You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US Presidential Election
November 23 2024 9.09am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

US Presidential Election

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 31 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

  

nairb75 Flag Baltimore 19 Sep 16 3.24pm Send a Private Message to nairb75 Add nairb75 as a friend

Originally posted by topcat

The establishment don't care who wins as they always come out on top.

Even if Trump got in, do you think anything would actually change? If he tried to implement any of his daft ideas, he would be blocked by Congress. Whilst his party hold a large majority, a lot of them don't like him and wouldn't necessarily back him.

he'll pass cuts for the rich first thing. he'd get congress to sign off.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 19 Sep 16 4.00pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Originally posted by matt_himself

Pastor Manning on Obama:

[Link]

A couple of examples of the man's insight.

In 2013, Manning accused Obama of having a “love child” and then shooting the mother outside the White House.

In 2014, he prognosticated that Obama and Vladimir Putin would be outed as gay within 100 days.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 19 Sep 16 4.04pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Doubling the US debt is hardly 'cleaning up'. (Pumping Wall Street with QE money cannot in any way qualify as a recovery.)
Unemployment figures also appear to be far higher than the 'official' 4.9%, and Food Stamp usage has also risen under Obama.

Achievements? Hmmm........

Has any president since Roosevelt come into office with the country in a worse economic condition than Obama following the Republican party banking crisis?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 20 Sep 16 6.26am

Has any president since Roosevelt come into office with the country in a worse economic condition than Obama following the Republican party banking crisis?

A fair point and no, but my post was in relation to the claim that Obama has 'cleaned up the economy'.
Despite borrowing more than every single former President combined and virtually doubling the US debt since he took over from Bush, he hasn't come close to solving the s***-storm he inherited.
He and his cronies (The Fed) have made things a whole lot worse. Well, for 99% of us.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Sep 16 3.43pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Doubling the US debt is hardly 'cleaning up'. (Pumping Wall Street with QE money cannot in any way qualify as a recovery.)
Unemployment figures also appear to be far higher than the 'official' 4.9%, and Food Stamp usage has also risen under Obama.

Achievements? Hmmm........

Well the "doubling of the debt" meme is a very simplistic view of what has happened to the US economy. Looking at a single measure and using it to damn an entire Presidency is foolish.

Before the election even happened, the US (and world) economy was in freefall. It's been estimated that the 2008 crash cost the US economy as much as $17 trillion. The US debt exploded, not because of TARP or other recovery measures, but because The Bush tax cuts had shredded tax revenue - which then plummeted further as the economy sank - and the Iraq/Afghanistan wars which Bush had always kept off the books, i.e. it was never a budget item but funded on the fly by special appropriations.

I have attached a graph that shows how each of these extraneous - non-Obama policy related costs helped heap debt on the US.

Debt-graph-CBPP.jpeg Attachment: Debt-graph-CBPP.jpeg (245.58Kb)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Sep 16 3.48pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

Exactly and his immigration policy or lack of has been woeful.


Immigration is a good point. Bi-partisan reform has stalled in the House even though it has the votes to pass. The Republican leadership - Boener then Ryan - refuse to allow a vote because they do not want to be seen to help Obama get anything done. The bill has already passed the Senate and Obama said he would sign it immediately upon passage in the House.

Meanwhile, he has enforcing the existing, bad, laws harder than any President before him. Lately he has tried to use what authority he has to soften the approach to certain types - especially families who came here illegally but have since had kids - but he is getting push back there too.

Immigration policy is a mess.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 21 Sep 16 4.17pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

Well the "doubling of the debt" meme is a very simplistic view of what has happened to the US economy. Looking at a single measure and using it to damn an entire Presidency is foolish.

Before the election even happened, the US (and world) economy was in freefall. It's been estimated that the 2008 crash cost the US economy as much as trillion. The US debt exploded, not because of TARP or other recovery measures, but because The Bush tax cuts had shredded tax revenue - which then plummeted further as the economy sank - and the Iraq/Afghanistan wars which Bush had always kept off the books, i.e. it was never a budget item but funded on the fly by special appropriations.

I have attached a graph that shows how each of these extraneous - non-Obama policy related costs helped heap debt on the US.

Agreed, which is why i also mentioned unemployment figures along with increasing food stamp usage. Obama is also the first US President ever to fail to reach at least 3% GDP growth figures in a single year. That can also be thrown into the mix.

Yes, he inherited a s***storm of an economy, we all know that, but to claim his economic policies have been a success is also 'foolish'. The economic situation he inherited is nothing compared to the economic situation he's leaving.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Sep 16 4.48pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Agreed, which is why i also mentioned unemployment figures along with increasing food stamp usage. Obama is also the first US President ever to fail to reach at least 3% GDP growth figures in a single year. That can also be thrown into the mix.

Yes, he inherited a s***storm of an economy, we all know that, but to claim his economic policies have been a success is also 'foolish'. The economic situation he inherited is nothing compared to the economic situation he's leaving.

Seriously?

jobs_110615_chart1.png Attachment: jobs_110615_chart1.png (47.44Kb)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rubin Flag 22 Sep 16 8.31am Send a Private Message to Rubin Add Rubin as a friend

Here's such a great chap, is Barack:

[Link]

He's supposedly doing it as he's scared to provoke Saudi, yet doesn't mind continually provoking Russia.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rubin Flag 22 Sep 16 8.39am Send a Private Message to Rubin Add Rubin as a friend

Just imagine the media reaction if Trump was exposed for doing something such as pocketing nearly 100% of aid money donated for a natural disaster:

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 22 Sep 16 9.19am

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

The economic situation he inherited is nothing compared to the economic situation he's leaving.

Seriously?

Yeah, I believe so.
I've nothing against Obama, but let's not over-egg the pudding when it comes to his 'economic achievements' when many statistics (unfortunately) tell us a different story.
That's all i'm saying.


 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Sep 16 9.54am

Originally posted by topcat

The establishment don't care who wins as they always come out on top.

Even if Trump got in, do you think anything would actually change? If he tried to implement any of his daft ideas, he would be blocked by Congress. Whilst his party hold a large majority, a lot of them don't like him and wouldn't necessarily back him.

Well technically, whoever wins becomes a part of the establishment by definition. This is because the system of democracy is largely a fictional construct aimed at perpetuation of a status quo, rather than as a means of change. Its more notable in the US, but effectively, a similar situation here, the system represents interests in the UK, not the interests of the UK population.

As evidenced by the fact that UKIP (who I don't support) can get twice as many votes as the Liberal Democrats, and get 1/10th the positions in parliament.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 6 of 31 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US Presidential Election