original point, immigration can be positive if it is controlled and takes account of the host population instead of treating them like dumping grounds and culturally rapidly changing the nature of their living spaces......That's what 'freedom of movement' has given us.

People talk about London as being a success story......But they ignore that many many people left London because of rapid change.....Many people whose families had lived there for many generations.

reasonableness and the immigration debate aren't on the same page.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Sep 2015 1.01pm)


London in now rated by respected institutions as the top triple A* city on the globe and the most dynamic followed in second by New York.

Something has gone right there since we were kids. It's a lot more varied colourful and interesting and, unfortunately, expensive but it is truly an amazing metropolis. The people make it fascinating imo.

Respected by whom? Might be ok for wealthy people and visitors, pretty awful for ordinary people. I hear they are are fleeing to the likes of Devon.

My London friends are "ordinary people". They love the place. But I will tell them they are wrong and it is pretty awful for them.

Depends where you go in London. Some of its a s**thole, other parts are ok and some parts are really nice.

Certainly immigration is neither negative or positive, its both, there are pro's and cons, and even some of those pros and cons vary according to how immigration affects you.

The truth is that if you live in a South London say Bermondsey estate or council block, then its probably a negative experience immigration and refugees, but then you're already in one of the most negative aspects of London life anyhow. Its just now you can blame the immigrants, rather than the Housing Crisis, prices in London etc.

But in truth, even without the refugees, you're still in a s**ty place, that's always been s**ty. Places like Thorton Heath, Peckham haven't really been made worse by Immigration and Ayslum, they were always s**t.


The last paragraph is either based on ignorance or hopeless devotion to multiculturalism.

Unfortunately immigration has made places like Thornton Heath worse. There are separate communities living in the same area who view each other as from the moon. The area is far less looked after than 25 years ago, largely due to the number of transient inhabitants. There is more crime and no go areas. Places that brough the community together, like pubs, are now shut down.

Unfortunately you don't get to see this unless you live in the area.

My family come from the area, Thorton Heath has always been a s**t hole, Croydon has always been crap as has Peckham. They've also always had high crime rates. They're worse now definitely, but its not just immigration, the death of Industry in the UK really created problems of low wages and unemployment in South London.

The crime is different to some extent, but South London has always had a problem with Gangs, right back since the 60s. The Flying Squad identified South London as being a principle location of threat for Armed Robbery.

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.

I'm relying on what my family who lived in the area, and still live in the area have told me about it. Basically its worse, but it was always bad. I spend quite a bit of time in and around the area, and my wife lived up in Eltham and Catford for about six years before moving to Reading.

I don't have to live there to know its s**t, my family moved away from Peckham and Bermondsey in the 50s and 60s because it was a crime ridden s**t hole and they could afford to move to a council estate in Dulwich.

I never said it wasn't s**tier or worse, but that those areas have always been s**t anyhow. Pouring more and more immigrants into the area hasn't helped.

Thank god the 80s wasn't full of gangs of youths and men turning up places kicking the s**t out of each other and occasionally killing one another. I must have imagined that football hooliganism that was going on.

Basically, these areas are s**tholes that have only gotten s**tier over time, and generally people who can afford to move away.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 09 Sep 15 1.01pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Which part of Croydon do you live in Matt? I have said before on this forum that anywhere South of the centre of Croydon is not a sh&thole and the crime rates are extremely low. I do wish people would stop dissing Croydon.

By the way, nothing wrong with much of Thornton Heath when I was a kid but Selhurst had a reputation. No doubt parts of our manor have become nastier in my life time. I ABSOLUTELY would not expect Syrians to make it worse, they are a good bunch. But we did get stuffed with the dodgiest b*stards from many countries, like Yardies, Turkish gangsters, Tamil gangs and Triads. Maybe we could change the discussion to the management of criminals, not 'keeping out Johnny Foreigner'.

Edited by Mapletree (09 Sep 2015 1.02pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 09 Sep 15 2.00pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 12.32pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 12.09pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 11.51am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 11.21am

Quote Willo at 09 Sep 2015 10.19am

The 20,000 Syrians who will come to the UK over the next 5 years will not begin to satisfy the likes of Yvette Cooper and some left-wingers who seemingly want open access for the world's suffering people.

Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?

Yes, relative to where they used to be.


Edited by leggedstruggle (09 Sep 2015 11.51am)

Examples???

Gay Marriage; cuts to the armed forces; the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; protecting the overseas aid budget; record £8 billion a year to the NHS for the next five years. Corbyn would be proud of all these policies.


Jamie beat me to it, it depends on your position. In your case it is about coloureds and queers.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 09 Sep 15 2.09pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 12.51pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 12.32pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 12.09pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 11.51am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 11.21am

Quote Willo at 09 Sep 2015 10.19am

The 20,000 Syrians who will come to the UK over the next 5 years will not begin to satisfy the likes of Yvette Cooper and some left-wingers who seemingly want open access for the world's suffering people.

Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?

Yes, relative to where they used to be.


Edited by leggedstruggle (09 Sep 2015 11.51am)

Examples???

Gay Marriage; cuts to the armed forces; the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; protecting the overseas aid budget; record £8 billion a year to the NHS for the next five years. Corbyn would be proud of all these policies.

Sorry but how are Gay Marriage, Cuts to the Armed forces in a period of government austerity, economic migration that benefits business left wing (which it probably couldn't have done anything about).

If I remember rightly it was the conservatives who first decriminalized Homosexuality.

You mean its 'not Tebbit right'.

This is a pointless discussion really. If the Tories had abolished the monarchy yesterday, you would still call that a right wing action simply because the Tories did it. Of course the Conservative Party is broadly speaking 'right wing', but these things are relative. My original point was that it has moved to the left over the years, whereas Labour has moved to the right. Hence the lack of real choice between the major parties and the growing support for smaller parties. A Corbyn led Labour Party would redress this balance somewhat, but as Blair has clearly stated, you simply will not get elected if you are too far to the left.

By the way, the examples I cited certainly seem to have been too left for the ordinary Conservative Party Member: 59 percent opposed gay marriage; 67 percent opposed cuts to the armed forces; 63 percent opposed the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; 67 percent opposed protecting the overseas aid budget.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
sickboy Flag Deal or Croydon 09 Sep 15 2.49pm Send a Private Message to sickboy Add sickboy as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 09 Sep 2015 1.01pm

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Which part of Croydon do you live in Matt? I have said before on this forum that anywhere South of the centre of Croydon is not a sh&thole and the crime rates are extremely low. I do wish people would stop dissing Croydon.

By the way, nothing wrong with much of Thornton Heath when I was a kid but Selhurst had a reputation. No doubt parts of our manor have become nastier in my life time. I ABSOLUTELY would not expect Syrians to make it worse, they are a good bunch. But we did get stuffed with the dodgiest b*stards from many countries, like Yardies, Turkish gangsters, Tamil gangs and Triads. Maybe we could change the discussion to the management of criminals, not 'keeping out Johnny Foreigner'.

Edited by Mapletree (09 Sep 2015 1.02pm)


Hit the nail on the head there in the last paragraph.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 09 Sep 15 3.11pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 2.00pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 12.32pm

Quote pefwin at 09 Sep 2015 12.09pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Sep 2015 11.51am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 11.21am

Quote Willo at 09 Sep 2015 10.19am

The 20,000 Syrians who will come to the UK over the next 5 years will not begin to satisfy the likes of Yvette Cooper and some left-wingers who seemingly want open access for the world's suffering people.

Who are these left wingers who want open access. I thought they wanted the UK to consider people for Asylum who had fled Syria. That isn't open access. The UK turns down 59% of Asylum Applications.

Its not just the left wing. I noticed that a right wing government has being providing money to Syrian refugee relief and already given 5155 Syrians Asylum since the war started.

Have the Conservative party become left wing?

Yes, relative to where they used to be.


Edited by leggedstruggle (09 Sep 2015 11.51am)

Examples???

Gay Marriage; cuts to the armed forces; the refusal to extend restrictions on workers coming from Bulgaria and Romania; protecting the overseas aid budget; record £8 billion a year to the NHS for the next five years. Corbyn would be proud of all these policies.


Jamie beat me to it, it depends on your position. In your case it is about coloureds and queers.

Don't know where you get your reference to 'coloureds' from? I don't necessarily agree with the policies I listed, I merely state them as evidence of the Conservative Party's gradual move to the left of where it was. As for Gay Marriage, I don't really care much about it, apart from when people who do care about it are persecuted.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
susmik Flag PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 09 Sep 15 3.13pm Send a Private Message to susmik Add susmik as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 1.01pm

Quote matt_himself at 09 Sep 2015 12.48pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 09 Sep 2015 9.58am

Quote matt_himself at 09 Sep 2015 8.07am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Sep 2015 3.43pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Sep 2015 1.30pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Sep 2015 1.00pm

We have always had immigrants......At a reasonable level I think there is an element of truth in all that guff the politicians want us to believe about immigration being positive......They all say it like a mantra.

When I say a reasonable level I mean immigration used as a tool to balance the economy........Though I hasten to add not as tool to drive down wages for several already low paid workforces.

Our immigration level should definitely take account of our housing situation.

As a country I truly feel we are sticking our collective heads in the sand over housing provision......We are widening the divide between people.

Many who work just have no realistic chance of owning their home........The baby boomers had the cream of the chances and have screwed it all up for the next generations.

But to go back to my original point, immigration can be positive if it is controlled and takes account of the host population instead of treating them like dumping grounds and culturally rapidly changing the nature of their living spaces......That's what 'freedom of movement' has given us.

People talk about London as being a success story......But they ignore that many many people left London because of rapid change.....Many people whose families had lived there for many generations.

reasonableness and the immigration debate aren't on the same page.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Sep 2015 1.01pm)


London in now rated by respected institutions as the top triple A* city on the globe and the most dynamic followed in second by New York.

