This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
genericname London 07 Nov 13 9.44am | |
---|---|
You can get an adult season ticket in the Matthew Harding lower or the Shed lower for £750 (£380 for an OAP or child). So if you can manage to save £14.42 every week over the course of a year, you can afford to go to every single league game. People often spend more on cigarettes. Domestic cup games are very reasonably priced too. Champion's League is more expensive (not sure about the rest of the ground but I pay £36 for a group game and then I think it is about £55 for the knock-outs) but you're seeing the elite level of club football in the World. How much is a season ticket at Palace these days then? Edited by genericname (07 Nov 2013 9.56am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
goodersgold Hastings 07 Nov 13 5.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote chelski at 06 Nov 2013 10.08am
Oh dear. I hear this nonsense from the uneducated all the time. Ok lets take each point: Bought the title? - Name one club who has won anything with all home-grown players? How many of your players are bought? Its just that we spend more money than you that bothers you. oh well!!!!
No I don't care how much you spend and I hope we never get bought out by a sugar daddy with no affiliation to the club.
The world was a mess but his hair was perfect! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chelski london 08 Nov 13 12.33pm | |
---|---|
No I am not but lots of Chelsea fans are!! If you are going to have an opinion its always good to check your facts before you open your mouth and make yourself look stupid!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
goodersgold Hastings 08 Nov 13 5.49pm | |
---|---|
Quote chelski at 08 Nov 2013 12.33pm
No I am not but lots of Chelsea fans are!! If you are going to have an opinion its always good to check your facts before you open your mouth and make yourself look stupid!!
The world was a mess but his hair was perfect! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TomThePalaceFanatic 08 Nov 13 7.57pm | |
---|---|
Quote chelski at 08 Nov 2013 12.33pm
No I am not but lots of Chelsea fans are!! If you are going to have an opinion its always good to check your facts before you open your mouth and make yourself look stupid!! Just because 'everyone' buys the league, it doesn't mean it's right.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
genericname London 09 Nov 13 10.49am | |
---|---|
Chelsea did indeed record some crap crowds in the 1980's but football attendances all over England were down in this period for a number of reasons (see my earlier post about Palace AVERAGING around 6,000 for consecutive seasons in the mid-80's....although having said that, they amazingly shot up to around the 20,000 mark for the 90/91 season when Palace finished third in the top flight. Hmmmm....glory hunters anyone?) I don't really see your point with the money. You say you maintain that Chelsea bought the title...but then you go onto say that it is impossible to win it without large investment. So what is your point? You also say Chelsea 'sold out' but what does that even mean? The club were in a precarious financial position so agreed to a deal which was beneficial (and has proved to be very successful). What do you think they should have done? Resisted the offer and gone down the sh*t pan? Palace have agreed to take-overs in the past (as have many other club) to save themselves. Without the recent take-over and investment, the club would have gone out of existence. Why do you think those deals were fine but Chelsea were 'selling out'? Is it because Roman is foreign and happens to have more money? Of course it would be nice if new owners were always dyed-in-the-wool, local fans but surely that isn't everything? Look at that bloke who bought Palace - Mark Goldberg. Were you happy with his spell at the club? He fits your criteria for a good owner (a local fan) so you must have been delighted even though it was a disaster and the club slid towards liquidation. As for plastic fans, of course Chelsea have some. Every successful club attracts them.....but as far as I'm aware, this bloke (Chelski) has a season ticket and has been going for several years so I have no idea why you're calling him a plastic. And do you really think there are no fair-weather 'plastics' at Palace? Indeed, a couple of seasons ago, you recorded the colossal attendance of 3,140 for a league cup game with Torquay. Where were all your 'fanatics' that night? Was some spectacular form of entertainment taking place in Croydon that night which prevented them from attending the game? Not too 'fanatical' is it? And of course you've been averaging around the 15k mark for the past few seasons (which isn't bad for the Championship of course).....but when you win promotion to the Premier League, Selhurst is full to the brim. So it appears a large percentage of your 'die hards' are only attracted to the bright lights of the Premier League. Views? Edited by genericname (09 Nov 2013 12.39pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
