This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 07 Sep 15 5.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.48pm
If I had my way, yes. Obviously there would be financial compensation. Unless they put the houses to the use for which they are intended, ie habitation, rather than as an 'asset' / 'investment'
Far, far, far cheaper to build new houses. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Sep 2015 5.52pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Sep 15 5.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 5.47pm
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.44pm
Yer totally wrong on Corbyn.
It's it just the under belly of the left coming out? Loads of new Labour will leave and vote Tory. There isn't enough actual socialists in England to fill Milton Keynes let alone win an election. Corbyn is unpopular on: The EU
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Sep 15 5.52pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 5.51pm
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.48pm
If I had my way, yes. Obviously there would be financial compensation. Unless they put the houses to the use for which they are intended, ie habitation, rather than as an 'asset' / 'investment'
Far, far, far cheaper to build new houses. But the country is burstingbursting and despite over 90 of land not built on we have no room apparently. . Far better to utilise current stock whilst building new stock.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 07 Sep 15 5.53pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 5.34pm
It isn't good enough for the left to say.....Oh well, money isn't going to be spent on the homeless or the waiting lists so more immigrants and asylum is perfectly ok. The simple truth is that increasing the number of people requiring houses worsens the situation and waiting lists for the rest......It doesn't have minimal impact. The left were meant to stick up for the British working class. The reality is that they don't.....They are egalitarians.....Which is mostly a nice idea but it means that ultimately they don't put British working people first. All they see is working people. They are quite prepared to lower living standards here for the most vulnerable in society to act as the 'world's carer'. The British working class were right to dump Labour long ago......The problem is that Labour are a bit slow on the uptake.....They actually think they are going to win these people back. Labour in England now are not far off of being a jumped up pressure group.....Especially if Corbyn gets in. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Sep 2015 5.39pm) Yes,I know your views Stirling. The left were meant to stick up for the underdog.They weren't, as perversely happened in pre-war in South Africa meant to call for "white workers of the world to unite".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Sep 15 5.54pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.51pm
Not the thread to debate Corbyn. It's hard enough to navigate all the pseudo racist immigration threads as it is.
I love an immigration thread......Probably a little too much.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
oldcodger 07 Sep 15 6.00pm | |
---|---|
A sensible, sober decision from Cameron. Taking 20,000 of the most vulnerable from camps in Syria over a period of five years. A 0.03% increase in population in exchange for completely transforming the lives of kids in dire need. Edited by oldcodger (07 Sep 2015 6.00pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 07 Sep 15 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 07 Sep 2015 5.40pm
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 07 Sep 2015 5.15pm
Going back to the posts original heading. Maybe the attached link is one of the reasons why the British people have had enough of immigration. Yet another Asian gang raping our children! Hope these scum bags get the f@ucking sh@t kicked out of then in prison. Would quite happily do it myself!
Then again, they don't appear to be immigrants or of Asian descent and as we all know "Asians" are predisposed to be child abusers more than "us",so therefore,as the OP said,"no more immigrants"! Edited by legaleagle (07 Sep 2015 5.43pm) No Legal - I don’t think there is anything "funny" at all about this, personally I find it pretty damn disgusting, regardless of where the child rapist come from. Edited by Tom-the-eagle (07 Sep 2015 6.02pm)
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Sep 15 6.01pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 07 Sep 2015 5.53pm
Yes,I know your views Stirling. The left were meant to stick up for the underdog.They weren't, as perversely happened in pre-war in South Africa meant to call for "white workers of the world to unite".
As for your immigration point......240,000.....With net immigration into the country being way higher than that.....240,000 is probably only a catch up of around about 100,000 houses a year. And that's if you could ensure that these houses only went to people who really needed them. I've never made the point that the housing crises is only down to immigration. I've recognised the problem of an aging population and of governments selling off council housing stock and not replacing it. Housing associations have jumped into between the gap.....And they are a much poorer deal for the working class than your old council house. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Sep 2015 6.02pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
farms Thailand / England 07 Sep 15 6.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 07 Sep 2015 4.44pm
Quote farms at 07 Sep 2015 4.24pm
Camemoran is allowing 20k plus more to come here , feel sorry for people on the housing waiting list . How long have you been in Thailand? Do they even still have council waiting lists. I thought these days it was housing benefit, private landlords and housing associations.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Sep 15 6.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.52pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 5.51pm
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.48pm
If I had my way, yes. Obviously there would be financial compensation. Unless they put the houses to the use for which they are intended, ie habitation, rather than as an 'asset' / 'investment'
Far, far, far cheaper to build new houses. But the country is burstingbursting and despite over 90 of land not built on we have no room apparently. . Far better to utilise current stock whilst building new stock.
There is nothing like 90 percent of land suitable for building houses on.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Sep 15 6.06pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 6.01pm
Quote legaleagle at 07 Sep 2015 5.53pm
Yes,I know your views Stirling. The left were meant to stick up for the underdog.They weren't, as perversely happened in pre-war in South Africa meant to call for "white workers of the world to unite".
As for your immigration point......240,000.....With net immigration into the country being way higher than that.....240,000 is probably only a catch up of around about 100,000 houses a year. And that's if you could ensure that these houses only went to people who really needed them. I've never made the point that the housing crises is only down to immigration. I've recognised the problem of an aging population and of governments selling off council housing stock and not replacing it. Housing associations have jumped into between the gap.....And they are a much poorer deal for the working class than your old council house. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Sep 2015 6.02pm) Corbyn is the only (high profile) MP saying this, you agree with it in principle, yet deride him.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Sep 15 6.07pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 6.05pm
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.52pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Sep 2015 5.51pm
Quote nickgusset at 07 Sep 2015 5.48pm
If I had my way, yes. Obviously there would be financial compensation. Unless they put the houses to the use for which they are intended, ie habitation, rather than as an 'asset' / 'investment'
Far, far, far cheaper to build new houses. But the country is burstingbursting and despite over 90 of land not built on we have no room apparently. . Far better to utilise current stock whilst building new stock.
There is nothing like 90 percent of land suitable for building houses on. Nit picking, the point is still the same.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.