Something has gone right there since we were kids. It's a lot more varied colourful and interesting and, unfortunately, expensive but it is truly an amazing metropolis. The people make it fascinating imo.

Respected by whom? Might be ok for wealthy people and visitors, pretty awful for ordinary people. I hear they are are fleeing to the likes of Devon.

My London friends are "ordinary people". They love the place. But I will tell them they are wrong and it is pretty awful for them.

Depends where you go in London. Some of its a s**thole, other parts are ok and some parts are really nice.

Certainly immigration is neither negative or positive, its both, there are pro's and cons, and even some of those pros and cons vary according to how immigration affects you.

The truth is that if you live in a South London say Bermondsey estate or council block, then its probably a negative experience immigration and refugees, but then you're already in one of the most negative aspects of London life anyhow. Its just now you can blame the immigrants, rather than the Housing Crisis, prices in London etc.

But in truth, even without the refugees, you're still in a s**ty place, that's always been s**ty. Places like Thorton Heath, Peckham haven't really been made worse by Immigration and Ayslum, they were always s**t.


The last paragraph is either based on ignorance or hopeless devotion to multiculturalism.

Unfortunately immigration has made places like Thornton Heath worse. There are separate communities living in the same area who view each other as from the moon. The area is far less looked after than 25 years ago, largely due to the number of transient inhabitants. There is more crime and no go areas. Places that brough the community together, like pubs, are now shut down.

Unfortunately you don't get to see this unless you live in the area.

My family come from the area, Thorton Heath has always been a s**t hole, Croydon has always been crap as has Peckham. They've also always had high crime rates. They're worse now definitely, but its not just immigration, the death of Industry in the UK really created problems of low wages and unemployment in South London.

The crime is different to some extent, but South London has always had a problem with Gangs, right back since the 60s. The Flying Squad identified South London as being a principle location of threat for Armed Robbery.

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.

I'm relying on what my family who lived in the area, and still live in the area have told me about it. Basically its worse, but it was always bad. I spend quite a bit of time in and around the area, and my wife lived up in Eltham and Catford for about six years before moving to Reading.

I don't have to live there to know its s**t, my family moved away from Peckham and Bermondsey in the 50s and 60s because it was a crime ridden s**t hole and they could afford to move to a council estate in Dulwich.

I never said it wasn't s**tier or worse, but that those areas have always been s**t anyhow. Pouring more and more immigrants into the area hasn't helped.

Thank god the 80s wasn't full of gangs of youths and men turning up places kicking the s**t out of each other and occasionally killing one another. I must have imagined that football hooliganism that was going on.

Basically, these areas are s**tholes that have only gotten s**tier over time, and generally people who can afford to move away.


I am afraid it has not helped any area in the country to be honest!!!

 


Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 09 Sep 15 3.26pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 09 Sep 2015 1.01pm

People tend to romanticize the past. Violence was common place in the 70s and 80s, in a way it isn't now, and it was largely much more tolerated. Youths fighting youths in the streets isn't a new thing.

As for the pubs shutting down, that's a phenomena that has even affect largely white areas. Even out in the countryside of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, we are seeing the same thing.


I find your position on this ignorant and patronising.

You don't live in the area yet you are telling those of us that do that we are wrong to say that immigration has made he area s***ter. Even immigrants who live there say this.

Gang culture is completely different from the sixties so your 'wiki fact' is also wrong.

It's unbelievable that you choose this line of response when the truth is so opposite from it.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Which part of Croydon do you live in Matt? I have said before on this forum that anywhere South of the centre of Croydon is not a sh&thole and the crime rates are extremely low. I do wish people would stop dissing Croydon.

By the way, nothing wrong with much of Thornton Heath when I was a kid but Selhurst had a reputation. No doubt parts of our manor have become nastier in my life time. I ABSOLUTELY would not expect Syrians to make it worse, they are a good bunch. But we did get stuffed with the dodgiest b*stards from many countries, like Yardies, Turkish gangsters, Tamil gangs and Triads. Maybe we could change the discussion to the management of criminals, not 'keeping out Johnny Foreigner'.

Edited by Mapletree (09 Sep 2015 1.02pm)


I split my time between my place near Whitgift School and the Missus place which is just off of Whitehorse Road.

No where did I blame the Syrians for the problems in the area, so I don't know where you got that from.

I am blaming unmanaged immigration for destroying areas and communities. I am blaming various governments for encouraging immigration without forethought on how that would affect the people living isn't eh areas where immigration happened (both existing and immigrant communities have been affected). I am also, controversially, blaming some immigrant communities for not integrating with others and treating their living environment appallingly. Walk down from West Croydon Bus Atation to the Factory Lane Post Office and you will find all manner of shot piled up on the streets because the immigrant community could not give a stuff about the local environment.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 67 of 85 < 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > No more immigrants.