This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 04 Oct 15 6.14pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 04 Oct 15 6.19pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
Second, your are a century out or so but the EIC ruled indirectly but 10s if not 100s of millions of deaths can be contributed to the EIC.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Oct 15 6.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "Christian extremists" I invite you to show me Christian extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 04 Oct 15 6.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question Couldn't agree more - that's why we should leave the EU as soon as possible.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 04 Oct 15 6.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Oct 15 6.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote pefwin at 04 Oct 2015 5.09pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 11.09am
Quote pefwin at 03 Oct 2015 8.01pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
It's in their DNA.
Personally, I don't think you meant to be racist against Asians. Did you?
I like the response from redblueyellow :- I'm a tolerant sort of bloke, I still think there's a way to make multi-culturalism work in Britain. That pretty much sums up my feelings about Islam too. DNA is about race and ethnicity, yet your excuse is about religion. You seem to want conflate the two, I don't trust people like that it smacks of 1940s.
I make no excuses for my opinions or beliefs and as you are merely a fictitious name on a football forum your trust is of no concern to me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Oct 15 6.40pm | |
---|---|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 04 Oct 15 6.42pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.40pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Oct 15 6.48pm | |
---|---|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.42pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.40pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I was discussing the matter with Pefwin - so butt out. I'm not interested in your views.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Oct 15 6.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Oct 15 6.56pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.51pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eustace H. Plimsoll Aldershot 04 Oct 15 6.59pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
Rightie-wrongies will believe the story for its self-evident truth yet strangely en masse gang-rape and murder poor defenceless widowed pensioners. The c***s. Double standards? (No.) Ongoing tedious indignant carping at presumed behaviour? (Ooh... ) Edited by Eustace H. Plimsoll (04 Oct 2015 7.02pm)
As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.