This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
PalazioVecchio south pole 20 Mar 23 10.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I would prefer he did what every citizen should do. Which is abide by the law and assist those who keep the law. If anyone stumbles on information they pass it to the police. i heard a rumour that he had a cousin raped by a gang ? anybody knows ? those who keep the Law ? which law ? as laid out in which Books ? the Law which designates a 14 year old white girl to be a 'kuffir'...a mere chattel to be passed around from man to man ? and repeatedly raped ? ''those who keep the Law''....like the Charlie Hebdo attackers...keeping the Blasphemy laws all current and enforced ? Wisbech, the levels of delusions in your writings are beyond a joke sometimes. And there is nothing funny about thousands of girls and an industrial level of gang rapes.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Mar 23 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
i heard a rumour that he had a cousin raped by a gang ? anybody knows ? those who keep the Law ? which law ? as laid out in which Books ? the Law which designates a 14 year old white girl to be a 'kuffir'...a mere chattel to be passed around from man to man ? and repeatedly raped ? ''those who keep the Law''....like the Charlie Hebdo attackers...keeping the Blasphemy laws all current and enforced ? Wisbech, the levels of delusions in your writings are beyond a joke sometimes. And there is nothing funny about thousands of girls and an industrial level of gang rapes. There is only one law in our country. Anyone who claims otherwise, or believes that our authorities believe otherwise, is lying. This is not about whether those involved in grooming gangs break the law. They do, and must be detected, restrained, and punished. That though is not our job, or that of self-appointed vigilantes, no matter if they are well-meaning. Which Yaxley-Lennon is not. Never have I argued that these people aren't serious criminals who must be dealt with. All I argue is that YL makes things worse, not better.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 20 Mar 23 5.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There is only one law in our country. Anyone who claims otherwise, or believes that our authorities believe otherwise, is lying. This is not about whether those involved in grooming gangs break the law. They do, and must be detected, restrained, and punished. That though is not our job, or that of self-appointed vigilantes, no matter if they are well-meaning. Which Yaxley-Lennon is not. Never have I argued that these people aren't serious criminals who must be dealt with. All I argue is that YL makes things worse, not better. The people whose job it was to, as you say, detect, restrain and punish, did not though - for years. They didn't even have to detect anything, they were told repeatedly what was going on and they deliberately turned a blind eye. Edited by georgenorman (20 Mar 2023 5.06pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 20 Mar 23 6.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The people whose job it was to, as you say, detect, restrain and punish, did not though - for years. They didn't even have to detect anything, they were told repeatedly what was going on and they deliberately turned a blind eye. Edited by georgenorman (20 Mar 2023 5.06pm) when normal Law enforcement fails, you will always see mob Law. Such are the repeated lessons of history.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Mar 23 8.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The people whose job it was to, as you say, detect, restrain and punish, did not though - for years. They didn't even have to detect anything, they were told repeatedly what was going on and they deliberately turned a blind eye. Edited by georgenorman (20 Mar 2023 5.06pm) The police have accepted that they ought to have done more earlier, having been criticised in investigations. Which I thought was more than a little unfair, given the way their funding has been cut whilst the need for their work has increased. Whatever they did was always going to attract criticism about something from somewhere. Their strategy wasn't working, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one or, more importantly in the context of Yaxley-Lennon, that interference from rabble rousers was helpful.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Mar 23 8.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
when normal Law enforcement fails, you will always see mob Law. Such are the repeated lessons of history. For normal law enforcement to work in abnormal circumstances it is necessary for it to be funded extraordinarily. Don't blame our police. Blame those who write the cheques.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 20 Mar 23 9.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The police have accepted that they ought to have done more earlier, having been criticised in investigations. Which I thought was more than a little unfair, given the way their funding has been cut whilst the need for their work has increased. Whatever they did was always going to attract criticism about something from somewhere. Their strategy wasn't working, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one or, more importantly in the context of Yaxley-Lennon, that interference from rabble rousers was helpful. You are seriously putting forward funding as the cause of them ignoring pakistani-heritage-rape-gangs? Many people for a long time, from all quarters, were telling them exactly what was going on. They themselves have admitted that they did not want to appear racist in investigating it. You are plumbing new depths in the absurdity of your posts.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 20 Mar 23 9.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The police have accepted that they ought to have done more earlier, having been criticised in investigations. Which I thought was more than a little unfair, given the way their funding has been cut whilst the need for their work has increased. Whatever they did was always going to attract criticism about something from somewhere. Their strategy wasn't working, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one or, more importantly in the context of Yaxley-Lennon, that interference from rabble rousers was helpful. Yes, they had a strategy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 21 Mar 23 7.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
You are seriously putting forward funding as the cause of them ignoring pakistani-heritage-rape-gangs? Many people for a long time, from all quarters, were telling them exactly what was going on. They themselves have admitted that they did not want to appear racist in investigating it. You are plumbing new depths in the absurdity of your posts. This, just when you thought it couldn't get more deranged
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 21 Mar 23 8.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
You are seriously putting forward funding as the cause of them ignoring pakistani-heritage-rape-gangs? Many people for a long time, from all quarters, were telling them exactly what was going on. They themselves have admitted that they did not want to appear racist in investigating it. You are plumbing new depths in the absurdity of your posts. As I have said the police have accepted that, with hindsight, the strategy they adopted wasn't effective. How and who devised that strategy remains unknown. Whether it was adopted because of a lack of resources to tackle it aggressively, or because it was considered the long-term route to the best outcomes, is therefore also unknown. So I don't know if it was the cause. Do you, or anyone else here know, or just think you know? It's far from absurd to accept uncertainty. What's certain is that the police have regarded YL's activities as unhelpful.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 21 Mar 23 9.15am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I have said the police have accepted that, with hindsight, the strategy they adopted wasn't effective. How and who devised that strategy remains unknown. Whether it was adopted because of a lack of resources to tackle it aggressively, or because it was considered the long-term route to the best outcomes, is therefore also unknown. So I don't know if it was the cause. Do you, or anyone else here know, or just think you know? It's far from absurd to accept uncertainty. What's certain is that the police have regarded YL's activities as unhelpful. They have accepted that their strategy of ignoring streams of reports telling them what was going on wasn’t effective! So you think it a possibility that it was considered the ‘long-term route to the best outcome’! Far from absurd?! It is clearly absurd to try to dress up the police incompetence and disgraceful lack of responsibility in this matter as some sort of cunning plan. If people can be prosecuted for standing still and silently praying, then surely the police involved in this should be prosecuted for standing silently, ignoring children being raped when they were well aware of it. Of course they regard their critics' activities as unhelpful – unhelpful to their efforts of covering up their culpability. Edited by georgenorman (21 Mar 2023 9.19am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 21 Mar 23 9.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Edited by georgenorman (21 Mar 2023 9.19am) Nothing to do with the presence of 'block-voting' in the Muslim community ? and an absence of the same in the Christian community ? Politicians know who their boss is. And if they forget that fact, they are out on their ear.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.