This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 14 Feb 21 12.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Used to jump from aeroplanes as well. I believe it was all part of his stint as the Milk Tray man.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 14 Feb 21 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The real battle....well that I view as important starts in the republican party. Biden and the Democrats will do more to harden attitudes within the right than anything else. Their base isn't going to let the cucks and moderates get anywhere near the leadership. I should imagine all those that voted for impeachment will face replacement challengers at the first opportunity. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2021 10.28am) Yup trump is funding what he hopes will be a cull in order to root out the disloyal. Whatever you think of him I would hope it uncontested that he was always a man who has to be surrounded by Yes Men. Not my idea of democracy and accountability but there you go. Trouble is the Republican party always pushes its law and order agenda. You will now have candidates arguing the need to be tough on crime the death sentence for poor people walking on the crack of the pavement etc. But then have to face the accusation of hypocrisy as they voted effectively for the retrospective endorsement of mob rule and murder. Obviously that isn't what they voted for. And trump's base won't make that connection and will vote for them because of the way they voted on impeachment. But where a race is tight swing voters may not swing their way...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nead1 14 Feb 21 12.29pm | |
---|---|
How do you come to the conclusion that "the case against Trump was beyond poor"?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 21 12.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
If the dems were of the belief that trump organised the entry to the capitol building why did their lawyers have to sound 'convincing'? Only to convince those who might still have been giving him the benefit of any doubt. Some will never be convinced (murder on 5th Avenue etc) whilst others were already certain. There's always some though in the middle and the case made would have convinced many of them.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 14 Feb 21 12.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nead1
How do you come to the conclusion that "the case against Trump was beyond poor"? Scarily reminiscent? LOL. It was a load of misguided freaks. Who broke through a police cordon that was beyond weak (and the why around that needs answering ASAP). As far as coups go it was perhaps the most rubbish one we have ever seen. No attempt to seize any other strategic targets, no organised military involvement, no attempts to take control of media. In short, farcical. But kudos for Hitler and Putin in one post. Admire the effort.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nead1 14 Feb 21 1.06pm | |
---|---|
Glad you liked the analogy! I wouldn't have described it as a "coup"; much more just Trump's contempt for democratic values and a complete inability to accept the reality of defeat.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 21 1.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Fair comment. Impeachment was meant to oust a President who was abusing his power not to go after someone who no longer has it. The Democrats says they want to heal the country and the first thing they do is pick a fight with a guy who 50m people voted for. Trump will be 78? at the next election I doubt he will be a serious candidate due to his age by all means pursue him in the courts if he has broken the law. Fight him the way you do all political opponents through debate and argument, show the country his policies are no good and that he is divisive, trying to prevent him running just makes him a martyr.
Whether an ex-President could be impeached had not been tested before. Congress has definitively ruled on that. They can and they were. This was done because it had to be done. Trump's behaviour could not simply be brushed aside and ignored for to do so would have established a terrible precedent. Getting it over quickly, because the result was always known, established the principle, allowed the facts to be aired and the videos to be on the record. No-one picked a fight with Trump. Trump picked a fight with the constitution, the law, with convention and with decency. That fight needed to be responded to and then pushed aside so that the bigger issues can be concentrated upon. That 7 Republican Senators voted this time to convict is very significant. McConnell's speech yesterday likewise. If you haven't listened to it I recommend you do so. My reading is that the GOP want to distance themselves from Trump but know they are hogtied to him. The Democrats are gleefully tying some of the knots. The next 4 years will be very difficult for Biden as the pandemic will take a huge economic toll on the USA and the people there seem to have even shorter memories on where political responsibility lies than even we do. The GOP could easily regain control of both the House and the Senate in 2 years and have a decent chance of the Presidency in 2024, but only if they run a candidate who is less divisive than Trump.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 21 1.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Do you realise how hypocritical your reply sounds? You have 2 of your biggest allies on here ( won’t be so childish as to call them a cult!) who allegedly have been everywhere, done everything and are never wrong. Maple has had so many jobs I am beginning to wonder if he is the world’s oldest man or HOLs very own Benjamin Button! Wissie is.... Wissie I speak only for myself but let me assure you that anything I have ever said here about my life and experiences is completely true. I am not a fantasist in any way. There are many places I haven't yet been or things I have yet to do and as I am running out of time probably won't be able to. There will be some I have done that I haven't mentioned as, hopefully, when I do mention them they are in the context of the topic.