This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 17 Mar 20 11.20pm | |
---|---|
I hope they learn the lessons quickly because I think the real test is going to be when October comes back around again. This virus came to us on the arse end of the cold weather......and unless the vaccine identification and mass production is super fast we face a full winter next time around. They better have spare NHS capacity by then or it isn't going to be pretty.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Mar 20 11.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Mr Wise Guy, you are talking absolute b***ocks, as usual, can you please explain how many Border Force Officers will have arms that are 2 metres long ( the social distance you speak of)? They have to be handed passports and speak to passengers. If that doesn’t make them at risk I do not know what does. Let's just take a look at where the b***ocks really is coming from! Officers don't need to have arms 2 metres long. Many pass through the biometric booths these days. The danger exists for people who are within 2 metres of another person for more than 15 mins. That would be a rarity and for the small number involved a booth could be closed and the special facilities that exist used. These place the traveller in a room to wait whilst checks are made. Should questions need to be asked that take longer than 15 mins it could be done through a screen or window. We could introduce temperature check points through which everyone has to pass before passport control with anyone registering a high reading being picked out for special screening by appropriately trained staff wearing protective clothing. I saw this done in Hong Kong during the SARS virus outbreak. It worked smoothly and wasn't at all disruptive. It's really not rocket science.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 17 Mar 20 11.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Let's just take a look at where the b***ocks really is coming from! Officers don't need to have arms 2 metres long. Many pass through the biometric booths these days. The danger exists for people who are within 2 metres of another person for more than 15 mins. That would be a rarity and for the small number involved a booth could be closed and the special facilities that exist used. These place the traveller in a room to wait whilst checks are made. Should questions need to be asked that take longer than 15 mins it could be done through a screen or window. We could introduce temperature check points through which everyone has to pass before passport control with anyone registering a high reading being picked out for special screening by appropriately trained staff wearing protective clothing. I saw this done in Hong Kong during the SARS virus outbreak. It worked smoothly and wasn't at all disruptive. It's really not rocket science. It might be medical science though.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 18 Mar 20 12.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Obviously the initial spread from one country to the next was caused by the crossing of borders by people....whether immigrants or not. It's certainly true that its spread isn't only caused by immigration....but that wasn't said was it. Immigration worsens the situation for the simple reasons stated and that's partly why borders are being shut around the world. Regardless shutting borders is only one part of fighting this. As for the US situation....the border action is so recent that I'm surprised you've come to such a conclusion and now that the virus has taken root the case number is obviously going to shoot up. How fast and how long depends upon what the strategy is.....Well, to an extent....because percentages of people will do what people do....Unless you're literally suppressing them, which they don't have the infrastructure to do....even if they wanted to.
Come on mate, immigration isn’t a reason to blame. There isn’t much immigration in northern Italy, if there was a reason to blame immigrants and there was a whiff of blame, the press would be all over it and a spread of the virus is a spread of the virus. If anything immigration can slow it down getting to you individually because the average number of people a carrier spreads it to will mean every immigrant means you’re a bit safer or delayed to get it. There will be more deaths from immigration longer term just because there’s more people, and if it’s passed through immigrants then the percentage of fatalities will take a percentage of them also. I’m against previous immigration policies but this blame hasn’t been thought through. You can blame border policies during the virus crisis perhaps but not immigration. Edited by Rudi Hedman (18 Mar 2020 12.19am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 18 Mar 20 12.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Yes you are. Immigration brings more people into the country....more people equals more chance of incoming infections....spreaders and catchers. It's not that difficult. Countries haven't been closing their borders out of boredom.....They are only responsible for their own nationals. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Mar 2020 2.28pm) Well I agree with this. Why take the risk? But I mean people from now, not a few months ago, although I might argue why are a,b or c coming in anyway, but that’s another issue.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 18 Mar 20 1.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Well I agree with this. Why take the risk? But I mean people from now, not a few months ago, although I might argue why are a,b or c coming in anyway, but that’s another issue. I think you see what I meant here. It relates back to WE's post where he couldn't see an argument against immigration in respect of making the situation worse. It was just within that context. We all know that once this virus had evolved that it would get to us eventually. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Mar 2020 2.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 18 Mar 20 5.36am | |
---|---|
Closing the borders is sensible.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 18 Mar 20 8.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
It might be medical science though.
This can’t be right WE doesn’t seem to think so
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 18 Mar 20 9.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think you see what I meant here. It relates back to WE's post where he couldn't see an argument against immigration in respect of making the situation worse. It was just within that context. We all know that once this virus had evolved that it would get to us eventually. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Mar 2020 2.36am) It was late at night and I probably got caught in the frenzy of reactions.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Mar 20 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
It might be medical science though.
It might be many things, although I haven't heard those claims. The truth seems to be that no-one really yet knows, hence the cautious approach. I did hear yesterday that someone has suggested it could be airborne which could turn everything upside down. Nevertheless, the current advice is to maintain a 2 metre separation from anybody you are likely to be in the company of for 15 mins or more. That I believe is based on the knowledge of the way similar viruses transmit. I am following that advice and think that unless and until it is updated we all should. If we all have different strategies then chaos could result.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 18 Mar 20 10.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It might be many things, although I haven't heard those claims. The truth seems to be that no-one really yet knows, hence the cautious approach. I did hear yesterday that someone has suggested it could be airborne which could turn everything upside down. Nevertheless, the current advice is to maintain a 2 metre separation from anybody you are likely to be in the company of for 15 mins or more. That I believe is based on the knowledge of the way similar viruses transmit. I am following that advice and think that unless and until it is updated we all should. If we all have different strategies then chaos could result. The only reason I could see for specifying a distance length and time would be as an estimate on the concentration strength compared to an average person's immune strength......there are obviously going to be different virus concentration strengths and different immune strengths. I wouldn't take it as gospel...Interaction will carry risk, the older and weaker the immune system the higher the risk. In other words, I mean, you don't need a stopwatch and tape measure.....You need to avoid the water vapor that they breath out...So it's using your common. For example, you could walk into the space that an infected person had walked out of and still be the correct distance away but breathe in their water vapor or transmit it via hands.....our bodies deal with viruses every day.....it's much more about how strong your immune system is. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Mar 2020 10.34am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 18 Mar 20 10.08am | |
---|---|
Jeremy Hunt on Newsnight: “In retrospect I can see the cuts to social care were in a way the most silent but also the most devastating.” If only he’d been in a position to do something about it...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.