This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
crvenaeagle 14 May 19 4.50am | |
---|---|
Kinda surprised how many people have their tail up at this prospect, with comparisons drawn between City and our potential future. What merit does success have when it's been bought? Those Qataris were the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 14 May 19 5.03am | |
---|---|
Interesting that all the information seems to be coming out through his associate, Miti Tiyapairat, who as a former Director of a Thai League One club appears to imagine himself as an Executive at Palace if the deal goes through. He does have the grace to admit it would be a bit different to what he's known....
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Stirlingsays 14 May 19 5.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by briandavis
I'm in Thailand. Here's a link from the main newspaper, Bangkok Post.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
briandavis Udon Thani 14 May 19 5.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crvenaeagle
Kinda surprised how many people have their tail up at this prospect, with comparisons drawn between City and our potential future. What merit does success have when it's been bought? Those Qataris were the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 14 May 19 5.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crvenaeagle
Kinda surprised how many people have their tail up at this prospect, with comparisons drawn between City and our potential future. What merit does success have when it's been bought? Those Qataris were the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football. We already made the grade on your last bit.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
briandavis Udon Thani 14 May 19 6.06am | |
---|---|
I understand and sympathise with your viewpoint and have said much the same in my time. It's a sentiment even expressed as long ago in the introduction to "We All Follow the Palace". We hope there's still space for bringing through youth players, retaining our 'local' club feel etc. Unfortunately, particularly at the top, it's becaome so much about money. Would Man City be where they are without it, would Leicester have become Champions? etc. Look at the ridiculous amounts of money to buy the top players - and wages to go with it. Now Palace want to improve the ground, but everyone agrees that standing still on players is asking for trouble. It's a balancing act and perhaps the Club, without openly admitting it, must secure more investment to try and progress. Whatever occurs, let's hope Palace fans can always identify closely with the Club.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 14 May 19 6.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crvenaeagle
Kinda surprised how many people have their tail up at this prospect, with comparisons drawn between City and our potential future. What merit does success have when it's been bought? Those Qataris were the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football. We could only spend more on players if we increase our non-TV income significantly and we can only do that with an improved infrastructure. It's looking increasing unlikely that this will happen under the current ownership as most of our income is eaten up by our wage bill and, whilst they may be billionaires, the US investors don't seem overly keen to invest for the long-term. We need an owner(s) who can make the improvements we need happen now, rather than a vanity project at some (now) unspecified future date. If that means an owner(s) from the eastern half of the globe, provided the intentions are sound, I can't really see the problem.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sherlock II The Big Mango 14 May 19 7.22am | |
---|---|
You are correct, Thaksin is a folk hero in the poorer north and north east of Thailand and the working class areas of Bangkok where his social programs gave dignity to the poor and the downtrodden. He might be corrupt but, as you say, so are most high up the food chain in Thailand. I think he would invest some of his fortune in the playing side and attract a lot of support to the club from not only within Thailand but also from China where he has extensive interests and from where his family originally came. And, of course, his sister the lovely Yingluck would be a welcome visitor to Selhurst Park. Originally posted by BeckenhamSteve
He fled Thailand to avoid corruption charges and imprisonment, that being said that's nothing unusual for Thailand. He is a very popular politician (exiled) with the poorer Thais in the North East of Thailand and he is extremely wealthy, making his money from telecommunication. I think he would be genuine in his intentions towards Palace as it would suit his aims of raising his profile in Thailand but I'm not sure if it would last in the long term. He had a very aggressive attitude to repeat drug offenders in Thailand when he was PM and I'm not sure if this would sit easily with the Premier League as "Fit And Proper Person"? Edited by Sherlock II (14 May 2019 7.36am)
Originally Sherlock, the Holmesdale Online class Of 2001 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
orpingtoneagle Orpington 14 May 19 7.45am | |
---|---|
Thai politics comes with a constant shift of corruption but this guy and his wider ft Emily took it to levels where even the authorities there decided to take action. Do we really want to see our club run by someone who, however rich faces arrest and imprisonment in a country he once ran? Is the lure of a bit more money worth it? Not for me. For every guy like the late owner of Leicester there is a Vincent Tan.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
RyWa Beckenham 14 May 19 8.07am | |
---|---|
Everyone speaking like this means we'll suddenly spend money.. our current owners have a combined net worth of nearly 5 billion, thats alot more than this Thai bloke. Edited by RyWa (14 May 2019 8.07am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 14 May 19 8.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crvenaeagle
What merit does success have when it's been bought? Those Qataris were the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football. I think that Sky provided the biggest nail in the coffin of modern football
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 14 May 19 8.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by RyWa
Nobody gets as rich as him without knowing something about the investments that he buys into
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.