This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
legaleagle 21 Jun 15 11.00am | |
---|---|
. Edited by legaleagle (21 Jun 2015 11.01am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 21 Jun 15 11.02am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 21 Jun 2015 10.12am
I am of the right. But simple labels are just that. If I were to categorize myself I suppose I'd say 'red tory'. I'm British working class and I reckon I stick up for them far more than you egalitarians do. Lets go over my 'lefty' elements that I've supported on these boards. I don't agree with state allowed protection of wealth that lowers social mobility and harms the very notion of meritocracy. I'd ban private schools. There you go.....I regard people who only fall into 'left' or 'right' categorises, in the political party sense..... as political sheep. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Jun 2015 10.20am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
derben 21 Jun 15 11.05am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 21 Jun 2015 11.02am
Quote Stirlingsays at 21 Jun 2015 10.12am
I am of the right. But simple labels are just that. If I were to categorize myself I suppose I'd say 'red tory'. I'm British working class and I reckon I stick up for them far more than you egalitarians do. Lets go over my 'lefty' elements that I've supported on these boards. I don't agree with state allowed protection of wealth that lowers social mobility and harms the very notion of meritocracy. I'd ban private schools. There you go.....I regard people who only fall into 'left' or 'right' categorises, in the political party sense..... as political sheep. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Jun 2015 10.20am)
I agree we should have a blanket term; I would suggest 'politically correct twerps'.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 21 Jun 15 11.12am | |
---|---|
Quote derben at 21 Jun 2015 11.05am
Quote legaleagle at 21 Jun 2015 11.02am
Quote Stirlingsays at 21 Jun 2015 10.12am
I am of the right. But simple labels are just that. If I were to categorize myself I suppose I'd say 'red tory'. I'm British working class and I reckon I stick up for them far more than you egalitarians do. Lets go over my 'lefty' elements that I've supported on these boards. I don't agree with state allowed protection of wealth that lowers social mobility and harms the very notion of meritocracy. I'd ban private schools. There you go.....I regard people who only fall into 'left' or 'right' categorises, in the political party sense..... as political sheep. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Jun 2015 10.20am)
I agree we should have a blanket term; I would suggest 'politically correct twerps'. I thought you might be one for blanket labels. "politically correct twerps" or "politically incorrect different word beginning with t's"?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 21 Jun 15 11.19am | |
---|---|
Quote skj at 20 Jun 2015 2.09pm
Clarkson caught trying to get in dressed as the ginger.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Jun 15 11.54am | |
---|---|
Quote derben at 21 Jun 2015 10.57am
Good post Stirling, I agree with most of your ideas here. I too regard myself as 'left' in a number of areas - further left by a mile in wanting to promote the interests of the British working class than members of the new left/libs are. The new left is more interested in protecting the interests of various minorities, Palestinians, asylum seeks etc. They actually are contemptuous of ordinary British working class people (unless they have some ethnic 'heritage' of course). Edited by derben (21 Jun 2015 10.57am)
I had a respect for the old Labour party in so much as it truly looked to the British working classes first without exception. The infection with the modern left is about being a 'world citizen' and egalitarian. A playful mindset that I believe worsens the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable here. I respect and support helping nations abroad to a reasonable degree by virtue of being a good neigbour and by expressing humanity....in for example situations of natural disasters......And I agree for example that while we shouldn't take them in we shouldn't let people knowingly drown in the Med without trying to help. But first and fulmost the responsibility of any political wing of any party should be to those here....paying taxes with allegiance to this country. One of the places where this country has gone seriously wrong is in the ignoring of allegiance....The downplaying of allegiance and commitment to this country. This idea that everyone is of equal standing independent of how they regard this land. It stabs at the very best in this country. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Jun 2015 11.54am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Jun 15 12.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 21 Jun 2015 11.02am
However, when using the term generally I'm perfectly right to use those terms.....Because collectively I believe those categories exist and are in the majority in the areas I describe. Labels are fine to use when generalizing.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pikester Worthing 21 Jun 15 5.08pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 17 Jun 2015 5.30pm
Quote topcat at 17 Jun 2015 4.57pm
Good choice. Clarkson fans wouldn't have been happy with anyone except Clarkson. Max Mosley perhaps but I think he may be dead so possibly not an inspired choice. It's bad enough to insinuate that Max (not dead) is his father, nevermind that Clarkson is or that's what his fans would want.
