You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > new migrant crisis
November 23 2024 11.00pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

new migrant crisis

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 61 of 143 < 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 >

  

dannyboy1978 Flag 15 Oct 20 7.32am Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Being demcratic countries who actually voted for mass immigration? This has been done for an agenda, why? Not sure but it's all going wrong and the left are to blame.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 15 Oct 20 9.19am

Originally posted by dannyboy1978
This has been done for an agenda, why?

The left for votes and to make them feel good (and because they hate themselves)
The fake right for short term financial gain
Globalists for long term financial gain

It's a sick joke that lefties still think that they are going up against "the establishment" by pushing for open borders. They have been the establishment for years.

You also need to look at individuals behind the organisations that push this and you may start to notice patterns.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 15 Oct 20 9.32am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

I am not surprised at the criminal element involved here.

We are told that people traffickers charge thousands to move these migrants. They are coming from poor countries so where did they get the money from?

My guess is that some of these "victims" are actually criminals who are sponsored by their gang or they are dragged into it in order to pay for their trafficking.

The sooner we stop this trade in human misery the better. Once we have then I am all for the government taking genuine vetted refugees from the camps.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Oct 20 9.41am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I am not surprised at the criminal element involved here.

We are told that people traffickers charge thousands to move these migrants. They are coming from poor countries so where did they get the money from?

My guess is that some of these "victims" are actually criminals who are sponsored by their gang or they are dragged into it in order to pay for their trafficking.

The sooner we stop this trade in human misery the better. Once we have then I am all for the government taking genuine vetted refugees from the camps.

Suspect a lot of people are forced into working off the debt when they get here.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 15 Oct 20 9.44am

Originally posted by Badger11

I am not surprised at the criminal element involved here.

We are told that people traffickers charge thousands to move these migrants. They are coming from poor countries so where did they get the money from?

My guess is that some of these "victims" are actually criminals who are sponsored by their gang or they are dragged into it in order to pay for their trafficking.

The sooner we stop this trade in human misery the better. Once we have then I am all for the government taking genuine vetted refugees from the camps.

It's not our responsibility to solve other countries problems and how many "refugees" ever go back to their country of origin? I would suggest about none.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 15 Oct 20 10.06am Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

With the UK having a falling birthrate, and an increasingly aged population who use up resources, the UK was going to need migrant labour to make NI, tax and pension contributions.
Trouble is, a lot of illegal migrants are turned into forced labour and criminal activities by crime gangs who make no such contributions to the UK economy. And they use up even more resources with single parent women with children, who are largely reliant on benefits.
Perhaps we can use the soon-to-be redundant French fishing fleet (see link) to patrol the English Channel, towing migrant boats back to Calais, or other deterrent actions.

[Link]

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (15 Oct 2020 10.09am)

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyboy1978 Flag 15 Oct 20 12.56pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

With the UK having a falling birthrate, and an increasingly aged population who use up resources, the UK was going to need migrant labour to make NI, tax and pension contributions.
Trouble is, a lot of illegal migrants are turned into forced labour and criminal activities by crime gangs who make no such contributions to the UK economy. And they use up even more resources with single parent women with children, who are largely reliant on benefits.
Perhaps we can use the soon-to-be redundant French fishing fleet (see link) to patrol the English Channel, towing migrant boats back to Calais, or other deterrent actions.

[Link]

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (15 Oct 2020 10.09am)

I don't really buy this falling birth rate rubbish. We have increased our population by millions and are now over two trillion in debt so it didn't work did it!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 15 Oct 20 3.28pm

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

I don't really buy this falling birth rate rubbish. We have increased our population by millions and are now over two trillion in debt so it didn't work did it!!

We are told at the same time that our ageing population is a problem but *we* mustn't have kids because it's bad for the environment. At the same time we import 3rd worlders hugely increasing their own carbon footprint and they have 5 kids and sit on benefits. The answer to this is apparently to keep borrowing and taxing *us* and pumping more money each year into the NHS and the welfare state.

There is a word for this and it's called genocide.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 15 Oct 20 5.45pm

It's fairly noticeable now how the more liberal types avoid this thread. Like I said before, liberalism has run out of excuses.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 15 Oct 20 6.49pm Send a Private Message to SW19 CPFC Add SW19 CPFC as a friend

Originally posted by W12

We are told at the same time that our ageing population is a problem but *we* mustn't have kids because it's bad for the environment. At the same time we import 3rd worlders hugely increasing their own carbon footprint and they have 5 kids and sit on benefits. The answer to this is apparently to keep borrowing and taxing *us* and pumping more money each year into the NHS and the welfare state.

There is a word for this and it's called genocide.

Genocide. Exaggerate much? You’re of course entitled to your angry w*** armageddon esque prediction of a 95% imported population of foreigns in the not too distant future with the rest of ‘us’ having fled to the costa del brit (oh the irony) but let’s not be moronic with our hyperbolic comparisons eh?

Not sure who is telling you not to have kids - yes it’s environmentally better not to have them but in reality 1 or 2 children per family in a developed country is beneficial for many reasons. Unless you can find me an example, the no kids message is hardly frontline mainstream government messaging.

I’d argue wanting to claim money back from the state for not using the NHS and educational systems is just as bad as a workshy gaming the benefits system.

Importing developing countries workers - when you say ‘hugely’ increasing carbon footprints - what are you referring to? The flight over? If they were commuting to and from Eastern Europe every day then fine. In reality they probably end up living 6 to a squalid house with low, shared use of energy, food and carbon intensive behaviour.

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 15 Oct 20 7.28pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

Genocide. Exaggerate much? You’re of course entitled to your angry w*** armageddon esque prediction of a 95% imported population of foreigns in the not too distant future with the rest of ‘us’ having fled to the costa del brit (oh the irony) but let’s not be moronic with our hyperbolic comparisons eh?

Not sure who is telling you not to have kids - yes it’s environmentally better not to have them but in reality 1 or 2 children per family in a developed country is beneficial for many reasons. Unless you can find me an example, the no kids message is hardly frontline mainstream government messaging.

I’d argue wanting to claim money back from the state for not using the NHS and educational systems is just as bad as a workshy gaming the benefits system.

Importing developing countries workers - when you say ‘hugely’ increasing carbon footprints - what are you referring to? The flight over? If they were commuting to and from Eastern Europe every day then fine. In reality they probably end up living 6 to a squalid house with low, shared use of energy, food and carbon intensive behaviour.

There you go w12.
Your wish is sw's command

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 15 Oct 20 8.32pm

Originally posted by cryrst

There you go w12.
Your wish is sw's command

Thought I might ignite some white guilt. You have me banged to rights.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 61 of 143 < 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > new migrant crisis