goodersgold Hastings 09 Nov 13 11.37am | |
---|---|
Quote genericname at 09 Nov 2013 10.49am
Chelsea did indeed record some crap crowds in the 1980's but football attendances all over England were down in this period for a number of reasons (see my earlier post about Palace AVERAGING around 6,000 for consecutive seasons in the mid-80's....although having said that, they amazingly shot up to around the 20,000 mark for the 90/91 season when Palace finished third in the top flight. Hmmmm....glory hunters anyone?) I don't really see your point with the money. You say you maintain that Chelsea bought the title...but then you go onto say that it is impossible to win it without large investment. So what is your point? You also say Chelsea 'sold out' but what does that even mean? The club were in a precarious financial position so agreed to a deal which was beneficial (and has proved to be very successful). What do you think they should have done? Resisted the offer and gone down the sh*t pan? Palace have agreed to take-overs in the past (as have many other club) to save themselves. Without the recent take-over and investment, the club would have gone out of existence. Why do you think those deals were fine but Chelsea were 'selling out'? Is it because Roman is foreign and happens to have more money? Of course it would be nice if new owners were always died-in-the-wool, local fans but surely that isn't everything? Look at that bloke who bought Palace - Mark Goldberg. Were you happy with his spell at the club? He fits your criteria for a good owner (a local fan) so you must have been delighted even though it was a disaster and the club slid towards liquidation. As for plastic fans, of course Chelsea have some. Every successful club attracts them.....but as far as I'm aware, this bloke (Chelski) has a season ticket and has been going for several years so I have no idea why you're calling him a plastic. And do you really think there are no fair-weather 'plastics' at Palace? Indeed, a couple of seasons ago, you recorded the colossal attendance of 3,140 for a league cup game with Torquay. Where were all your 'fanatics' that night? Was some spectacular form of entertainment taking place in Croydon that night which prevented them from attending the game? Not too 'fanatical' is it? And of course you've been averaging around the 15k mark for the past few seasons (which isn't bad for the Championship of course).....but when you win promotion to the Premier League, Selhurst is full to the brim. So it appears a large percentage of your 'die hards' are only attracted to the bright lights of the Premier League. Views? Yes we have plastics I don't like it ,who only go because we are in the prem the difference being which you turds fail to grasp is no one supports us because we win every week. Edited by goodersgold (09 Nov 2013 11.53am)
The world was a mess but his hair was perfect! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
genericname London 09 Nov 13 12.59pm | |
---|---|
Quote goodersgold at 09 Nov 2013 11.37am
Yes we have plastics I don't like it ,who only go because we are in the prem the difference being which you turds fail to grasp is no one supports us because we win every week. Edited by goodersgold (09 Nov 2013 11.53am) No, Palace aren't winning trophies but being promoted to the Premier League is 'comparable' glory for the club....which is why 10,000 plastics crawl out of the woodwork each time you're promoted....and then disappear when you get relegated again. In my eyes they're just as bad as a Man United fan in Devon. At least those t***s are unashamed, blatant glory hunters. The plastics who suddenly re-find their 'love' of their local team when they reach the promised land of the Premier League do so under the guise that they're somehow more noble and genuine as the team is cack and not going to win anything. "We support our local team.....we support our local team!" Yes, when they're in the Premier League at least. I have seen the kind at Chelsea many times. One that sticks in my mind is when scunthorpe came to Chelsea in the FA Cup in around 2005 and brought 7,000....double their average home gate. All done up in jester's hats and face paint for their 'day out'. Then they had the cheek to sing "Where were you when you were sh*t?"...erm, more to the point, where were you last week when you were entertaining Exeter? "I'm scunthorpe till I die!" Surely you mean "scunthorpe till next week" when it's back to playing Grimsby? Fair play to the genuine scunthorpe fans who go all the time (like the true Palace fans) but I have no time for the others. In many ways, these kind of people are sort of 'supporting' the opposition. They don't want to see Palace play Torquay in the league cup but they'd bite your hands off for a Premier League Palace vs Arsenal/Chelsea/United etc. ticket. The opposition is clearly just as, if not more important to them. Regarding Chelsea without Roman, I have no doubts whatsoever we wouldn't have won the same without his financial injection. That said, we were far from sh*t prior to his arrival. We qualified for the Champion's League the season before his arrival and won 2 FA Cups, a League Cup, a European Cup Winner's Cup, a European Super Cup and a Charity Shield a few years previously. And we had players like Gullit, Vialli, Desailly, Zola, Hasselbaink etc. But sure, we wouldn't have won 3 titles and a European Cup.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Goal Machine The Cronx 09 Nov 13 8.42pm | |
---|---|
Strange that a Chelsea can should post on a Palace forum. Chelsea, along with Man City represent everything that is wrong with modern day football. Chelsea have become the most soulless club in England and have bought their success. The day an oil tycoon worth billions bought Palace is the day I'd lose interest. I'm quite happy as a Championship club with the occasional Premier League flirt thank you. Go back to The Bridge and sit in silence for 90 mins like you do every week.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
goodersgold Hastings 11 Nov 13 8.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote genericname at 09 Nov 2013 12.59pm
Quote goodersgold at 09 Nov 2013 11.37am
Yes we have plastics I don't like it ,who only go because we are in the prem the difference being which you turds fail to grasp is no one supports us because we win every week. Edited by goodersgold (09 Nov 2013 11.53am) No, Palace aren't winning trophies but being promoted to the Premier League is 'comparable' glory for the club....which is why 10,000 plastics crawl out of the woodwork each time you're promoted....and then disappear when you get relegated again. In my eyes they're just as bad as a Man United fan in Devon. At least those t***s are unashamed, blatant glory hunters. The plastics who suddenly re-find their 'love' of their local team when they reach the promised land of the Premier League do so under the guise that they're somehow more noble and genuine as the team is cack and not going to win anything. "We support our local team.....we support our local team!" Yes, when they're in the Premier League at least. I have seen the kind at Chelsea many times. One that sticks in my mind is when scunthorpe came to Chelsea in the FA Cup in around 2005 and brought 7,000....double their average home gate. All done up in jester's hats and face paint for their 'day out'. Then they had the cheek to sing "Where were you when you were sh*t?"...erm, more to the point, where were you last week when you were entertaining Exeter? "I'm scunthorpe till I die!" Surely you mean "scunthorpe till next week" when it's back to playing Grimsby? Fair play to the genuine scunthorpe fans who go all the time (like the true Palace fans) but I have no time for the others. In many ways, these kind of people are sort of 'supporting' the opposition. They don't want to see Palace play Torquay in the league cup but they'd bite your hands off for a Premier League Palace vs Arsenal/Chelsea/United etc. ticket. The opposition is clearly just as, if not more important to them. Regarding Chelsea without Roman, I have no doubts whatsoever we wouldn't have won the same without his financial injection. That said, we were far from sh*t prior to his arrival. We qualified for the Champion's League the season before his arrival and won 2 FA Cups, a League Cup, a European Cup Winner's Cup, a European Super Cup and a Charity Shield a few years previously. And we had players like Gullit, Vialli, Desailly, Zola, Hasselbaink etc. But sure, we wouldn't have won 3 titles and a European Cup.
