This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
imbored UK 18 Feb 15 8.23pm | |
---|---|
Colorado is making so much money from cannabis it's having to give some back to citizens Quote
Colorado's marijuana experiment has been an empirically rousing success thus far, with crime down and tourism up, and now the state has collected so much money in tax from sales of pot that it might be legally obliged to give some back. The state constitution puts a cap on the amount of tax money that can be taken in before some has to be returned, meaning Coloradans could see a share of the $50 million generated by sales of recreational cannabis. It's such an uncommon situation that both Democrats and Republicans are in agreement on it - both insist that there is no point in returning the money to taxpayers, not something you usually hear the GOP saying. - [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 18 Feb 15 8.29pm | |
---|---|
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy. 'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something. We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic.. If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.
''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.'' 'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate. You're not the only one who's 'bored'.
Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 18 Feb 15 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy. 'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something. We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic.. If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.
''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.'' 'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate. You're not the only one who's 'bored'.
Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm) I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 18 Feb 15 9.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.38pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy. 'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something. We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic.. If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.
''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.'' 'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate. You're not the only one who's 'bored'.
Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm) I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience. No. You said that 'reborn' was implying something when he clearly wasn't.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 18 Feb 15 9.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 9.00pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.38pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm
Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy. 'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something. We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic.. If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.
''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.'' 'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate. You're not the only one who's 'bored'.
Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm) I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience. No. You said that 'reborn' was implying something when he clearly wasn't. I took the view that: "Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." logically leads to if the poster believes this is true of the majority of people on Psych wards with mental health issues. I said 'if'. He's the ideal person to answer not you. And it's simply a question, not something to anger yourself over. Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 9.22pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Feb 15 7.23am | |
---|---|
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis. The majority of them probably drank as well. Most cases of mental health correlate with substance abuse, typically quite consistent substance abuse - Probably as a form of self medication. It doesn't seem to cause psychosis, the level of psychosis in society is far to low for it to be a major contributory factor (plus psychiatry doesn't generally regard psychosis as operating like that), psychosis like schizophrenia involves excessive dopamine levels, and cannabis doesn't seem to bind to, or affect dopamine production. However, what it may do, is trigger a psychosis in people predisposed towards psychosis, and my guess would be that this is through occasional bad reactions such as the 'whities or fear', which can produce a panic response, which involves paranoia and fear - which do have an affect on dopamine. In most people, these experiences aren't too significant, however if you were predisposed towards psychosis there is sufficient similarlity to present a case that, similar to PTSD (which has a genetic association) that the affect of the experience creates a recurrent problem (ie that the initial environmental stimulus, in certain people, will activate the predisposition). This would also explain why its a phenomena associated with notably strong strains of weed, rather than weed in general. Edited by jamiemartin721 (19 Feb 2015 7.36am)
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Feb 15 7.54am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
I just think your analysis here is wrong. I known plenty of people who buy bootleg fags....It's the same principle. Bootleg booze as well, if they can get hold of it at a cheaper price. Bootleg booze and fags are in the whole produced from legal sources, they're effectively purchased legally, and smuggled to evade tax. The level of violence and crime involved in the bootleg cigs and booze is hardly comparable to the illict drug trade. The criminal element is essentially low key, non-corruptive and not involved in controlling the market through violence. Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
They legalised marijuana in Colorado....Hasn't worked. Which is why the key factor is production under licence, through established businesses not by just 'legalising the existing sources'. Its important to note that the states approach is flawed in that it doesn't or hasn't approached the issue of where the drug comes from. Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
There are plenty of arguments against any kind of legalization....The tacit approval the state would then be giving to drugs use... Which is irrelivent - The state tacitly approves the consumption of alcohol and tabbacco. Plus the state may disapprove, society itself generally seems quite happy to provide tacit approval. Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
The increase in drug taking leading to more medical intervention.....I'm not sure I want the state getting involved in rubber stamping more negative life choices over the options we already have. Possibly, but it will also free up an enormous amount of law enforcement spending. Studies suggest that short term, the use will rise, long term its stabalises to around similar levels seen in current use. The reality is that these drugs are pretty freely available anyhow. Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
For me hallucinogenic drugs usage for pleasure is attached to failure and I don't want my young son growing up in a society that shrugs its shoulders about it. Maybe, but what you want your kid doing, and what they'll do are two entirely separate facts, and a society 'that shrugs' isn't the only choice. We have a society that approaches legal smoking with a rather different approach, and it would be wrong for any society to move to a 'hey lets all get high', what legalisation needs to do is target a health problem as a health problem, not a criminal justice one. Most of the people I know who are or were drug users are just ordinary members of society, from all walks of life, I don't really think its a sign of failure at all. Its a long time since drug use was synonymous with fringe cultures that reject society - Esctasy pretty much changed that. I'm fairly certain that you don't want your son getting a criminal record, just because he smoked some weed with his mates, one time, and was unlucky. Or have him drinking himself into a state on a Friday night. Doesn't mean he won't, because you and the law state otherwise. In fact quite the opposite. Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
Anyway I could live with legalization though I don't agree that it is the best overall way to proceed....If the problems with it could be overcome and genuinely led to an improvement I could see that opinion changing. I think the criminal justice approach failed, and was doomed to fail, creating far more problems for users, addicts and society in general than it ever resolved. Most notably, problems for people who don't take drugs.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
reborn 19 Feb 15 9.59am | |
---|---|
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.
