This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Dubai Eagle 27 Mar 23 12.25pm | |
---|---|
Probably the statement of the season - "Play pragmatic football within our budget" Originally posted by fish mitten
Moyes may not be the manager to bring a new style of football, but having failed twice with that idea, I wonder if SP and the board will view him as the manager that will get us playing pragmatic football within our budget. I too won't be too disappointed. No point going for a manager who wants to play expansive passing football and then not supporting him with the signings to do so.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Painter Croydon 27 Mar 23 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fish mitten
Moyes may not be the manager to bring a new style of football, but having failed twice with that idea, I wonder if SP and the board will view him as the manager that will get us playing pragmatic football within our budget. I too won't be too disappointed. No point going for a manager who wants to play expansive passing football and then not supporting him with the signings to do so. Moyes is hated by W Ham fans for being too negative, why would we want their castoffs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrRobbo Chaldon 27 Mar 23 1.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Valid points, nice ground s*** team. Until they sell the club to someone whose prepared to spend big I agree Spurs will bounce between 4-8th. On your other post that Moyes could be be our next manager again i think a good call and I would not be too upset about that. I think their fans feeling is that they do spend reasonably big, almost always in the top 4. They just throw money at bad.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rachid Rachid Rachid 28 Mar 23 9.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fish mitten
Moyes may not be the manager to bring a new style of football, but having failed twice with that idea, I wonder if SP and the board will view him as the manager that will get us playing pragmatic football within our budget. I too won't be too disappointed. No point going for a manager who wants to play expansive passing football and then not supporting him with the signings to do so. This is what I don't get. SP and Freedman clearly listen to the fans hence the failure to renew Roy's contract last time. But I thought trying to change to a possession based football in the Premier League and fanfaring a new academy to achieve it sounded like a surrender to relegation unless some serious money was thrown at the first team in the meantime. It's great when an academy player starts for the first team but I saw the fuss around it as a statement of dis-intent to be honest. The reality is that dropping out of the premier will be dire when it comes whatever the misty-eyed view about academies and young players. The most recent graduate regularly playing is Tyrick Mitchell and he's being widely criticized.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 29 Mar 23 7.07am | |
---|---|
I thought they didnt renew his contract because he had done the job that they employed him for & at his age they didnt feel he was going to be the man to take the club forward as (at that time) we had the oldest team in the league & about 10 players out of contract, so it was felt that a change of manager was required in line with new signings & it would be better if any new manager had a say in the new signings- Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
This is what I don't get. SP and Freedman clearly listen to the fans hence the failure to renew Roy's contract last time. But I thought trying to change to a possession based football in the Premier League and fanfaring a new academy to achieve it sounded like a surrender to relegation unless some serious money was thrown at the first team in the meantime. It's great when an academy player starts for the first team but I saw the fuss around it as a statement of dis-intent to be honest. The reality is that dropping out of the premier will be dire when it comes whatever the misty-eyed view about academies and young players. The most recent graduate regularly playing is Tyrick Mitchell and he's being widely criticized.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 29 Mar 23 9.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
I thought they didnt renew his contract because he had done the job that they employed him for & at his age they didnt feel he was going to be the man to take the club forward as (at that time) we had the oldest team in the league & about 10 players out of contract, so it was felt that a change of manager was required in line with new signings & it would be better if any new manager had a say in the new signings- Well, that went well didn't it?
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
fish mitten Chelmsford 29 Mar 23 9.52am | |
---|---|
Yes, Becky. Back to square 1 again. Panic button hit (possibly rightly or not). What happens over the summer and who we appoint as manager will be interesting. I wonder if there are issues at Board level and may be there will be changes there in the summer, hence the main reason for a short term appointment. Is it that or just panic as the (lack of) investors see their 'investment' about to crash in value. Originally posted by becky
Well, that went well didn't it? Edited by fish mitten (29 Mar 2023 9.52am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 29 Mar 23 11.17am | |
---|---|
You look at the list of current PL managers and only six have been in charge in the PL longer than Vieira was. Three of them are Pep, Arteta and Klopp. Two are Moyes and Rodgers. Frank is the only one currently working successfully at a club of a similar size to us. De Zerbi is winning plaudits but he inherited a stable team with existing quality and he's only been in the job six months. Will he still be as successful next season if Brighton lose a couple of their stars? Previous PL managers like Hassenhutl and Nuno had their moment in the sun. Chris Wilder was declared a tactical genius in his first season in the PL and was sacked in his second. Long-term stability is the goal, but who actually has that other than the 'big six'? I'm resigned to Roy coming in to try and drag us over the line, but I really hope we don't abandon aspirations to at least try and play some better football next season. Our last season under Roy was the only time in over 30 years where there were games where I could barely even bring myself to watch, even when we won. On paper Favre ticks a lot of boxes, but it sounds like he might demand more input on the transfers front, but hey, maybe that's not a bad thing?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ambrose7 Croydon 29 Mar 23 11.59am | |
---|---|
I think Palace fans have one of the simplest sets of expectations of any set of fans in the country, evidenced by how infrequently we vocally get on the players' backs compared to the West Ham, Man United, Newcastle, Aston Villa etc. of the world. 1) Put a visible shift in and be solid at the back - Jedinak, Gallagher, Riihilahti, Michael Hughes etc. go down in folklore for their work rate. 2) Have wingers that are willing to take a risk and get you off your seat - Bolasie, Zaha, Puncheon, Olise a year ago, Eze 2 years ago. 3) Don't roll over when you go behind - competitive in every game. Sick of us going 1-0 down and then waiting for full time. The top 10 have lost 64 games this season - it's embarrassing that not a single one was against us. That is all good football is for a club like us. No stupid errors, look like you give a toss, and have a bit of flair up top to keep the entertainment up. Every so often you are lucky enough to stumble on a player like Cabaye that is a class above and you enjoy while it lasts and maybe have a particularly good season. We are never going to the new Ajax. The team Pulis took over was, on paper, complete crap but they fulfilled that brief and worked bloody hard. PV's team didn't come close to fulfilling that brief over the past few months.
