This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 13 Feb 21 7.02pm | |
---|---|
On the day the Capitol building was invaded by Trump supporters it was reported by media that a police officer had been killed by rioters using a fire extinguisher. That claim was repeated on here several times and certain posters referenced it several times during their take on those events. This claim has also been spread all around the world and used to demonise in leftist media. This death was even referred to by Democrats in Trump's impeachment trial. However, news is emerging that there is zero evidence for this officer having died this way. No one has been charged with his death, which indeed appears to have been by a stroke. He seems to have sent a text to his brother saying that he'd been pepper strayed but was in good shape, shortly before he collapsed. We await the medical report, which still hasn't been released.....but it appears highly unlikely that any blunt force trauma happened. Indeed, no Trump supporters appear to be responsible for any deaths that day, but this hasn't been how it's reported. The one person who was deliberately killed on that day seems to have been unnecessarily shot by law enforcement. What we had was a lie, circulated around the world by malicious liars and hastily believed and amplified by the uncritical.
Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Feb 2021 7.05pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 13 Feb 21 9.10pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 13 Feb 21 9.28pm | |
---|---|
I genuinely struggle to understand the logic of bringing this impeachment. It was clear it would not win and hands Trump a final victory. Twice they tried to do his legs and twice he walks away laughing. On the oldest rules in any kind of politics is to only pick fights, in 99.9% of circumstances, you can win. Why fight a battle you know you are going to lose? I appreciate that people are polarised over Trump but I would be genuinely interested to read any views from the Left that think this farce was a good idea and what it has achieved? All I see is it reinforcing that notion that the anti-Trump hysteria is just one huge statement of double standards of the most brazen kind given what we have seen and heard from huge swathes of the shrillest voices over the last 12 months specifically and in several cases, before. But I am all ears as to others view points. Edited by Matov (13 Feb 2021 9.29pm)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Feb 21 10.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I genuinely struggle to understand the logic of bringing this impeachment. It was clear it would not win and hands Trump a final victory. Twice they tried to do his legs and twice he walks away laughing. On the oldest rules in any kind of politics is to only pick fights, in 99.9% of circumstances, you can win. Why fight a battle you know you are going to lose? I appreciate that people are polarised over Trump but I would be genuinely interested to read any views from the Left that think this farce was a good idea and what it has achieved? All I see is it reinforcing that notion that the anti-Trump hysteria is just one huge statement of double standards of the most brazen kind given what we have seen and heard from huge swathes of the shrillest voices over the last 12 months specifically and in several cases, before. But I am all ears as to others view points. Edited by Matov (13 Feb 2021 9.29pm) It was done, as was the first one, because it had to be done. If the Democrats had failed to they would rightly have stood accused of political hypocrisy. It may well rebound on the Democrats but that's the price to be paid if you protect democracy and the constitution. Trump was clearly guilty on both occasions. Politics saved him the first time. The 2/3rds requirement the second. However, it has also exposed the hypocrisy of the majority of GOP Senators and how they fear the influence of Trump. Democrats, independents and non-Trumpian Republicans will have had their determination to never allow this man to ever hold power again re-inforced. If any of you watched the actual presentations and arguments that were presented then I challenge anyone to truly believe Trump wasn't guilty as charged. The prosecution case was very well presented and convincing. The defence was badly presented, confused and offered excuses and diversions rather than cogent arguments. In a Court of law he would undoubtedly have been found guilty. Which makes Trump's post-verdict announcement particularly offensive. Which was hardly surprising. At least Congress can now move on to getting Biden's appointments confirmed and Trump's future can be left to dealing with the various legal challenges that are in store for him.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 13 Feb 21 10.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
How has democracy and the constitution been protected by this impeachment failing? And not only just failing but doomed to fail before it even began? Trump wins. Again. It was a piece of ludicrous political theatre that served no practical purpose. Trump loses the election and then is given a chance in the primary US political arena to walk away victorious. And the Democrats knew that would happen. Now I love looking for the nuance and/or wheels within wheels but in this case? Just an act of moronic political stupidity with zero political upside for the Democrats.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Feb 21 10.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It was done, as was the first one, because it had to be done. If the Democrats had failed to they would rightly have stood accused of political hypocrisy. It may well rebound on the Democrats but that's the price to be paid if you protect democracy and the constitution. Trump was clearly guilty on both occasions. Politics saved him the first time. The 2/3rds requirement the second. However, it has also exposed the hypocrisy of the majority of GOP Senators and how they fear the influence of Trump. Democrats, independents and non-Trumpian Republicans will have had their determination to never allow this man to ever hold power again re-inforced. If any of you watched the actual presentations and arguments that were presented then I challenge anyone to truly believe Trump wasn't guilty as charged. The prosecution case was very well presented and convincing. The defence was badly presented, confused and offered excuses and diversions rather than cogent arguments. In a Court of law he would undoubtedly have been found guilty. Which makes Trump's post-verdict announcement particularly offensive. Which was hardly surprising. At least Congress can now move on to getting Biden's appointments confirmed and Trump's future can be left to dealing with the various legal challenges that are in store for him.
