This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Jan 22 8.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Starmer does come across like a naughty schoolboy who's dobbing someone in when he thinks he has something over Boris. It's much the the US situation when you look at their representative and leaders and think 'is this really the best we have to offer?' A rigged game of everyones interests but the common man. Seems that way. I feel more people are thinking it than ever, but not quite enough to change anything. I would like to see an out and out reform party. However, how much reform is possible in four years? Even two terms wouldn't do much when you consider our bureaucracy.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 8.19pm | |
---|---|
Private Eye - Queen declined Downing Street offer of covid rule relaxing for Prince Philips funeral
Attachment: qFJfMqVRXEAExT9z.jpg (87.31Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 8.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Seems that way. I feel more people are thinking it than ever, but not quite enough to change anything. I would like to see an out and out reform party. However, how much reform is possible in four years? Even two terms wouldn't do much when you consider our bureaucracy. Yes, at this point any kind of political shake up or reset could only be a good thing when compared to the current set up. Like you say though, the system is set up in such a way to reject serious change.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Jan 22 8.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Shhhh. Is that your hot air leaking dear?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 8.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Is that your hot air leaking dear? Is that what your wife says as soon as you start talking?
Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 10.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 19 Jan 22 8.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Private Eye - Queen declined Downing Street offer of covid rule relaxing for Prince Philips funeral
With the funerals being the event that loads of people I know are genuinely furious at. Being denied the opportunity to attend them due to Covid whilst they are knocking back the booze in Whitehall.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 8.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
With the funerals being the event that loads of people I know are genuinely furious at. Being denied the opportunity to attend them due to Covid whilst they are knocking back the booze in Whitehall. Indeed. With some maybe the passage of time diminishes what took place, but imagine if people knew this was happening at the time of these sacrifices. The whole thing beggars belief.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 8.54pm | |
---|---|
Quote The 1922 committee of Conservative backbench MPs is considering changing the rules on no confidence votes, Sky's political editor Beth Rigby has learned.
Under the current rules, if a prime minister wins a vote of confidence then they cannot be challenged again for a year. But a proposal was floated for a "super trigger" that means a second ballot could be called within a year. The aim is to give the party "more flexibility" and make the leader "more accountable", Rigby says. MPs could "move quickly" on this as they don't want to change the rules after a ballot. Quote
Hmmm. So is this really to make the PM more accountable or instead to shift the threshold and make accountability far less likely?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 19 Jan 22 9.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Is that what your wife says as soon as you start talking?
Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 8.42pm) I do wish you would leave people's family out of stuff.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 10.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I do wish you would leave people's family out of stuff. It's a 'the mother in law' Les Dawson style joke. It was typed in the garden while knocking back drinks with 20 or 30 people so is beyond reproach. Works do.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 19 Jan 22 10.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
It's a 'the mother in law' Les Dawson style joke. It was typed in the garden while knocking back drinks with 20 or 30 people so is beyond reproach. Works do. Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 10.33pm) I think Boris will do a Blair and just not go....what was it...a million marched over the war and basically nothing happened. Mind you the media loved him. I could be wrong but I think the media will see the limit of its power here.....normally they get what they want but I just can't see Boris going....but either way it will be fascinating. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Jan 2022 10.43pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 22 10.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think Boris will do a Blair and just not go....what was it...a million marched over the war and basically nothing happened. Mind you the media loved him. I could be wrong but I think the media will see the limit of its power here.....normally they get what they want but I just can't see Boris going. He certainly doesn't come across as one to leave without a fight. Then again he doesn't appear to have much enthusiasm for the job either. Maybe fighting is the 'no lose gamble' move in a position like this though, and it's not like he ever admits fault, which would be implied if he stepped aside. I expect that it will all come down to whether enough letters are put in (which might explain the move to change the number required) as once that's been triggered it's hard to recover regardless of the result of the confidence vote.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.