26th January 2010 - Enter Administration |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 29 Mar 23 12.33pm | |
---|---|
I was in Sainsbury's car park, minding my own business wondering if I might catch a glimpse of some of our management hopefuls, when suddenly Gwyneth Paltrow mowed me down on a pair of roller skates. Bruised and battered I was left to myself whilst she skated off in the direction of the Holmesdale Rd.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 29 Mar 23 12.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ambrose7
I think Palace fans have one of the simplest sets of expectations of any set of fans in the country, evidenced by how infrequently we vocally get on the players' backs compared to the West Ham, Man United, Newcastle, Aston Villa etc. of the world. 1) Put a visible shift in and be solid at the back - Jedinak, Gallagher, Riihilahti, Michael Hughes etc. go down in folklore for their work rate. 2) Have wingers that are willing to take a risk and get you off your seat - Bolasie, Zaha, Puncheon, Olise a year ago, Eze 2 years ago. 3) Don't roll over when you go behind - competitive in every game. Sick of us going 1-0 down and then waiting for full time. The top 10 have lost 64 games this season - it's embarrassing that not a single one was against us. That is all good football is for a club like us. No stupid errors, look like you give a toss, and have a bit of flair up top to keep the entertainment up. Every so often you are lucky enough to stumble on a player like Cabaye that is a class above and you enjoy while it lasts and maybe have a particularly good season. We are never going to the new Ajax. The team Pulis took over was, on paper, complete crap but they fulfilled that brief and worked bloody hard. PV's team didn't come close to fulfilling that brief over the past few months. I agree with a lot of this, and you are right to say that we aren't looking to be the new Ajax. Both us and the club always end up back here, having this discussion about whether to play pragmatically or positively, whether we can develop as a team (or even develop individual players into valuable assets) with the former approach, and whether we can stay up with the latter. That's before you even start talking about what the point is of playing awful football just to say in a league so that you can carry on playing awful football. As you suggest, it probably isn't strictly a case of picking one extreme approach or the other when looking for a new manager - whoever turns up will either have to adapt their ideas to suit our squad anyway, or fail whilst trying to impose an unsuitable idea (hello, Frank...). For me, if we can get our hands on a more mobile forward I think the periods of games/months/seasons where we get at opponents, up the tempo, and give people something to shout about would increase. Then, all that time we spend in shape, shuffling around as a unit deep in our own half would at least be interspersed with genuine, dangerous counterattacks, which in turn would force more opponents to drop off a bit, which would allow Olise, Eze etc to play a bit more. Unlike (for instance) fans of Spurs, West Ham, Newcastle etc I think Palace fans are content with a sensible balance between pragmatism and endeavour in something like a 60/40 ratio, and we probably don't need a ground-breaking, revolutionary tactical guru to achieve that, just one or two better players and a bit more effort. Better (and different) players up top would probably change our game more than any manager we appoint. Having said all that, even balancing the three basic requirements you list is probably not as easy as it seems, at least not for a sustained period in the Premier League. The Spanish have a phrase that translates to something like 'Football is a small blanket; you can keep your nose warm or your toes, but not both'. The price of a solid defence is a loss of flair up front, and the cost of a positive approach is a more open defence, and the Palace blanket has so often proved to be too small!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrRobbo Chaldon 29 Mar 23 12.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
You look at the list of current PL managers and only six have been in charge in the PL longer than Vieira was. Three of them are Pep, Arteta and Klopp. Two are Moyes and Rodgers. Frank is the only one currently working successfully at a club of a similar size to us. De Zerbi is winning plaudits but he inherited a stable team with existing quality and he's only been in the job six months. Will he still be as successful next season if Brighton lose a couple of their stars? Previous PL managers like Hassenhutl and Nuno had their moment in the sun. Chris Wilder was declared a tactical genius in his first season in the PL and was sacked in his second. Long-term stability is the goal, but who actually has that other than the 'big six'? I'm resigned to Roy coming in to try and drag us over the line, but I really hope we don't abandon aspirations to at least try and play some better football next season. Our last season under Roy was the only time in over 30 years where there were games where I could barely even bring myself to watch, even when we won. On paper Favre ticks a lot of boxes, but it sounds like he might demand more input on the transfers front, but hey, maybe that's not a bad thing? Very good point re stability. I suspect the answer is in the De Zerbi example. Have a vision, build the structure, build a team. That you can drop the right manager into and expect him to flourish. Vs flapping between offensive and defensive managers, who have a v different outlook on philosophy and players
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.