This was all about blocking democracy. The Democrats don't want the bother of having to fix another election when Trump runs in '24. They will have to open up the borders completely so enough Mexicans arrive to guarantee another Democrat victory.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Feb 21 10.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
How has democracy and the constitution been protected by this impeachment failing? And not only just failing but doomed to fail before it even began? Trump wins. Again. It was a piece of ludicrous political theatre that served no practical purpose. Trump loses the election and then is given a chance in the primary US political arena to walk away victorious. And the Democrats knew that would happen. Now I love looking for the nuance and/or wheels within wheels but in this case? Just an act of moronic political stupidity with zero political upside for the Democrats. The Democrats did indeed expect to happen. They might have even hoped it would happen. The only way the Republicans could have won was to have grown some and have found Trump guilty. That way they could have drawn the line and concentrated on opposing Biden. Now they will continue to have the spectre of Trump's behaviour haunting them. Democracy and the constitution win because they demand that Presidents who act unconstitutionally get impeached, whatever the political consequence. Trump wasn't the only one on trial. Congress was too and it lost because of the Republicans. That matters. The upside for the Democrats will be the hardening of attitudes against Trump by the independents and traditional Republicans. He needs them to stand any chance of winning again in 2024 making it even less likely that he would be given the nomination. So whilst his base will be firmed his platform gets smaller. He will continue to make noise and no-doubt provoke others to take the law into their own hands but he will also face many legal challenges, some of which could see him jailed. So there is a genuine reason to believe that this impeachment has contributed to ensuring Trump's demise is permanent.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Feb 21 10.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This was all about blocking democracy. The Republicans don't want the bother of having to fix another election when Trump runs in '24. They will have to open up the borders completely so enough Mexicans arrive to guarantee another Democrat victory. It's you who are deluded. There is no chance at all that the US electorate would ever vote Trump back in. There is a chance he would stand but that's different. Fix an election? Do you seriously believe that the last one was? If so you are confirming your delusion beyond any doubt at all.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Feb 21 10.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's you who are deluded. There is no chance at all that the US electorate would ever vote Trump back in. There is a chance he would stand but that's different. Fix an election? Do you seriously believe that the last one was? If so you are confirming your delusion beyond any doubt at all. I believe that anything is possible in today's bonkers world. What I know for sure is that this latest charade was to stop Trump running again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 13 Feb 21 10.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I believe that anything is possible in today's bonkers world. What I know for sure is that this latest charade was to stop Trump running again. Well, if Wissy is right maybe they want him to run again as that would automatically divide the Republican support.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 13 Feb 21 10.56pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 13 Feb 21 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Well, if Wissy is right maybe they want him to run again as that would automatically divide the Republican support. I had considered this too. Trump still has significant support within the Republican party and so for as long as he can run they are essentially tied to him. Only I don't think he has any genuine aspiration to be President again (or enough support), so he's more likely to be a spanner in the works, a thorn in the side. He may well run as a third party candidate next time around for the free publicly, without the inconvenience of actually having to be President. Ironically that's likely what he was striving for first time around.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.