You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Chilcott Inquiry Predictions...
November 23 2024 10.24am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Chilcott Inquiry Predictions...

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 06 Jul 16 2.06pm Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

Hans Blix to the Beeb

We carried out about 700 [searches] in 500 different sites before the war broke out, and we didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. We told Mr Blair, and we told the others in the Security Council that we did not find any weapons.

I had a conversation on the telephone with Mr Blair on the 20th of February 2003, in which I said we were not impressed with intelligence that he had referred to, and I said it would be paradoxical if they invaded Iraq with 250,000 men and found very little.

But he responded [that] he was very convinced about the national intelligence he had received. Which turned out to be wrong."

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DivingIsNotGood Flag se25 06 Jul 16 2.26pm

Not only should Blair get half a million life sentences for the deaths in Iraq, he should also be tried for the MURDER of Dr Kelly.

 


VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
DivingIsNotGood Flag se25 06 Jul 16 2.27pm

Britain's biggest ever serial killer is Tony Blair FACT

 


VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Crystal_Clear Flag Belfast 06 Jul 16 4.37pm Send a Private Message to Crystal_Clear Add Crystal_Clear as a friend

He still claims that the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein.

Just look at the state of Iraq now !!!! And how if affects the rest of the world.

And I believe that was part of the report, on how things would be if Saddam was removed, which appears to have been simply ignored.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 06 Jul 16 4.42pm

Originally posted by Crystal_Clear

He still claims that the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein.

Just look at the state of Iraq now !!!! And how if affects the rest of the world.

And I believe that was part of the report, on how things would be if Saddam was removed, which appears to have been simply ignored.

A rhetorical statement. Its like saying the world is better without Hitler in it. Of course it is, but the question is whether Iraq is better off, or the middle east or the rest of the world. The whole region has been wracked with instability and IS has massively benefited and flourished as a result - something it probably could never have done without the Iraq invasion (certainly not to the scale it has). Indeed, the Syrian regimes greatest ally in the region was the Saddam regime - The capacity by which IS has been able to operate across the two borders would never have been possible prior to 2003.

It annoys me that no one calls him on this kind of bullsh*t

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Jul 16 5.13pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

A rhetorical statement. Its like saying the world is better without Hitler in it. Of course it is, but the question is whether Iraq is better off, or the middle east or the rest of the world. The whole region has been wracked with instability and IS has massively benefited and flourished as a result - something it probably could never have done without the Iraq invasion (certainly not to the scale it has). Indeed, the Syrian regimes greatest ally in the region was the Saddam regime - The capacity by which IS has been able to operate across the two borders would never have been possible prior to 2003.

It annoys me that no one calls him on this kind of bullsh*t

Saddam invaded Kuwait that is a fact. We sent him packing and somewhere down the line the Americans decided to finish the Job. Despite the predictable mess that created, we still helped unseat Gadaffi and went into Afghanistan. We could not possibly have done this without knowing that Libya would become another Iraq or knowing that the Russians spent ages fighting the Taliban with little achieved.
One can only conclude that the agenda was not really about removing dictators to improve the situation in that country or making inroads into destroying terrorist breeding grounds.
Something else was at the centre of the agenda and it could only be oil, money or some wider long term military objective. Perhaps all of those.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 06 Jul 16 6.04pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Seven plus years, 2.5 million words, lord knows how many million of £'s - and the conclusions are those that any half intelligent person could have come to within 24 hours of being given the most basic facts.

Who has benefited from all this showboating nonsense?

The Iraqi people? their half million dead?
the families of the dead UK troops?

No - must be someone/something else!

Suggestions welcome!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 06 Jul 16 6.12pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by rob1969

Seven plus years, 2.5 million words, lord knows how many million of £'s - and the conclusions are those that any half intelligent person could have come to within 24 hours of being given the most basic facts.

Who has benefited from all this showboating nonsense?

The Iraqi people? their half million dead?
the families of the dead UK troops?

No - must be someone/something else!

Suggestions welcome!

American companies.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
palace_in_frogland Flag In a broken dream 06 Jul 16 7.16pm Send a Private Message to palace_in_frogland Add palace_in_frogland as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

American companies.

And British ones.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 06 Jul 16 10.34pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

"Take the decision, I took the decision. Don't say I was lying blah blah bliar bliar."

He had already made the decision and fitted the findngs around it. The decision was not based on the findings but the findings were fitted around the decision.

He committed us and couldn't go back on it. Shut everyone in cabinet and govt out of discussions.

This man and his assistants at the time should not be allowed to walk away from this.

Hundreds of thousands have died, ISIS rose from imprisonment in Iraq and Iraq is now a dangerous place to be, or just never go back to. Apparently you were better off just keeping your head down under Saddam. He was evil to a few, but there was order. Now you're in danger of having your head blown off.

Not to mention the fleeing of the country, further unsettling in the region and mass movement of millions of people. And he was made peace envoy of the Middle East?

Way to go, Tony. Real hero. He suffered a Messiah Complex following Kosovo and knew best. Better than any advice or experience in the region before. He was warned of the consequences and ignored it all.

Not only liberate the world, he wanted to remain close allies of the US and develop his relationship with Bush and the US. He has made millions and ruined the lives of millions. The man is a disgrace and I don't buy his sombre and regretful tone. It's because it's all come out.

Maybe he and Bush saw Saddam as too big a figure in the region and wanted to act rather than react but they too a big gamble and the WMD they wanted to be there never was. It might wash in the US with Tony's appearances on chat shows but it shouldn't here.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
blackpalacefan Flag 06 Jul 16 10.42pm Send a Private Message to blackpalacefan Add blackpalacefan as a friend

Blair is a sinister individual. He's always cashing in at every turn too. How about when he was the middle east peace envoy. What a joke.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bill E Pilgrim Flag New Addington 06 Jul 16 10.54pm Send a Private Message to Bill E Pilgrim Add Bill E Pilgrim as a friend

Originally posted by -TUX-

The Establishment 1-0 The Plebs.

As long as you number the Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Sun and the Express among the establishment (which they certainly are).

The job of a free press in a democracy is too hold government to account. This lot went AWOL and backed the war with slavish loyalty, other than a few token pieces.

Now they cry foul the incompetent hypocrites.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Chilcott Inquiry Predictions...