This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
CONservative government incompetence.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 22 Feb 24 8.57pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
“Russiagate” was not a hoax. Only the truly gullible who believe the constant lies from Trump believe that. It’s bad enough that so many in the USA fall for this but that anyone here does and repeats it as though it’s a fact is appalling. People were convicted. Mueller never exonerated Trump. He was just stymied from pressing charges by Barr and obstructed by Trump himself. The files still exist. They haven’t been used. Yet! There is enough else to spike him on at the moment. Want to read the other side to Trump’s rhetoric? [Tweet Link]
It seems the whole Hunter Biden laptop story is about to be destroyed as a Republican misinformation sting. Now that’s not getting much attention in the right wing press. Nor it seems is the fact that both Liz Truss and Nigel Farage are over in the USA at a GOP rally, getting cosy with the MAGA nut jobs. Try to listen to the speech that Truss made. It’s an awful rewriting of history in which her failure was all down to the “deep state” conspiring to stop her. It was so Trump like it made my buttocks wince. Couldn’t find it in the right wing press and although it is is the Guardian I know how little regard anything from there is regarded. I did though find this, which gives a flavour. Farage was sitting so close to Truss, with little Union flags in front of them, they could have been holding hands. If this is what the right think is going to appeal to British voters, good luck to the. Truss was followed by Bannon, expressing sympathy for the way she had been treated and promising Trump would not allow it to happen there. Nuts! Edited by Wisbech Eagle (22 Feb 2024 10.35pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Badger11 Beckenham 23 Feb 24 7.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Any day now, any day.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 23 Feb 24 8.21am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Fruits don't just stumble into gay nudist beaches but become fruiter than the fruitiest fruitcake. I must admit, watching this level of TDS is fun now....However watching it if Trump wins in November? I'll be buying a stack of popcorn, the visuals will be good but the cacophonic screeching will be dystopian top tier music. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Feb 2024 8.21am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 24 10.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
The idea that Trump returning to the White House is an opportunity to rival sitting down to watch Jaws again fills me with distain. This isn’t entertainment. This is a very serious threat. Not just to the USA but to us, and the rest of Europe too. It won’t be countered by any supposed emotional meltdowns but by reasoned arguments and legal resistance. Of course the electorate in the USA have the democratic right to choose whoever they wish as their President. That though also assumes they all participate and do so freely knowing that the result will be respected. When any candidate has demonstrated the inability to accept a democratic decision their candidacy ought to be rejected. When any candidate has been convicted of serious crime, and is trying to delay other cases, then their Party ought to reject them and force them to stand as an independent. The ability of a President to pardon himself is a clear and obvious abuse of the rule of law in a democracy and needs to be withdrawn before the upcoming election. For all, or any one, of these reasons Trump ought not to be standing. Whether he will be come election day remain to be seen. On another issue this obsession we see here with “gay nudity” is puzzling. The only time I ever encountered it lasted the briefest of moments and was immediately followed by a rapid retreat. If that’s what floats anyone’s boat though that’s their business and I can provide directions if requested.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 23 Feb 24 10.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
Chomp chomp, munch munch. [Tweet Link]
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 23 Feb 24 5.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is what 14 years of the Conservative party has got for right wing voters in Britain. - Record high levels of immigration, even after Brexit House price conservativism has to take some of the blame for this as those people have continued to reward the Tory move to the social left just as long as it didn't affect their area too much. Now we have a sh1teshow.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Matov 23 Feb 24 10.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
This is what 14 years of the Conservative party has got for right wing voters in Britain. - Record high levels of immigration, even after Brexit House price conservativism has to take some of the blame for this as those people have continued to reward the Tory move to the social left just as long as it didn't affect their area too much. Now we have a sh1teshow. Amen to that. History will not be kind to those arseholes. And people like me, who voted for them, have to take our share of the blame.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 24 10.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is what the unrealistic right thinks would benefit Britain. -curtail the recruitment of those needed to sustain our economy before either ensuring we have reformed the local labour market/benefit culture/education system, or seen the benefit of automation and AI. Carts before horses cause blockages. -allow the unrestricted right to abuse anyone they don't approve of. -allow content dangerous to our children to be spread without controls or standards being imposed. Society sets standards elsewhere. The internet is no different, but the right wants it to be. -remove the right to marry from everyone unless they are approved by certain religious beliefs. Treat those who find themselves locked inside a body that is at odds with their identity without compassion and regard them as either outcasts or property. -deny that supporting the right of any country to freely self-determine its future is the duty of every free nation. Never less so when our interests are also threatened. -control a woman's right to decide what is best for her. There are already standards in place which determine when viability exists and when a woman's rights get superseded. The right wants to ignore them and take control themselves. So much for the "freedom" absolutists!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 georgenorman 23 Feb 24 11.