This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
The groover Danbury 29 Feb 24 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Politicians need to encourage more British people to work in the NHS. It's a process. Those working for the NHS represent a tiny percentage of migrants. The rest of your excuses are not credible. There are too many people coming here, it is that simple. Numbers needs to be reduced significantly, and our borders must be better controlled.
Not just here. Judging by the rise of right wing parties in parts of the EU, including France, Germany and Holland. Unless this issue is addressed we could soon see a right wing government in a major EU country. I find it really funny that instead of listening and addressing the issues causing this the left simply talks of banning these parties!!!! This is how we ended up leaving the EU. They didn't want to listen and simply stated that those wanting to leave were right wing racists!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 29 Feb 24 11.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The canard that we must have immigration at the current levels to support the NHS is of course a lie by the left to deflect from the clear and obvious serious problems of mass immigration. The NHS employs around 1.7 million people, about 250,000 are from overseas. Immigration is running at around 1.2 million per year, vastly in excess of the numbers supposedly needed to keep the NHS running. You need to get your facts right, rather than regurgitating right-wing tropes. 1.2 million arrived. 0.5 million emigrated. The net figure was 672,000 which was nevertheless historically very high. Of those 33% were on working visas, predominantly for the health and care sectors. 39% were though for study visas. Students mostly return home after their courses end.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 29 Feb 24 11.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The groover
Not just here. Judging by the rise of right wing parties in parts of the EU, including France, Germany and Holland. Unless this issue is addressed we could soon see a right wing government in a major EU country. I find it really funny that instead of listening and addressing the issues causing this the left simply talks of banning these parties!!!! This is how we ended up leaving the EU. They didn't want to listen and simply stated that those wanting to leave were right wing racists! The only place I have heard any suggestion of a ban is in one area of Germany where a local branch of the AfD has gone too far in some of its actions. Not the whole of the AfD! We need to hear the arguments and ensure that those who believe them get represented. So banning them is in no one's interest. You don't beat bad arguments by suppressing them. You beat them with better arguments.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 29 Feb 24 11.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You need to get your facts right, rather than regurgitating right-wing tropes. 1.2 million arrived. 0.5 million emigrated. The net figure was 672,000 which was nevertheless historically very high. Of those 33% were on working visas, predominantly for the health and care sectors. 39% were though for study visas. Students mostly return home after their courses end. Remember the good old days when foreign students would come here to study and either return home to improve their countries or get well paid meaningful employment here, paying taxes and contributing to British society? And then somebody realised that there were an awful lot of bogus educational establishments offering fake degrees to foreign students who would neither go home nor add anything to the UK…
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 29 Feb 24 12.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Politicians need to encourage more British people to work in the NHS. It's a process. Those working for the NHS represent a tiny percentage of migrants. The rest of your excuses are not credible. There are too many people coming here, it is that simple. Numbers needs to be reduced significantly, and our borders must be better controlled.
Rather worryingly a recent report claims that 1/3 of people who came to work in the UK in the care sector are actually doing other jobs instead. It doesn't surprise me I have no faith that anybody in authority is checking that people are sticking to their work permits.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Feb 24 12.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The canard that we must have immigration at the current levels to support the NHS is of course a lie by the left to deflect from the clear and obvious serious problems of mass immigration. The NHS employs around 1.7 million people, about 250,000 are from overseas. Immigration is running at around 1.2 million per year, vastly in excess of the numbers supposedly needed to keep the NHS running. It's still over 15% of the staff, which is significant by any definition - certainly not an amount that's easily replaced and you could absolutely say the NHS is reliant on them. A lot of people will obviously emigrate with their partners and family, so if we need 250,000 staff, the number of immigrants is always going to be above that. We also have a further 100,000 vacancies within the NHS and it's barely functioning as a service currently. I can understand people's concerns with immigration in principle, but I struggle to see how you make up those type of numbers any other way in practice. We have an ageing population, the tax burden continues to increase and as a nation we don't have enough kids to sustain it. There's a huge overlap between people who vehemently argued against public sector pay rises and are strongly anti-immigration - it feels like we want to have our cake and eat it.
Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (29 Feb 2024 12.17pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 29 Feb 24 12.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
It's still over 15% of the staff, which is significant by any definition - certainly not an amount that's easily replaced and you could absolutely say the NHS is reliant on them. A lot of people will obviously emigrate with their partners and family, so if we need 250,000 staff, the number of immigrants is always going to be above that. We also have a further 100,000 vacancies within the NHS and it's barely functioning as a service currently. I can understand people's concerns with immigration in principle, but I struggle to see how you make up those type of numbers any other way in practice. We have an ageing population, the tax burden continues to increase and as a nation we don't have enough kids to sustain it. There's a huge overlap between people who vehemently argued against public sector pay rises and are strongly anti-immigration - it feels like we want to have our cake and eat it.
Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (29 Feb 2024 12.17pm) I would start by linking student fees to the NHS. For every year someone works for the NHS I would reduce their student fees debt so eventually they will pay nothing. This is to stop a qualified staff saying thanks for the freebie taxpayer I'm off to the private sector. I cannot understand why we are penalising people in such a vital sector. I would also review the pension scheme. I think I did a previous post about my GP friend who was being penalised in her NHS pension scheme because she wanted to work on past 60. I would also tell all agencies that the NHS will not pay the ludicrous fees either they cut them or they will not be used. This might cause some short term pain but in the end they will cave. We did this all the time in my old job, the agencies would blow hard but then cave. Anyway just a couple of suggestions oh and more training places. Edited by Badger11 (29 Feb 2024 12.26pm) Edited by Badger11 (29 Feb 2024 12.27pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 29 Feb 24 12.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
It's still over 15% of the staff, which is significant by any definition - certainly not an amount that's easily replaced and you could absolutely say the NHS is reliant on them. A lot of people will obviously emigrate with their partners and family, so if we need 250,000 staff, the number of immigrants is always going to be above that. We also have a further 100,000 vacancies within the NHS and it's barely functioning as a service currently. I can understand people's concerns with immigration in principle, but I struggle to see how you make up those type of numbers any other way in practice. We have an ageing population, the tax burden continues to increase and as a nation we don't have enough kids to sustain it. There's a huge overlap between people who vehemently argued against public sector pay rises and are strongly anti-immigration - it feels like we want to have our cake and eat it. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (29 Feb 2024 12.17pm) It is not a need for 250,000 a year, the figure is those already employed in the NHS. The numbers of any extras that might be needed in addition are necessarily much, much lower. Taking your figures, if a 100,000 vacancies, 15% would be 15,000. Having 15,000 immigrants in a year to fill their share of those vacancies would be far preferable to having 1.2 million random immigrants. It is irresponsible to ignore and incur all the problems mass immigration brings merely to sacrifice to the sacred cow that the NHS is.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Feb 24 12.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I would start by linking student fees to the NHS. For every year someone works for the NHS I would reduce their student fees debt so eventually they will pay nothing. This is to stop a qualified staff saying thanks for the freebie taxpayer I'm off to the private sector. I cannot understand why we are penalising people in such a vital sector. I would also review the pension scheme. I think I did a previous post about my GP friend who was being penalised in her NHS pension scheme because she wanted to work on past 60. I would also tell all agencies that the NHS will not pay the ludicrous fees either they cut them or they will not be used. This might cause some short term pain but in the end they will cave. Anyway just a couple of suggestions oh and more training places. Edited by Badger11 (29 Feb 2024 12.26pm) I think those are decent suggestions. The student loan issue is huge - a qualified medical professional who stays in the UK is going to face a 'real' tax rate north of 50% for decades. That same person can head off to Australia or Canada or plenty of other places, earn a considerably higher salary, and not have the burden of tens of thousands of student loan debt. I think it was about 150,000 staff left the NHS last year - until we can plug that leak, I struggle to see how we reduce our reliance on immigration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Feb 24 12.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
It is not a need for 250,000 a year, the figure is those already employed in the NHS. The numbers of any extras that might be needed in addition are necessarily much, much lower. Taking your figures, if a 100,000 vacancies, 15% would be 15,000. Having 15,000 immigrants in a year to fill their share of those vacancies would be far preferable to having 1.2 million random immigrants. It is irresponsible to ignore and incur all the problems mass immigration brings merely to sacrifice to the sacred cow that the NHS is. We're not training new doctors and nurses at the rate we used to, so it won't only be 15% of those 100,000 vacancies that we need immigration to fill. As I mentioned above, we're also losing something like 150,000 staff a year, so the vacancy rate is going to keep rising until that stops. The reality is it's a s*** deal to be a health professional in the UK at the moment, and there's no logical reason someone choses it as a profession other than just a want to do a good thing... you train for far longer than average, accrue more debt than nearly other profession, to then earn a crap salary and work monstrous hours in one of the most demanding environments you could imagine. Until we change that reality, the immigration stuff just feels like shouting at clouds to me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 29 Feb 24 1.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
We're not training new doctors and nurses at the rate we used to, so it won't only be 15% of those 100,000 vacancies that we need immigration to fill. As I mentioned above, we're also losing something like 150,000 staff a year, so the vacancy rate is going to keep rising until that stops. The reality is it's a s*** deal to be a health professional in the UK at the moment, and there's no logical reason someone choses it as a profession other than just a want to do a good thing... you train for far longer than average, accrue more debt than nearly other profession, to then earn a crap salary and work monstrous hours in one of the most demanding environments you could imagine. Until we change that reality, the immigration stuff just feels like shouting at clouds to me. However the figures are presented, it is absurd to say, as some posters on here do, that current levels of immigration that are way over 1 million people a year are needed to support the NHS.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Feb 24 1.44pm | |
---|---|
I want to deport Brighton.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.