You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Richard Seymour - vile human being.
November 23 2024 8.38pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Richard Seymour - vile human being.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Sep 15 2.04pm

Quote matt_himself at 04 Sep 2015 1.54pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.

I think he means the Falklands, which had no indigenous population.

Incidently the Celts were the first known occupiers of the British Isles, probably from the picts (which means in celtic, before us).


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 04 Sep 15 2.20pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 2.04pm

Quote matt_himself at 04 Sep 2015 1.54pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.

I think he means the Falklands, which had no indigenous population.

Incidently the Celts were the first known occupiers of the British Isles, probably from the picts (which means in celtic, before us).



I did.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 04 Sep 15 5.33pm

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 8.40am

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Sep 2015 8.38am

Crass and stupid attention seeker but he hasn't dropped a barrel bomb on a load of children. Ignore him.


Funny how your defending him as a lefty, if it was someone from the right making equally crass comments about immigrants you'd be slaughtering them.

The lefts hypocrissy knows no bounds.

As you say nothing worse than some people have written about refuges on these boards. However, I don't like either of them.

To be honest Weston has a point, but Corbyn's plan isn't to handed to Argentina but share ownership which I find just as unpalatable but more factually correct.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 04 Sep 15 5.44pm

As a pure blood Beaker man... " Celts Go Home!".

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Sep 15 7.09pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 2.04pm

Quote matt_himself at 04 Sep 2015 1.54pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.

I think he means the Falklands, which had no indigenous population.

Incidently the Celts were the first known occupiers of the British Isles, probably from the picts (which means in celtic, before us).


No such thing.
And you have forgotten the Beaker people for one.

He did mean the Falklands BTW.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 04 Sep 15 7.30pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 7.09pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 2.04pm

Quote matt_himself at 04 Sep 2015 1.54pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.

I think he means the Falklands, which had no indigenous population.

Incidently the Celts were the first known occupiers of the British Isles, probably from the picts (which means in celtic, before us).


No such thing.
And you have forgotten the Beaker people for one.

He did mean the Falklands BTW.

anti-semite!

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 04 Sep 15 7.48pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 8.40am

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Sep 2015 8.38am

Crass and stupid attention seeker but he hasn't dropped a barrel bomb on a load of children. Ignore him.


Funny how your defending him as a lefty, if it was someone from the right making equally crass comments about immigrants you'd be slaughtering them.

The lefts hypocrissy knows no bounds.


No. Barking up the wrong tree on that one. I am saying there are more important issues at the moment than paying attention to some insecure rent-a-gob. Which is exactly what you have done. And he will be loving every word of it.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palacetinian Flag Surrey Fam 04 Sep 15 9.20pm Send a Private Message to Palacetinian Add Palacetinian as a friend

Just trying to emulate Katie Hopkins to get publicity and a highly paid TV show...

 


Supporting Crystal Palace since 19.45 on 29th August 1972 (approximately)!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Red Al Flag Reading 04 Sep 15 10.32pm Send a Private Message to Red Al Add Red Al as a friend

I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter?

Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press.

As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
suicideatselhurst Flag crawley 05 Sep 15 1.49am

Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm

I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter?

Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press.

As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!



Who said that ?

 


Theres someone in my head ... But its not me

X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Northern Panda Flag Warrington 05 Sep 15 8.51am Send a Private Message to Northern Panda Add Northern Panda as a friend

This "thing" is the epitome of a generation that believes their point of of view is correct and that anything that vies either left or right is wrong. He does not have the commitment to become a journalist and thus spouts abusive trite to justify his self importance. Anyone with half a brain knows exactly what he is about...an offensive bigot.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
oldcodger Flag 05 Sep 15 9.03am Send a Private Message to oldcodger Add oldcodger as a friend

No matter who it's coming from that is a horrendous and terrible thing to say. He should be ashamed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Richard Seymour - vile human being.