You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 23 2024 7.55pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

2020 US Presidential Election. (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 44 of 442 < 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 >

Topic Locked

Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 04 Oct 20 12.27am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

.

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (04 Oct 2020 12.30am)

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 04 Oct 20 12.29am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Gonna butt in on this, it's the wrong thread, but so what. Under 65's make up a far larger proportion of the population than the 70-80 age group. And I mean immensely larger Posting %'s like that is pure manipulation of statistics.

You are advocating saving a relatively few older or vulnerable people to the detriment of millions of healthy people.

Virtue signal all you want, but the repercussions of this lockdown nonsense will kill manifold more than C-19 virus victims.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 04 Oct 20 7.22am

Originally posted by Mapletree

Not significantly? Under 65s the CFR is 1%. You do the ‘math’. I make it 8 times higher

Indeed. And Trump may be fine in a matter of days but we do know from his chief of staff that it is, or was, far from a case of breezing through it and he was put on oxygen at the White House not as a precaution but because his "blood oxygen level dropped rapidly" and "we were real concerned".

Edited by BlueJay (04 Oct 2020 7.22am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 04 Oct 20 7.53am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Just for the record I have absolutely no time at all for the organisation which calls itself "Black Lives Matter", so there's no chance of me doing what you suggest. I want to remove skin colour from the debate and not draw attention to it.

I am though in tune with the sentiment which lies behind the phrase "black lives matter".

Then you are deluded.

You have zero to offer organisations that have had a lot of success emphasising their skin colour and identity group. I could reel off endless non white groups that specifically emphasise their ethnic group.

It doesn't matter what you think about 'skin colour' (it's ethnic group). What matters is how those others think about it.

Do you even think about that?

Look at how much they have gained using identity politics from middle class liberals like you. You have made plenty of statements on here that buy into their victim narrative and hence you justify their tactics.

People who think that individualistic arguments about equality are going to succeed over ethnic collectives just don't know any history.

Individualism has only ever succeeded with Europeans.

You have nothing to offer collectives except their extinction and they have nothing to offer you but their laughter.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Oct 2020 3.32pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 04 Oct 20 8.05am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Not significantly? Under 65s the CFR is 1%. You do the ‘math’. I make it 8 times higher

I would view a 92 percent survival rate amongst the most ill and vulnerable within society as not a significant risk of death.

However, it is a risk and some precautions for that group were always justified.

However, what the karens and kens have done to our economy has been disastrous and will have caused and contributed to many more deaths amongst all age ranges covering many different causes.....unemployment, for example, causes misery and contributes to increased levels of death.

We are in a self made recession and the poor can't afford the price rises to feed their families. People have missed serious diagnoses, that will mean death for them. All for a lockdown that only delays infection in the hope of a vaccine that can promise nothing as a silver bullet.

Some people supported the actions that led to these consequences. I am not one of them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Oct 2020 8.20am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Helmet46 Flag Croydon 04 Oct 20 8.15am Send a Private Message to Helmet46 Add Helmet46 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I did and I do. Referendums have no legal role in UK democracy. That though was only said because someone else brought it up.

Yeah but I bet you would have felt a lot more betrayed if the Govt had taken us out of the EU without one.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Oct 20 10.14am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I would view a 92 percent survival rate amongst the most ill and vulnerable within society as not a significant risk of death.

However, it is a risk and some precautions for that group were always justified.

However, what the karens and kens have done to our economy has been disastrous and will have caused and contributed to many more deaths amongst all age ranges covering many different causes.....unemployment, for example, causes misery and contributes to increased levels of death.

We are in a self made recession and the poor can't afford the price rises to feed their families. People have missed serious diagnoses, that will mean death for them. All for a lockdown that only delays infection in the hope of a vaccine that can promise nothing as a silver bullet.

Some people supported the actions that led to these consequences. I am not one of them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Oct 2020 8.20am)

Yes, such a small price to pay. You seem to have overlooked the longer term effects of having had Covid-19, especially for older people. Probably also not really important if it gets in the way of you visiting all your Black mates, eh?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Oct 20 11.20am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I'll translate the above for those unfamiliar with "Hrolfspeak".

"I've run out of arguments and insults so will just recycle my last one"

Arguing with stupid or delusional people is a waste of time. I have probably wasted too much time on you already.
When you actually say something that exists in the realm of reality, I might answer it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 04 Oct 20 12.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Yes, such a small price to pay. You seem to have overlooked the longer term effects of having had Covid-19, especially for older people. Probably also not really important if it gets in the way of you visiting all your Black mates, eh?


I wager I have helped and have more respect for blacks than you have. I also care about how this economic disaster will affect their children and their vulnerable in the third world.....You on the other hand can plot your eventual escape to the aforementioned Prague...with it's notable absence of any of them.

As for this virus, you call what's happened a 'small price to pay'. While I note the personal tragedy you have suffered, I also note the personal tragedies of many others that you are minimizing and ignoring here.

As for longer terms affects....that's a reality with many illnesses....and we don't close down the economy over them.

Not only is the logic of what we undertook in national lockdowns highly suspect it also didn't and could never have worked.

I acknowledge however that the idea of economic and national lockdowns would suit the 'control freaky' hubris of certain personalities who would think that the grand scale of restricting a nation's liberties would significantly affect the actual 'real world' physical realities of very infectious viruses.

You can't close 'open systems', you can only delay and with that in mind destroying an economy over an under 1 percent death rate is ridiculous......Hell, we can't even stop economic migrants crossing our channel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Oct 2020 2.14pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Spiderman Flag Horsham 04 Oct 20 12.42pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Helmet46

Yeah but I bet you would have felt a lot more betrayed if the Govt had taken us out of the EU without one.

Now you’ve done it!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Spiderman Flag Horsham 04 Oct 20 12.46pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I suggest you take your own advice and stop complaining.

As others will have read the comment I responded to I will decide for myself whether I wish to respond. Whether you read it is your choice.

Who’s complaining? Reading your relentless twaddle cheers me up in the mornings, although a change of record occasionally wouldn’t go amiss

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Matov Flag 04 Oct 20 1.48pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Helmet46

Yeah but I bet you would have felt a lot more betrayed if the Govt had taken us out of the EU without one.


Parliament could have. That is their right. But with regards to Brexit they CHOSE, by a HUGE majority, to decide to pass that decision over to the British people in a referendum. A perfectly legal political process. And to save the usual suspects the bother, a referendum is not like a plebiscite in that the result itself was not legally binding on the Government of the day. However, and once again by a HUGE majority, Parliament agreed to the Article 50 process being undertaken and now we have, after a few more twists and turns, left the EU.

At every stage, and stress tested to death by our legal system, the method by which we departed the EU has been perfectly legal and in line with British democratic principles.

Edited by Matov (04 Oct 2020 1.49pm)

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 44 of 442 < 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic