This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Is Trump going to make president?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
.TUX.  13 Feb 17 5.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nairb75
trump: "hold my beer."
Buy Litecoin. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
  Hrolf The Ganger 13 Feb 17 6.26pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
That to which a rational hypothesis can be assigned, typically by disproving the null hypothesis. That to which evidence supports a valid or reliable conclusion. Even if the facts have an unfortunate 'liberal bias'. The rejection of 'alt-facts and alt-truth'. As long as the null hypothesis is genuinely disproved and not just replaced with another. I'm not a big believer in facts. Not the sort that can't be proven with maths anyway.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
nairb75  Baltimore 14 Feb 17 4.33am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 14 Feb 17 7.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nairb75
Much of the opposition don't appear to be any better from where i'm sitting tbh.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 14 Feb 17 1.00pm | |
|---|---|
|
Anti Trump campaign sets the bar at a new level....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | nairb75 Baltimore 14 Feb 17 1.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Much of the opposition don't appear to be any better from where i'm sitting tbh. my bar, at this point, is "will they start a completely unnecessary war?" republicans usually find a reason. democrats do all kinds of stupid stuff but usually try to not do that.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Feb 17 1.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
As long as the null hypothesis is genuinely disproved and not just replaced with another. I'm not a big believer in facts. Not the sort that can't be proven with maths anyway. I tend towards something that can be demonstrated with reasoned argument that's been peer reviewed or otherwise contested, over supposition, or subjective opinion and backed up by evidence, such as photographic record etc. Where as the US president, genuinely seems to only be interested in his opinion and beliefs, irrespective of reality, and seems to be quoting news from disreputatable sources, and disproven stories as fact.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 14 Feb 17 1.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Someone's in for a good-hiding but will it be abroad, or due to the massive 'militarisation' of the Police Depts in recent years, at home?
This. "Department of Homeland Security" has a wonderfully totalitarian resonance, doesn't it?
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Feb 17 1.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
As long as the null hypothesis is genuinely disproved and not just replaced with another. I'm not a big believer in facts. Not the sort that can't be proven with maths anyway. The position of the null hypothesis is typically the rejection of other explanation's being more plausible. The point of experimental models is to isolate significant variables and identify qualities that contribute in a highly significant and thus probable manner, to establish as 'most probable' explanation. Typically, by establishing a pattern of statistical relevance of .95 or higher, or a correlation factor of above 7 (on say the Pearson correlation co-efficient). That is of course when you cannot so a direct causal relationship (such as seen in laboratory models in Chemistry or Physics).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 14 Feb 17 2.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nairb75
my bar, at this point, is "will they start a completely unnecessary war?" republicans usually find a reason. democrats do all kinds of stupid stuff but usually try to not do that. Tbf, you've hardly been out of one since 1990 so it'd just be 'business as usual' i guess.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nairb75 Baltimore 15 Feb 17 3.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Tbf, you've hardly been out of one since 1990 so it'd just be 'business as usual' i guess. well that is the point. starting one is the main point. and now we have our president corroborating with russians. want to start a war with iran. dems are dumb but they aren't smart enough to be diabolical.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 15 Feb 17 6.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nairb75
well that is the point. starting one is the main point. and now we have our president corroborating with russians. Keep your friends close but your enemies closer? want to start a war with iran. Tbf, starting wars is second nature to the US so no change there. dems are dumb but they aren't smart enough to be diabolical. Hmmm............. Edited by .TUX. (15 Feb 2017 6.30am)
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.