This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
cryrst The garden of England 08 Nov 19 3.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
No surprise to see pointless graphs from 1800 here. As if there could possibly be any comparison it is over 200 years ago. Still you were probably there come to think of it. Check from 1960 then
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 08 Nov 19 3.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Best we forget slavery then as that was 200 years ago. Indeed, in fact what you are seeing is the power of the patriarchy
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 08 Nov 19 4.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Capitalism, like all human systems, has flaws however this has been its overall affect. Sometimes I think it is good to remind people that it is not all bad as these graphs show. You can argue how accurate they are but the trend is pretty clear. In my lifetime the Berlin wall fell releasing Eastern Europe and Spain, Portugal and Greece got rid of their dictatorships. Across many parts of the world this has also happened. Of course it is not all good news and one child that dies of starvation is one too many. There are obvious areas of the world that have either stagnated or gone backward but overall I think the world is better today that 100 or even 50 years ago.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 08 Nov 19 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Sometimes I think it is good to remind people that it is not all bad as these graphs show. You can argue how accurate they are but the trend is pretty clear. In my lifetime the Berlin wall fell releasing Eastern Europe and Spain, Portugal and Greece got rid of their dictatorships. Across many parts of the world this has also happened. Of course it is not all good news and one child that dies of starvation is one too many. There are obvious areas of the world that have either stagnated or gone backward but overall I think the world is better today that 100 or even 50 years ago.
But the concern here is that the left are currently doing a great job of destroying this progress and huge wealth creation by advocating disastrous socialist policies whether is be "climate emergencys" diverting all our resources, flooding the west with immigrants or generally destroying the social fabric of western countries.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 08 Nov 19 5.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
This is what capitalism has done: The doesn't even factor in other improvements like medicine/vaccination. I don't think enough people understand this. If the west falls or gets taken over by socialism then the trends on this graph will reverse dramatically. We should be focused on removing chronyism not capitalism. I just wish more people would understand this. Interesting statement. Ant ideas on how to do this?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 08 Nov 19 6.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
Interesting statement. Ant ideas on how to do this? Transparency in all funding, not allowing monopolies to develope, encouraging the strict rule of law (accountability), banning of funded lobbying. e.g. people should have gone to jail for the financial crisis and corporations and institutions should be criminally accountable at senior / board level. Chronyism is also rampant outside of commerce. Notice how many talking heads appear on Sky from some foundation, think tank or research institute. All of these are getting funding from somewhere, often the government to push a political agenda.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 08 Nov 19 6.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
Transparency in all funding, not allowing monopolies to develope, encouraging the strict rule of law (accountability), banning of funded lobbying. Agreed. I would imagine you are pro competition in the market place right? So, are you in favour of banning Intellectual Property rights? That's a pretty big monopolistic tool. Banning of funded lobbying sounds good. Would you go so far as to say that corporations should not make political party contributions too, as they don't actually vote? e.g. people should have gone to jail for the financial crisis and corporations and institutions should be criminally accountable at senior / board level. Why? What did they do that was actually illegal? Chronyism is also rampant outside of commerce. Notice how many talking heads appear on Sky from some foundation, think tank or research institute. All of these are getting funding from somewhere, often the government to push a political agenda. Also from Multi millionaire/billionaires with their own political leanings. How on earth are you going to stop that, apart from not having these stupid rich donors in the first place. Don't get me wrong, great sentiments, but unlikely to happen anytime soon.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 08 Nov 19 6.36pm | |
---|---|
Tactical voting, good or bad. The Lib Dems, the Greens and Plaid whatever have announced they will not stand against each other. How very democratic of them. What have they said to their voters? "are you okay with not being able to vote for the party of your choice but will vote for another that doesn't represent your views beyond stop Johnson." I would say the same thing about a Tory Brexit pact but they haven't announced one yet. It just seems odd to me that parties bang on about democracy and then deny the voters the opportunity to have their say. As a poll clerk I once had an irate woman complain that the Greens weren't on the voting slip and she blamed me and the government in that order. I had to politely explain that the Greens hadn't fielded a candidate so she should that that up with them. The SNP are talking about a pact after the election so if you vote for them at least you know what you are getting. Not sure I am a fan of tactical voting when one or more parties stand down.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 08 Nov 19 6.41pm | |
---|---|
Neither. It just is. If I voted Brexit, but my area is tightly contested between Labour and Conservative, I will tactically vote Cons. What's the difference?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 08 Nov 19 7.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Sometimes I think it is good to remind people that it is not all bad as these graphs show. You can argue how accurate they are but the trend is pretty clear. In my lifetime the Berlin wall fell releasing Eastern Europe and Spain, Portugal and Greece got rid of their dictatorships. Across many parts of the world this has also happened. Of course it is not all good news and one child that dies of starvation is one too many. There are obvious areas of the world that have either stagnated or gone backward but overall I think the world is better today that 100 or even 50 years ago.
Yep, there are definitely areas of the world that have gone backwards, mainly due to the advance of backward interpretations of religions and of course wars. Organizations like the UN, which are mainly funded by capitalism have had a dramatic affect on world poverty and the rest of it since mass production and technological advances kicked in. We can always think more can be done, however plenty have died trying to help the vulnerable in dangerous countries. Attachment: women.JPG (99.26Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 08 Nov 19 7.32pm | |
---|---|
How can anyone take politics seriously? We have the SNP saying that Corbyn is dangerous but they will do a deal with Labour. They want out of Britain but wat to remain in the EU. They promise another independence vote when we just had one that was supposedly for a lifetime. Comedy gold. We have politicians telling us that populism is bad because it is the majority of people actually want and that the first referendum was void but they will trust us in another one and accept the result this time. All this because they only care about their careers and precious party politics. The message is clear. The electorate are just an annoying obstacle to their ambitions. I'll vote Tory because the opposition are a disgrace and I want Brexit. There is little else to say.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 08 Nov 19 9.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Tactical voting, good or bad. The Lib Dems, the Greens and Plaid whatever have announced they will not stand against each other. How very democratic of them. What have they said to their voters? "are you okay with not being able to vote for the party of your choice but will vote for another that doesn't represent your views beyond stop Johnson." I would say the same thing about a Tory Brexit pact but they haven't announced one yet. It just seems odd to me that parties bang on about democracy and then deny the voters the opportunity to have their say. As a poll clerk I once had an irate woman complain that the Greens weren't on the voting slip and she blamed me and the government in that order. I had to politely explain that the Greens hadn't fielded a candidate so she should that that up with them. The SNP are talking about a pact after the election so if you vote for them at least you know what you are getting. Not sure I am a fan of tactical voting when one or more parties stand down.
I see your point. I have a "choice" of green labour or Tory. I probably wouldn't have voted any of them. That said this may well be an election focussed wholly on one question. thus and as a unique one-off the pact makes sense.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.