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 14 Feb 21 1.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Whether an ex-President could be impeached had not been tested before. Congress has definitively ruled on that. They can and they were. This was done because it had to be done. Trump's behaviour could not simply be brushed aside and ignored for to do so would have established a terrible precedent. Getting it over quickly, because the result was always known, established the principle, allowed the facts to be aired and the videos to be on the record. No-one picked a fight with Trump. Trump picked a fight with the constitution, the law, with convention and with decency. That fight needed to be responded to and then pushed aside so that the bigger issues can be concentrated upon. That 7 Republican Senators voted this time to convict is very significant. McConnell's speech yesterday likewise. If you haven't listened to it I recommend you do so. My reading is that the GOP want to distance themselves from Trump but know they are hogtied to him. The Democrats are gleefully tying some of the knots. The next 4 years will be very difficult for Biden as the pandemic will take a huge economic toll on the USA and the people there seem to have even shorter memories on where political responsibility lies than even we do. The GOP could easily regain control of both the House and the Senate in 2 years and have a decent chance of the Presidency in 2024, but only if they run a candidate who is less divisive than Trump. Not sure you're right there. Many of the populist trump base will not tolerate what they see as a reversion to establishment. If anything it may encourage a very wealthy trumpish independent who will split the right and give the dems 4 more years. More likely a trump lite character who pays lip service to his politics but is a little more polished and statesmanlike. But they will be almost as divisive.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Feb 21 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Whether an ex-President could be impeached had not been tested before. Congress has definitively ruled on that. They can and they were. This was done because it had to be done. Trump's behaviour could not simply be brushed aside and ignored for to do so would have established a terrible precedent. Getting it over quickly, because the result was always known, established the principle, allowed the facts to be aired and the videos to be on the record. No-one picked a fight with Trump. Trump picked a fight with the constitution, the law, with convention and with decency. That fight needed to be responded to and then pushed aside so that the bigger issues can be concentrated upon. That 7 Republican Senators voted this time to convict is very significant. McConnell's speech yesterday likewise. If you haven't listened to it I recommend you do so. My reading is that the GOP want to distance themselves from Trump but know they are hogtied to him. The Democrats are gleefully tying some of the knots. The next 4 years will be very difficult for Biden as the pandemic will take a huge economic toll on the USA and the people there seem to have even shorter memories on where political responsibility lies than even we do. The GOP could easily regain control of both the House and the Senate in 2 years and have a decent chance of the Presidency in 2024, but only if they run a candidate who is less divisive than Trump. Interpreting the law is a decision for the Supreme Court if the legislature wants it to mean that then they should have passed legislation to that affect or asked the SC to pass judgment.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Feb 21 1.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nead1
How do you come to the conclusion that "the case against Trump was beyond poor"? The number of times I hear this crap from the left is absurd. The one person who was deliberately killed on that day was a women in the building not doing anything aggressive to anyone. The last people who broke into the Capitol building were the Black Panthers in the sixties....they were fully armed and yet it was ended peacefully with no deaths. Was that a reminder of the Nazis? How about the far leftist group who bombed the Capitol building in the seventies? Was that a reminder of the Nazis? When a right winger has bacon and eggs for breakfast. Is that a reminder of the Nazis? It's such an absurd comparison....do you have any idea how pro Jewish Trump and the GOP are? As for the waffle over Trump and Russia....the Democrats spent tens of millions investigating it and wasted years of important government business and arrived up with nothing. What about Biden and China and Ukraine? There are significantly dodgy connections with both not just with Biden but his family...... yet neither the media are interested nor are the Democrats. That's how fake they are both in principles and in practice. You you carry on moaning about Trump. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2021 2.09pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 21 2.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Not sure you're right there. Many of the populist trump base will not tolerate what they see as a reversion to establishment. If anything it may encourage a very wealthy trumpish independent who will split the right and give the dems 4 more years. More likely a trump lite character who pays lip service to his politics but is a little more polished and statesmanlike. But they will be almost as divisive. I agree that you are likely to be correct. Ted Cruz looks the most probable one. I also agree on the outcome, although the Democrats could by then be so unpopular that a non-Trumpian candidate might be able to succeed. Any GOP candidate who hammered Trump's behaviour but espoused the politics close to the hearts of traditional Republicans would stand a good chance in my book.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.