This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
johnfirewall 01 Oct 14 8.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.58pm
Quote johnfirewall at 01 Oct 2014 10.36am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 9.57am
Quote Moose at 01 Oct 2014 9.22am
Quote Stuk at 30 Sep 2014 11.41pm
Quote johnfirewall at 30 Sep 2014 11.29pm
Gotta to a sweep at work in light of this news. I feel the net is closing in on my prime suspect. Pat Sharp? I reckon john's looking bigger than Pat. CT, anyone? I'm hoping for the entire breakfast through to 6.00pm of Capital Radio, including the c**ts who phoned in for competitions. Well I'm thinking same sort of calibre as CT. Noel Edmunds? Everything about him screams nonse. No comment.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 01 Oct 14 9.06pm | |
---|---|
So just so I understand the law here, if you're a Muslim in Rotherham you can molest and rape children for 15 years with impunity and no hassle from the old bill, but if you're a famous person who brushed against someone's breast or touched their bum 30 years ago (according to them) you get the full force of the law with your career and reputation in tatters? Nice to know the boys in blue have their priorities in the right order
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Oct 14 9.53pm | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 01 Oct 2014 9.06pm
So just so I understand the law here, if you're a Muslim in Rotherham you can molest and rape children for 15 years with impunity and no hassle from the old bill, but if you're a famous person who brushed against someone's breast or touched their bum 30 years ago (according to them) you get the full force of the law with your career and reputation in tatters? Nice to know the boys in blue have their priorities in the right order
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 01 Oct 14 10.36pm | |
---|---|
There's a program on CH4 right now about a vigilante exposing Paedophiles. Well done that man but it does beg the question why the Police aren't doing this? If it's DLT, Freddie Starr, etc who had a cheeky fumble years ago they come down like a ton of bricks. Beggars belief
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Oct 14 8.54am | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 6.53pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.55pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 11.10am
Tally Ho........ he will be hounded till found guilty. A brush with the law, if you will. You make it sound worse than it all is, as if everyone is being imprisoned who ever looked at a woman or child funny. Reality is DLT was found not guilty all but one charge, and got a suspended sentence, whilst Roache, Jim Davidson and that other actor were found not Guilty. Meanwhile Rolf Harris, Stewart Hall and Max Clifford were actually found guilty of remarkably serious sexual offences. And any system that can find Jim Davidson not guilty or dismiss charges against him, must by default be fair, because most of us would have him on the pyre for Big f**king Break. Gary Glitter is due up soon. How many people will be so dismissive of his charges?
My response was a series of fox puns.
Your Puns sir, I salute them. 07
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Oct 14 8.59am | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 01 Oct 2014 10.36pm
There's a program on CH4 right now about a vigilante exposing Paedophiles. Well done that man but it does beg the question why the Police aren't doing this? If it's DLT, Freddie Starr, etc who had a cheeky fumble years ago they come down like a ton of bricks. Beggars belief Because it would be entrapment. Its a very grey area, a lot of the vigilantes (and baiters) utilize communication patterns that aim to entice people into committing an offence. As such, when it got to court, a half decent brief will demonstrate that you were not intending to engage in criminality, but was tempted into it by the actions of the third party, which undermines either Mens Rae or Actus Rae requirements for a conviction. ie that you would never have done what you did, if you hadn't been 'led on' or otherwise encouraged to do so by the party looking to arrest you.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Oct 14 9.03am | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 01 Oct 2014 9.06pm
So just so I understand the law here, if you're a Muslim in Rotherham you can molest and rape children for 15 years with impunity and no hassle from the old bill, but if you're a famous person who brushed against someone's breast or touched their bum 30 years ago (according to them) you get the full force of the law with your career and reputation in tatters? Nice to know the boys in blue have their priorities in the right order Well its not actually a case of brushing against someones boob or bum is it. And lets be honest, whilst the Rotherham abuse in care homes is a horrific event, its not like we have a great history of Christians not getting away with abusing kids in care for decades. Its not a muslim or Christian, white or brown thing, its basically that the police, and society, really don't give two s**ts about people in care (whether they're kids, mentally ill, care in the community or the old), we basically shut them up, cut the funding and try to keep quiet about it, on an institutional level.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 02 Oct 14 9.05am | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 01 Oct 2014 10.36pm
