This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
silvertop Portishead 01 Sep 22 10.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The right-wing Swedish Democrats are now the largest party in the latest poll. The election is in just a few weeks. More and more Swedish are tired of the negatives that neo liberal globalism has introduced into their formerly low crime and socially cohesive country. Edited by silvertop (01 Sep 2022 10.08am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 01 Sep 22 10.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Sweden has an issue with far right, intolerance and racial disharmony. It is also something of an over-bearing Big Brother country and a few people I now who tried to settle there came back.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 01 Sep 22 10.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 01 Sep 22 10.37am | |
---|---|
Money not my God either, I can assure you, Cryrst. I work as a lecturer in an FE college and have had to watch as more and more staff get trimmed, pushing the workload onto the remaining staff. The level of stress in the job is immense as we are teaching the students who didn't make it to uni, are more kinaesthetically minded. In my subject, English, there are those who just don't want to do it and many will refuse, try to be disruptive and even violent in the process: all part of the job. Control in the classroom is a challenge, I can assure you again. As a lecturer, I trained in order to be able to teach: it's a highly - specialised profession yet many lecturers are now employed on a 'sessional' basis ie zero-hours contracts so they're only paid for their time in front of students. All the other, vital, work like prep, marking etc is not paid. That's being employed, essentially, on a casual basis, without the benefits of salaried staff. Now, there are those who say (maybe you are one of them) 'well, you don't go into teaching for the money' and that is true-to a certain extent. I'm afraid, though, that we've reached the point where it seems that the piss is being taken. We carry out an very valuable role in teaching young adults as they prepare for the world of work. The College says they cannot give us more money because 'We are a business and would go into debt'. A business. Yet their funding comes, to a great extent, from the state and that funding has got less and less in real terms over the years and that means the colleges themselves are between a rock and a hard place. Meanwhile, many of the students I teach have parents who do, indeed, go out and seek other jobs. Some have two or three but are still unable to cope financially; I really feel for them, working their butts off like honest citizens but finding themselves in the state they're in. Yet, for all that, I don't despise other workers for taking industrial action. Wages in this country are being driven down further and further and I don't think that's fair. It's not like the workforce over the last 10 years has been militant; far from it. I think they've been very patient. Most worrying is that, before long, young people who are the future of teaching will be saying: "Nah, what's the point of doing that as a profession? I'll find another job to look for", as you suggest, and the young students of this country, the country's future, in essence, are the ones that are affected. Edited by Glazier#1 (01 Sep 2022 10.44am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 01 Sep 22 11.04am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 01 Sep 22 11.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Oh, I see. Cheers. I don't have a choice, me. Can't sleep at night, thinking about my job. Rubber hammer needed. Or liquid cosh. lol.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 01 Sep 22 11.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Money not my God either, I can assure you, Cryrst. I work as a lecturer in an FE college and have had to watch as more and more staff get trimmed, pushing the workload onto the remaining staff. The level of stress in the job is immense as we are teaching the students who didn't make it to uni, are more kinaesthetically minded. In my subject, English, there are those who just don't want to do it and many will refuse, try to be disruptive and even violent in the process: all part of the job. Control in the classroom is a challenge, I can assure you again. As a lecturer, I trained in order to be able to teach: it's a highly - specialised profession yet many lecturers are now employed on a 'sessional' basis ie zero-hours contracts so they're only paid for their time in front of students. All the other, vital, work like prep, marking etc is not paid. That's being employed, essentially, on a casual basis, without the benefits of salaried staff. Now, there are those who say (maybe you are one of them) 'well, you don't go into teaching for the money' and that is true-to a certain extent. I'm afraid, though, that we've reached the point where it seems that the piss is being taken. We carry out an very valuable role in teaching young adults as they prepare for the world of work. The College says they cannot give us more money because 'We are a business and would go into debt'. A business. Yet their funding comes, to a great extent, from the state and that funding has got less and less in real terms over the years and that means the colleges themselves are between a rock and a hard place. Meanwhile, many of the students I teach have parents who do, indeed, go out and seek other jobs. Some have two or three but are still unable to cope financially; I really feel for them, working their butts off like honest citizens but finding themselves in the state they're in. Yet, for all that, I don't despise other workers for taking industrial action. Wages in this country are being driven down further and further and I don't think that's fair. It's not like the workforce over the last 10 years has been militant; far from it. I think they've been very patient. Most worrying is that, before long, young people who are the future of teaching will be saying: "Nah, what's the point of doing that as a profession? I'll find another job to look for", as you suggest, and the young students of this country, the country's future, in essence, are the ones that are affected. Edited by Glazier#1 (01 Sep 2022 10.44am) Firstly thanks for the response. What’s FE?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 01 Sep 22 11.33am | |
---|---|
Further education
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 01 Sep 22 11.51am | |
---|---|
I understand - but never agree with - strikes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 01 Sep 22 12.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Firstly thanks for the response. What’s FE? Those that are at FE are there actually studying trades like bricklaying, chippies, sparks, hairdressing catering you name, in order to get trade quals. While they're doing that, they are required to study English and Maths to a certain standard. (Employers have asked for this) so these numeracy and literacy classes run alongside their main courses. Many do go on to apprenticeships from college, as it happens. They're not the same as the traditional ones that we might know - full three year ones and some might argue that some employers treat them as cheap labour but, whatever, they are there. Edited by Glazier#1 (01 Sep 2022 12.32pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 01 Sep 22 12.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
I understand - but never agree with - strikes. The trouble is that companies continually want to drive wages down further and further. Concerning the highlighted bit, Dolph, P&O Ferries just sacked their staff (by video, without any warning) in total and took on 'agency' staff, all working below the minimum working wage and were simply allowed to do so. It was found not to be illegal and they get away with it. What a message to send to other companies. That kind of practice ought to be against labour law, surely? P&O today, you and me tomorrow. If this is 'getting real' well, I just don't know. I would say that it better to protect hard working people rather than just simply be jealous of public sector staff and support a 'race to the bottom' for all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 01 Sep 22 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Oh, I see. Cheers. I don't have a choice, me. Can't sleep at night, thinking about my job. Rubber hammer needed. Or liquid cosh. lol. When I first started work my new colleague didn't like my attitude (I worked hard) she tried to being me down to her lazy level constantly criticising me and the management. I ignored her and eventually they got rid. In theory I am all in favour of a work life balance but I suspect this trend will just attract people who are lazy. Of course you should not be answering emails on the beach but if you are not prepared to show some get up and go others will, if not in this country then elsewhere. Already we have unions promoting WFH and yet they don't seem to understand that if you can do the job 30 miles from work then someone else can do it 3000 miles from work. Careful what you wish for as they say.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.