You fed me, you bred me, I'll remember your name. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 21 Jun 15 9.11pm | |
---|---|
Quote Pikester at 21 Jun 2015 5.08pm
Quote Stuk at 17 Jun 2015 5.30pm
Quote topcat at 17 Jun 2015 4.57pm
Good choice. Clarkson fans wouldn't have been happy with anyone except Clarkson. Max Mosley perhaps but I think he may be dead so possibly not an inspired choice. It's bad enough to insinuate that Max (not dead) is the same as his father was, nevermind that Clarkson is or that's what his fans would want.
I probably should have written it as edited above. Which is what I think topcat meant.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 22 Jun 15 12.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 20 Jun 2015 11.46am
Quote Stuk at 19 Jun 2015 12.42pm
Quote TheJudge at 19 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Yes I mean Quentin. Thank goodness you pointed that out. There might have been a planet wide crisis.
Good on Ched finding a new job after all his troubles, and with a payrise to boot.
I think your connection with Victor Meldrew was missed first time.... I fear your Ched Evans connection has gone the same way.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 11 Feb 16 11.37am | |
---|---|
Someone at the BBC is in tick box heaven with this new line up!
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Feb 16 11.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Quote derben at 21 Jun 2015 10.57am
Good post Stirling, I agree with most of your ideas here. I too regard myself as 'left' in a number of areas - further left by a mile in wanting to promote the interests of the British working class than members of the new left/libs are. The new left is more interested in protecting the interests of various minorities, Palestinians, asylum seeks etc. They actually are contemptuous of ordinary British working class people (unless they have some ethnic 'heritage' of course). Edited by derben (21 Jun 2015 10.57am)
I had a respect for the old Labour party in so much as it truly looked to the British working classes first without exception. The infection with the modern left is about being a 'world citizen' and egalitarian. A playful mindset that I believe worsens the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable here. I respect and support helping nations abroad to a reasonable degree by virtue of being a good neigbour and by expressing humanity....in for example situations of natural disasters......And I agree for example that while we shouldn't take them in we shouldn't let people knowingly drown in the Med without trying to help. But first and fulmost the responsibility of any political wing of any party should be to those here....paying taxes with allegiance to this country. One of the places where this country has gone seriously wrong is in the ignoring of allegiance....The downplaying of allegiance and commitment to this country. This idea that everyone is of equal standing independent of how they regard this land. It stabs at the very best in this country. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Jun 2015 11.54am) I kind of agree with a lot of this, though I do believe that to some degree the UK has a global responsibility, as well as a national one, given the increasingly global nature of politics - Which is odd given that I don't actually really subscribe to notions of National Identity and Nationalism, the reality is that representation must first and foremost be to the electorate, and not unelected interest groups, business or lobbyists etc. A part of the problem with the right wing politics (including New Labour) has been to increasingly rely on third party influence, especially corporate and lobby interests on policy, over the electorate, and couple this with a reduction of the responsibility of state to its citizens, tax paying or otherwise, to charities - which have increasingly gained political power and status (even if its a 'good cause'). Take homelessness (for the left) increasingly this was something the state provided provision for through charitable organisations - when the responsibility for citizen welfare is a responsibility of the state - not business or charities. Similarly, the right has seen privatisation as a means of providing 'essential functions of state' (prisons, utilities). In doing so, this has abdicated the 'social contract' between citizens and state, to unelected and largely unaccountable, third parties, who have as such increased their political influence beyond that of the electorate.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.