My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyb1 Chichester 19 Feb 15 11.02am | |
---|---|
I will take the mental illness aspect from a personal experience of someone I knew, I don't know all the facts but the best I knew was that in her younger years she suffered I believe sexual abuse by a family member, she had always been quite loud and bubbly as a teenager whilst I was around 11/12. I used to drink but am teetotal to a degree as prior to christmas day where I had 1 pint with the father in law (which got me quite smashed) I hadn't had one for around 3yrs. So old Jon Snow Whitey can stick his "it's much worse then a war zone" bollocks, as many people have said if you stuck him in a better environment to carry this out you would have got a different result but this is not what channel 4 want oh no as channel 4 look to be some kind of political propaganda tool as there is an election a foot and the waning public feeling on cannabis prohibition on public polls had started to take quite a rise in favour of legalization. If they wanted to make this experiment fair they should also have a regular smoker do the same as I cannot see what would be much different in comparison of brain scans. So enough of this morals s*** as we as a society don't have them We know alcohol causes multiple damages to the individual and sometimes those around but we don't stop selling it, just tell people to "drink responsibly" as it's deemed a health issue, well why can't we do the same with cannabis. We know tobacco does the same as the above. We know bankers caused the majority of the world to go into financial meltdown but we still let them trade and give them more money to bail them out. We knew the very people in the heart of our government were molesting young children at the time, but prevented anything being done to stop it. Those with there snouts in the trough benefit from those wealthy enough to see cannabis legalization as a threat and will pay anything to keep it that way, GW pharmaceuticals would not want any old MS sufferer growing there medicine when they sell it at god knows the mark up on there cannabis spray sativex.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 19 Feb 15 3.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote reborn at 19 Feb 2015 9.59am
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.
Thanks very much for your reply reborn
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Feb 15 6.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote reborn at 19 Feb 2015 9.59am
Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm
Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm
Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane. Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.
As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.
definately a correlation but its not the thc. Even this report suggests that its not the thc, but the intense strength strains. I wouldn't say cannabis is harmless or without risks either given that its generally smoked, with tabbacco etc. The issue isn't whether its harmful, it whether or not the legal prohibition is more harmful than the drug itself and whether those laws serve the best interests of society, including the drug users.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyb1 Chichester 14 Apr 15 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Interesting and I never thought the DM would run this type of story (and will probably go back to cannabis bashing tomorrow)but it seems the cat is finally starting to come out the bag now. We know that it has many medical benefits, someone posted a link here to palaces very own centenary book where an extract from the advertiser was promoting a pharmacist prescribing cannabis for corns in penge. All we have left is only the stigma of reefer madness that people need to shrug off, cannabis medically will be accepted worldwide when more and more country's lift there scheduling ban and those men in white coats are free to explore more in depth the possibility's that are out there. And not only in medicine, hemp fibre for paper, fabric, textile and the oil for paint, fuel and much more.
This company would crumble if cannabis was made legal and are paying good money to keep it that way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.