The world was a mess but his hair was perfect! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
genericname London 12 Nov 13 8.25am | |
---|---|
Typical Premiership fan comment? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you also a 'Premiership fan'? Ha ha. I know that is against everything you stand for with your misty-eyed, gritty underdog romanticism, but I'm afraid that is a fact Premiership boy. So you don't see anything wrong in scunthorpe fans who never normally show any interest in the club crawling out of the woodwork for a big game? All done up in face paint and jester hats and proudly chanting "scunthorpe till I die" when in reality they're only interested in that one game? I can't stand them. And I'm not criticising Palace fans who are there year-in-year-out (and I know full well there are many, I've not disputed that)....I was only talking about the ones that only want to go when Palace are in the Premier League. As far as I'm aware, that is the exact thing which Palace fans ridicule Brighton fans for. That they were nowhere to be seen until the club showed on-field improvement and built a new stadium....and now they can get 25,000.....even though they used to get 5,000. You lot mock them for that right? Or am I wrong? You don't have to lecture me on supporting a side who don't win anything as I remember when Chelsea hadn't won a major trophy for 26 years and was still attending games then. What I will say is that it can still have it's plus points. As I have already mentioned, 'Success' is relative so a rare victory feels more satisying than if you're winning every week. I recall under Glenn Hoddle when Chelsea hadn't won at home for months on end and we beat Aston Villa (in the 94/95 season). That victory felt a lot better than a league win against Villa would now....just as a draw against one of the top sides back then could feel like a victory. Regarding some of your points on Chelsea..."Yeah Chelsea were ok before Roman". After the things I listed (the trophies, the famous players and consistent European qualification), wouldn't you like Palace to be that 'ok'? And "it's amazing where a few years in the premiership can get you". A few years? Chelsea have competed in the Premiership every single year since it's formation in 1992. Ha ha. Good for you in that you wouldn't want to support Chelsea over Palace....just as I wouldn't want to support Palace over Chelsea. So what would you do if Palace were taken over by a billionaire and became one of the top sides in Europe? Then attracted loads of new fans (like they did this summer, but to a much greater extent)? Would you still support Palace? Or would you be so disgusted that you'd jump ship? Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.29am) Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.31am) Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.34am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
comeonyoueagles20 caterham 12 Nov 13 12.43pm | |
---|---|
Quote genericname at 12 Nov 2013 8.25am
Typical Premiership fan comment? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you also a 'Premiership fan'? Ha ha. I know that is against everything you stand for with your misty-eyed, gritty underdog romanticism, but I'm afraid that is a fact Premiership boy. So you don't see anything wrong in scunthorpe fans who never normally show any interest in the club crawling out of the woodwork for a big game? All done up in face paint and jester hats and proudly chanting "scunthorpe till I die" when in reality they're only interested in that one game? I can't stand them. And I'm not criticising Palace fans who are there year-in-year-out (and I know full well there are many, I've not disputed that)....I was only talking about the ones that only want to go when Palace are in the Premier League. As far as I'm aware, that is the exact thing which Palace fans ridicule Brighton fans for. That they were nowhere to be seen until the club showed on-field improvement and built a new stadium....and now they can get 25,000.....even though they used to get 5,000. You lot mock them for that right? Or am I wrong? You don't have to lecture me on supporting a side who don't win anything as I remember when Chelsea hadn't won a major trophy for 26 years and was still attending games then. What I will say is that it can still have it's plus points. As I have already mentioned, 'Success' is relative so a rare victory feels more satisying than if you're winning every week. I recall under Glenn Hoddle when Chelsea hadn't won at home for months on end and we beat Aston Villa (in the 94/95 season). That victory felt a lot better than a league win against Villa would now....just as a draw against one of the top sides back then could feel like a victory. Regarding some of your points on Chelsea..."Yeah Chelsea were ok before Roman". After the things I listed (the trophies, the famous players and consistent European qualification), wouldn't you like Palace to be that 'ok'? And "it's amazing where a few years in the premiership can get you". A few years? Chelsea have competed in the Premiership every single year since it's formation in 1992. Ha ha. Good for you in that you wouldn't want to support Chelsea over Palace....just as I wouldn't want to support Palace over Chelsea. So what would you do if Palace were taken over by a billionaire and became one of the top sides in Europe? Then attracted loads of new fans (like they did this summer, but to a much greater extent)? Would you still support Palace? Or would you be so disgusted that you'd jump ship? Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.29am) Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.31am) Edited by genericname (12 Nov 2013 8.34am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.