See the post preceding yours, which makes it clearly untrue. This is what my new friend the ai chatbot has to say on the subject:-

"There were several criticisms and controversies surrounding the decision-making process and actions of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair regarding the Iraq War. Here are some key points:

Intelligence and WMD claims: One major controversy was the assertion that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), which was one of the main justifications for the war. The intelligence used to support these claims was later found to be flawed, leading to questions about the accuracy and presentation of the information by the Blair government.

Legal justifications: There were debates about the legality of the Iraq War under international law. The United Nations Security Council did not pass a resolution explicitly authorizing the use of force, leading some legal experts and critics to argue that the war was illegal.

Lack of post-war planning: Another criticism leveled against Blair's government was the inadequate planning for the post-war period, which contributed to the instability and sectarian violence that followed the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime.

Public and political support: The decision to go to war in Iraq was highly controversial and faced significant opposition from the public and within Blair's own Labour Party. The lack of a robust public debate and the perception that Blair was too closely aligned with the United States on the issue also drew criticism.

The Chilcot Inquiry: In 2009, the UK government established the Chilcot Inquiry to examine the UK's involvement in the Iraq War. The inquiry's final report, published in 2016, criticized the government's decision-making process, stating that Blair had overstated the threat posed by Iraq and had not exhausted all peaceful alternatives before resorting to military action.

While these points represent some of the criticisms and controversies surrounding Tony Blair's actions and decisions related to the Iraq War, it is important to note that perspectives on this issue can vary widely, and there are differing opinions on the extent of any misdeeds or wrongdoings."

It's very simple, Corbyn had two chances to win and failed both times.

IN 2017, Corybn bought in 40% of the vote in a general election. He was far from unelectable.

What made him unelectable was the ludicrous second referendum policy Labour adopted after 2017. Championed by Starmer. Who then replaced him, based on telling lie after lie to members of his own party. And then, expells Corybn.

Corybn scared a lot of people based on that 2017 result. Hence why he had to be bought down.

I see Corbyn as a political enemy. But I also can see when the game is being rigged. And with him, it was a full-on fix.

'I'm amused by the large number of parallels between Trump supporters and Tory supporters.

In particular, they are all passionate Law and Order
advocates, except, of course, when those principles apply to themselves.

Plus, they have deep emotional attachments to
pathological liars'.