What constitutes an anti-British community though?

In terms of the UK, terrorism, seems to have a history of being by people who are British (UK Born Muslims and British Irish).

High crime rates among migrant communities, is that a production of the migration, or the economic factors - Is it a universal factor that all migrant communities have higher crime rates?

Strain on Housing? Maybe a factor, but its hardly driving it, and I'd imagine that a large number of people who rent properties in the UK would struggle to meet their mortgages without migrants.

Education, seems that certain ethnic groups fare much better in UK education, that the 'traditional' ethnic groups.

In a twist of irony, so am I. I generally believe that the UK's first responsibility is to fill employment from its own citizens, and that the use of EU migrant labour undermines the working class across the board.

Illegal Immigrants - Those employing illegal migrant labour should be targeted, Imprisoned and have their assets seized. Those involved in human trafficking are little more than slave traders, and should be considered an enemy of the state. Those caught working illegally, should be processed and deported, unless they are acting as a witness for the prosecution, in which case special circumstances for citizenship should be made based on individual circumstances.

Working migration should only exist to fill areas of skill shortage, not jobs anyone reasonably capable person could do.

Migration through marriage etc - Fair enough, if you're having people working in the UK, you have to allow for the possibility of them falling in love with residents and settling down. Similarly, after a long enough period of working in the UK, you have to start to consider that person as a potential citizen as well.

The only area I don't think we can really skimp on is Refugees and Asylum, simply on humanitarian grounds. I don't think permanent residence should be granted unless safe return inside of ten years is unlikely.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

There is but most of the time they say they'll be persecuted in their country of origin for x, y or z and some moron says we can't deport them. Be it they're gay or alcoholic or they just use the old "right to a family life" line or some other such bollocks. Plenty of times there's been no family but by the time the case gets to court... You've guessed it.

Or they fight you to the death in the case of one Angolan bloke they did get on a plane.

Optimistic as ever

They're eligible for automatic deportation after they've served their sentence. There are issues, as Stuk pointed out, that in fact they retain legal rights under deportation laws (as do their family).

If they're here under Asylum laws its almost impossible to deport them, for obvious reasons.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Then they get to return home. Clearly you can't use countries which are 'unstable' or a 'risk' (can't send a gay man to Angola who's fled Iran) , but clearly if you're not happy relocating to Mexico or Western Super-Mare your life isn't at risk, and you can go back to Syria.

That's how I see it. Even Preston should look a better option to someone who is a genuine refugee.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

More disproven, as the cat wasn't even mentioned in the Judges summing up. The oddity here is more that its the other parties rights that are considered affected (its not so much the convicts right to a family life, but his partner - who if he was deported would be deemed to being punished unfairly, similarly their children).

Odd as that sounds.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

But that won't be fair if their mate lucked in and got UK, for example.

I like the idea but they'll find a reason why they can't go to every country they don't want to go to.

Optimistic as ever