You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > General Election 2017
November 23 2024 11.34am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

General Election 2017

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 433 of 450 < 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 >

  

croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 15 Jun 17 3.30am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Are you on my side of the cenotaph or the excited morons?

your side mate, your side! That said in true trump say it twice styly!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 15 Jun 17 6.40am

Originally posted by nickgusset

When is the Queens speech anyone? I really do think parliament should be convening in this hour of tragedy. Questions need to be asked and legislation put in place asap. We can't be in a state of flux for too long.

Have self-censored my little joke about Peter Mandelson.

Edited by hedgehog50 (15 Jun 2017 6.59am)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 15 Jun 17 8.17am Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by We are goin up!


No. Voting is democracy, and we just had a general election in which Labour got 5% LESS of the vote than the Conservatives. McDonnell is a really nasty piece of work.

5%? Not sure that's quite right...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 15 Jun 17 8.30am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

No, he didn't, Nick. Not by any measurement did he do well. Not as well as Brown, Miliband or Kinnock, all of whom had the dignity and common decency to stand down.

Edited by Cucking Funt (15 Jun 2017 12.40am)

Why would he stand down? He closed nearly a 20 point gap in the polls in an election where it was assumed that the Tories would greatly increase their majority leaving a hung parliament and a Tory party in disarray.

The momentum is with Labour and Corbyn now seems to have galvanised the party and won over a lot of the public.

The fact that more people in work, more educated, and every age group under 50 voted more for Labour than the Tories shows that the Tories are on the ropes.

Once the economic side effects of Brexit truly hit this is a lame duck government which could be obliterated whenever the next general election ends up being.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 15 Jun 17 8.40am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

No, he didn't, Nick. Not by any measurement did he do well. Not as well as Brown, Miliband or Kinnock, all of whom had the dignity and common decency to stand down.

Edited by Cucking Funt (15 Jun 2017 12.40am)

Well, the position he was in, and now asking him to step aside would be akin to Palace coming fourth this season then losing 3-2 on aggregate to Juventus in the Champions League semi-final the following season and then wanting our manager to be sacked because we lost.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 15 Jun 17 8.57am

Originally posted by DanH

Why would he stand down? He closed nearly a 20 point gap in the polls in an election where it was assumed that the Tories would greatly increase their majority leaving a hung parliament and a Tory party in disarray.

The momentum is with Labour and Corbyn now seems to have galvanised the party and won over a lot of the public.

The fact that more people in work, more educated, and every age group under 50 voted more for Labour than the Tories shows that the Tories are on the ropes.

Once the economic side effects of Brexit truly hit this is a lame duck government which could be obliterated whenever the next general election ends up being.


Indeedy!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 15 Jun 17 9.08am Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

One of the more interesting stats from the election vote was the every group of working age people, irrespective of whether they are full time, part time, unemployed etc. voted for Labour by 4% or more above the Tory vote.

The only employment status group to vote in favour of the Tories were retired people.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 15 Jun 17 9.29am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

One of the more interesting stats from the election vote was the every group of working age people, irrespective of whether they are full time, part time, unemployed etc. voted for Labour by 4% or more above the Tory vote.

The only employment status group to vote in favour of the Tories were retired people.

Yep. There's a lot of stats that have come out of the voting trends which would petrify my if I were a Tory. It appears that the traditional Labour/Tory voter demographic is no longer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 15 Jun 17 10.12am Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Yep. There's a lot of stats that have come out of the voting trends which would petrify my if I were a Tory. It appears that the traditional Labour/Tory voter demographic is no longer.


Would appear to me that the promise of an unsustainable amount of free stuff is what smashed the demographics. I know three sets of parents who voted Corbyn (having previously voted Tory) because he promised to get rid of their children's student debt. Who wouldn't want that to happen for their children? But more to the point, who's actually going to pay for it?

The Labour manifesto was irresponsible and absurd. In another post you called the current government a lame duck in waiting. Perhaps you're right. But a year of Corbyn in power would obliterate the Labour party for good. Marxism never works.

I could f*cking murder Theresa May for calling this election. It was completely unnecessary and it has backfired on her party, but much more importantly her country, massively.

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 15 Jun 17 10.20am

Originally posted by We are goin up!


Would appear to me that the promise of an unsustainable amount of free stuff is what smashed the demographics. I know three sets of parents who voted Corbyn (having previously voted Tory) because he promised to get rid of their children's student debt. Who wouldn't want that to happen for their children? But more to the point, who's actually going to pay for it?

The Labour manifesto was irresponsible and absurd. In another post you called the current government a lame duck in waiting. Perhaps you're right. But a year of Corbyn in power would obliterate the Labour party for good. Marxism never works.

I could f*cking murder Theresa May for calling this election. It was completely unnecessary and it has backfired on her party, but much more importantly her country, massively.

It's not her country. It's our country.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 15 Jun 17 10.40am Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by We are goin up!


Would appear to me that the promise of an unsustainable amount of free stuff is what smashed the demographics. I know three sets of parents who voted Corbyn (having previously voted Tory) because he promised to get rid of their children's student debt. Who wouldn't want that to happen for their children? But more to the point, who's actually going to pay for it?

The Labour manifesto was irresponsible and absurd. In another post you called the current government a lame duck in waiting. Perhaps you're right. But a year of Corbyn in power would obliterate the Labour party for good. Marxism never works.

I could f*cking murder Theresa May for calling this election. It was completely unnecessary and it has backfired on her party, but much more importantly her country, massively.

Labour's fully costed manifesto that brings the UK into line with many other northern European countries you mean?

Many of the policies are totally manageable, and increasing tax burdens marginally on the highest earners and companies (again to bring them more in line with OEDC) is hardly irresponsible or absurd.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 15 Jun 17 11.04am Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

Labour's fully costed manifesto that brings the UK into line with many other northern European countries you mean?

Many of the policies are totally manageable, and increasing tax burdens marginally on the highest earners and companies (again to bring them more in line with OEDC) is hardly irresponsible or absurd.

How does he equate paying 3% more tax on incomes over £80,000 with marxism?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 433 of 450 < 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > General Election 2017