This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Palace Fan Arrested For 'Inciting Racial Hatred'
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 25 Mar 16 2.19pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
"I cannot hide my pain today. A true Muslim was punished for doing which [sic] the collective will of the nation failed to carry out." Should I be holding my breath for this p***k to be treated similarly? AH!! The 'Old' been misquoted? get out of jail card all these scumbags use.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
jamiemartin721  Reading 25 Mar 16 4.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
I think they are unfounded because surely they should only act after the woman he supposedly addressed complained, which does not appear to be the case? This seems like a collosal waste time and money & I would prefer the Police to be concentrating on security following recent terrorist events in Europe. Incitement doesn't require a complaint, only an intent on behalf of the party.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 25 Mar 16 4.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Then the law is an ass. I just do not understand how if there is no compliant, no evidence that he did this from a third party and, more to the point, how this is exactly 'racist'. If he had racially berated someone and this was witnessed, agree, the bloke should be done, like that woman on the tram a few years ago. However, this just seems to be Twitter bollocks and a collosal waste of everyone's time. Its not racist, the reporting is using a popular abbreviation of the Religious and Racial Hatred Act 2006. In reality, the charge relates to the Religious not racial aspect of the law.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 25 Mar 16 4.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
"I cannot hide my pain today. A true Muslim was punished for doing which [sic] the collective will of the nation failed to carry out." Should I be holding my breath for this p***k to be treated similarly? He should be, but it looks like he's already gone for a better legal defence of actually making the CPS prove intent.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 25 Mar 16 4.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
AH!! The 'Old' been misquoted? get out of jail card all these scumbags use. Its a good defence, puts an emphasis on reasonable doubt, and the prosecution only has the here say testimony of witnesses (who may well not want to give evidence against the Imam). Where as CPFC boy has digitally preserved the evidence of his actions, and seems to have a bit of 'history' with other social media posts.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 25 Mar 16 4.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Incitement doesn't require a complaint, only an intent on behalf of the party. that doesn't make sense.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| davenotamonkey 25 Mar 16 5.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Its a good defence, puts an emphasis on reasonable doubt, and the prosecution only has the here say testimony of witnesses (who may well not want to give evidence against the Imam). Where as CPFC boy has digitally preserved the evidence of his actions, and seems to have a bit of 'history' with other social media posts. Our friendly Immam wrote these messages via WhatsApp, not smoke-signal. These is a digital record of these as well.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 25 Mar 16 5.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
that doesn't make sense. The victim or a witness does not need to report it: it is enough that the event occurred to be illegal.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
coulsdoneagle  London 25 Mar 16 5.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
To think that some of my tax money is funding this nonsense. The law on racial hatred should be very carefully applied. Not liking a group is hardly a crime....or is it now. We are living in an age where if you don't like a group of people you better not express it. Is this really the direction we should be heading in? Not liking a group of people, what exactly do you mean?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 25 Mar 16 6.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by pefwin
The victim or a witness does not need to report it: it is enough that the event occurred to be illegal. And how is it proved if a witness or victim doesn't report it? What is the due process? It doesn't make sense.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
palace_in_frogland  In a broken dream 25 Mar 16 7.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If a tree falls in a forest and no-one is there to hear it...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 25 Mar 16 7.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
And how is it proved if a witness or victim doesn't report it? What is the due process? It doesn't make sense. LoL. If a murder took place and the witness is the murderer(S) and the victim is dead. Did it occur? I would say ask Stephen Lawrence. I assume his Tw@tter feed is admissible? Not that I have that much interest in what is after all an everyday happenstance. For me if a tw@t in the street went up to your daughter, sister, mother, grandmother and started ask weird questions (any subject), especially in front of you what would you do? I know what I would have done the damn fool.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.