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This is what the unrealistic right thinks would benefit Britain. -curtail the recruitment of those needed to sustain our economy before either ensuring we have reformed the local labour market/benefit culture/education system, or seen the benefit of automation and AI. Carts before horses cause blockages. -allow the unrestricted right to abuse anyone they don't approve of. -allow content dangerous to our children to be spread without controls or standards being imposed. Society sets standards elsewhere. The internet is no different, but the right wants it to be. -remove the right to marry from everyone unless they are approved by certain religious beliefs. Treat those who find themselves locked inside a body that is at odds with their identity without compassion and regard them as either outcasts or property. -deny that supporting the right of any country to freely self-determine its future is the duty of every free nation. Never less so when our interests are also threatened. -control a woman's right to decide what is best for her. There are already standards in place which determine when viability exists and when a woman's rights get superseded. The right wants to ignore them and take control themselves. So much for the "freedom" absolutists! Have you stopped taking your medication again, or are you sniffing gas?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 24 11.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Have you stopped taking your medication again, or are you sniffing gas? Thanks for your concern but I only take statin regularly and that’s easy to remember. I do keep metoclopramide handy though in case I need it after reading your posts.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 24 Feb 24 9.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This is what the unrealistic right thinks would benefit Britain. -curtail the recruitment of those needed to sustain our economy before either ensuring we have reformed the local labour market/benefit culture/education system, or seen the benefit of automation and AI. Carts before horses cause blockages. -allow the unrestricted right to abuse anyone they don't approve of. -allow content dangerous to our children to be spread without controls or standards being imposed. Society sets standards elsewhere. The internet is no different, but the right wants it to be. -remove the right to marry from everyone unless they are approved by certain religious beliefs. Treat those who find themselves locked inside a body that is at odds with their identity without compassion and regard them as either outcasts or property. -deny that supporting the right of any country to freely self-determine its future is the duty of every free nation. Never less so when our interests are also threatened. -control a woman's right to decide what is best for her. There are already standards in place which determine when viability exists and when a woman's rights get superseded. The right wants to ignore them and take control themselves. So much for the "freedom" absolutists! This is what the unrealistic Left thinks would benefit Britain. -allow unlimited and uncontrolled immigration of absolutely anyone, creating a low wage economy, exacerbating the housing crisis, putting strains on health and education services, all while destroying social cohesion and national identity. -cancel anyone whose views they don't approve of. -allow our children to be indoctrinated with left wing dogma and dangerous gender nonsense. -attack traditional family structures and norms with predictable damage to children. Allow men pretending to be women to have unfair advantages ‘competing’ in women’s sports and use women-only facilities to facilitate their sexual deviances. -seek to take away the right of the country to freely self-determine its future by seeking to rejoin the EU. -Allow uncontrolled termination of nascent life while persecuting those that object to it. So much for the "freedom" absolutists!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Feb 24 10.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
The prejudice on display in some posts is creepy. There has always been a vocal minority with this kind of attitude. Alf Garnett might have been a parody but his ghost roams these pages today. Comments in red. Originally posted by georgenorman
This is what the unrealistic Left thinks would benefit Britain. -allow unlimited and uncontrolled immigration of absolutely anyone, creating a low wage economy, exacerbating the housing crisis, putting strains on health and education services, all while destroying social cohesion and national identity. Why on earth would any political party do that? Especially one whose whole purpose is to grow the economy and benefit those on lower wages. Controlled immigration at a level necessary to sustain a healthy economy is the aim. -cancel anyone whose views they don't approve of. Untrue. Defeating bad ideas with better ideas, whilst ensuring public safety is the aim. You need those bad ideas to be heard to defeat them. -allow our children to be indoctrinated with left wing dogma and dangerous gender nonsense. Untrue. Understanding and respecting individuals is the aim. With children that requires the special care of immature minds. Compassion and respect ought to be present in everyone, not just those on the left. The right appear to treat children as possessions to be moulded rather than people to be nurtured. -attack traditional family structures and norms with predictable damage to children. Allow men pretending to be women to have unfair advantages ‘competing’ in women’s sports and use women-only facilities to facilitate their sexual deviances. Untrue. The concept of what comprises a family has expanded and not been destroyed. Turning the clock back to the 1950s is impractical. We must deal with what exists now. How sports handle the consequences of gender dysphoria is a matter for them. Conflating those who genuinely have these issues with sexual deviants is typical of the ignorant right. -seek to take away the right of the country to freely self-determine its future by seeking to rejoin the EU. Untrue. Allowing our representatives to represent us and take whatever decisions they must to serve our best interests is what is required. If that means cooperating with others then so be it. Deciding individual policies by referendum results in chaos. As can be clearly witnessed. We vote for representatives. That’s our function. -Allow uncontrolled termination of nascent life while persecuting those that object to it. Untrue. Allowing women to control their own bodies whilst recognising the existence of viability is the responsible way of managing this. Not pandering to religious beliefs that most don’t share. Those that disagree are free to make their arguments in any way that doesn’t directly impact on the rights of others. So much for the "freedom" absolutists!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.