This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Socialism in action
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
legaleagle  13 Jun 15 11.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| derben 13 Jun 15 12.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 12.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 elgrande bedford 13 Jun 15 12.34pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| legaleagle 13 Jun 15 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| elgrande bedford 13 Jun 15 12.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 1.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.46pm
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.
Didn't say you did, but I still think some project the whole jihadi thing and use it to judge swathes of people.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| derben 13 Jun 15 1.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 1.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| elgrande bedford 13 Jun 15 2.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 1.55pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| derben 13 Jun 15 2.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 2.00pm
Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 1.55pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm
Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am
Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.
She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge. Hardly something she should be proud of. Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud.. You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree. I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.
You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.
Thanks elgrande, saved me the trouble of posting a similar answer. But in response to nicks' silly questions:
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.