There's a program on CH4 right now about a vigilante exposing Paedophiles. Well done that man but it does beg the question why the Police aren't doing this? If it's DLT, Freddie Starr, etc who had a cheeky fumble years ago they come down like a ton of bricks. Beggars belief
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 02 Oct 14 9.48am | |
---|---|
Quote glazedallover at 01 Oct 2014 7.10pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 6.53pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.55pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 11.10am
Tally Ho........ he will be hounded till found guilty. A brush with the law, if you will. You make it sound worse than it all is, as if everyone is being imprisoned who ever looked at a woman or child funny. Reality is DLT was found not guilty all but one charge, and got a suspended sentence, whilst Roache, Jim Davidson and that other actor were found not Guilty. Meanwhile Rolf Harris, Stewart Hall and Max Clifford were actually found guilty of remarkably serious sexual offences. And any system that can find Jim Davidson not guilty or dismiss charges against him, must by default be fair, because most of us would have him on the pyre for Big f**king Break. Gary Glitter is due up soon. How many people will be so dismissive of his charges?
My response was a series of fox puns.
Remember your advice to me hoof? If you are trying to be funny dont forget the smiley.....
I think Jamie was having an off day. Edited by Hoof Hearted (02 Oct 2014 9.51am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 02 Oct 14 10.02am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Oct 2014 8.54am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 6.53pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.55pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 11.10am
Tally Ho........ he will be hounded till found guilty. A brush with the law, if you will. You make it sound worse than it all is, as if everyone is being imprisoned who ever looked at a woman or child funny. Reality is DLT was found not guilty all but one charge, and got a suspended sentence, whilst Roache, Jim Davidson and that other actor were found not Guilty. Meanwhile Rolf Harris, Stewart Hall and Max Clifford were actually found guilty of remarkably serious sexual offences. And any system that can find Jim Davidson not guilty or dismiss charges against him, must by default be fair, because most of us would have him on the pyre for Big f**king Break. Gary Glitter is due up soon. How many people will be so dismissive of his charges?
My response was a series of fox puns.
Your Puns sir, I salute them. 07
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Moose In the sewer pipe... 02 Oct 14 10.06am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Oct 2014 8.54am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 6.53pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.55pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 11.10am
Tally Ho........ he will be hounded till found guilty. A brush with the law, if you will. You make it sound worse than it all is, as if everyone is being imprisoned who ever looked at a woman or child funny. Reality is DLT was found not guilty all but one charge, and got a suspended sentence, whilst Roache, Jim Davidson and that other actor were found not Guilty. Meanwhile Rolf Harris, Stewart Hall and Max Clifford were actually found guilty of remarkably serious sexual offences. And any system that can find Jim Davidson not guilty or dismiss charges against him, must by default be fair, because most of us would have him on the pyre for Big f**king Break. Gary Glitter is due up soon. How many people will be so dismissive of his charges?
My response was a series of fox puns.
Your Puns sir, I salute them. 07
Goodness is what you do. Not who you pray to. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 02 Oct 14 10.07am | |
---|---|
Quote Moose at 02 Oct 2014 10.06am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Oct 2014 8.54am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 6.53pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Oct 2014 3.55pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Oct 2014 11.10am
Tally Ho........ he will be hounded till found guilty. A brush with the law, if you will. You make it sound worse than it all is, as if everyone is being imprisoned who ever looked at a woman or child funny. Reality is DLT was found not guilty all but one charge, and got a suspended sentence, whilst Roache, Jim Davidson and that other actor were found not Guilty. Meanwhile Rolf Harris, Stewart Hall and Max Clifford were actually found guilty of remarkably serious sexual offences. And any system that can find Jim Davidson not guilty or dismiss charges against him, must by default be fair, because most of us would have him on the pyre for Big f**king Break. Gary Glitter is due up soon. How many people will be so dismissive of his charges?
My response was a series of fox puns.
Your Puns sir, I salute them. 07
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.