You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 23 2024 11.49am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 390 of 435 < 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 10.23pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

Previously, on the 'wicked-tories' thread, you asked for details of how taxes could be cut. Along with the number of ways that I listed, I should have included scrapping the TV Licence fee, which would save £3.8 billion a year.

The BBC would still have to be paid for, unless you want to scrap that too, when even more would need to be spent on other services, some ending up in Murdoch’s pocket.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 19 Mar 24 10.37pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The BBC would still have to be paid for, unless you want to scrap that too, when even more would need to be spent on other services, some ending up in Murdoch’s pocket.

The BBC would have to raise money itself, like other media providers.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 19 Mar 24 11.00pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don’t agree. The BBC continues to provide a very valuable service to us directly and for us indirectly.

The last thing we want to impose on them is control by the government of the day and their revenue dependant on them. They must never become, or be perceived to be, a mouthpiece of the government. Nor must they be reliant on advertising for their revenue and all the baggage that brings. They must be free of outside influences of every kind.

If those purchasing a licence continues to decline then I can see it being merged with the broadband contracts most of us have, with the licence remaining available for those without.

The value is purely subjective. I don't see the value in paying the BBC so I can watch other providers.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Mar 24 11.05pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Is that not though the result of the changes to the way programs are delivered? There’s so much more choice these days. Sky has captured cricket and most football so you no longer can watch it live for the cost of the licence. Netflix and all the other streaming services take a goodly share, alongside YouTube.

Alongside that is this. We spend much more of our time online these days than watching TV. I too watch far less and when I do it’s rarely live, but via the iPlayer.

So the BBC must adapt to its new environment or perish. I think it is trying hard to do just that.

I tend to watch live TV - just a traditionalist I guess. Don't want to bore everyone with why I'm not that interested in bingeing series' or anything like that. I kind of wonder am I relatively typical in not watching BBC that much anymore - despite watching it a lot previously? It sounds like you have your reasons not to watch it. Mine are more about the programming rather than anything else. From a personal viewpoint I'm not that interested in their content anymore. I don't watch their news either, yet used to - I find it disarmingly similar to Sky News which I also don't watch. I don't even bother much with things like Eggheads anymore, The Chase seems better. I used to love University Challenge but it's not the same without Gascoigne or Paxman. Mostly I find their changes are for the worse.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Mar 24 9.09am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

The value is purely subjective. I don't see the value in paying the BBC so I can watch other providers.

I am sure that somewhere an objective analysis of the value of the BBC to the British economy is made. A value that depends on it remaining free from outside influences and therefore that it is essential to ensure its funding model doesn’t compromise that.

You are not therefore paying the BBC to watch others. You are paying to protect the independence of a vital British asset. It’s an essential part of our identity.

How we convince the cynical is the problem.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Mar 24 9.11am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I tend to watch live TV - just a traditionalist I guess. Don't want to bore everyone with why I'm not that interested in bingeing series' or anything like that. I kind of wonder am I relatively typical in not watching BBC that much anymore - despite watching it a lot previously? It sounds like you have your reasons not to watch it. Mine are more about the programming rather than anything else. From a personal viewpoint I'm not that interested in their content anymore. I don't watch their news either, yet used to - I find it disarmingly similar to Sky News which I also don't watch. I don't even bother much with things like Eggheads anymore, The Chase seems better. I used to love University Challenge but it's not the same without Gascoigne or Paxman. Mostly I find their changes are for the worse.

It’s personal choice. And aging! Comes to us all far too quickly I’m afraid.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eaglesdare Flag 20 Mar 24 10.06am Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

[Link]

- BBC is prepared to spout mistruths without bothering to check its sources

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 20 Mar 24 10.59am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by eaglesdare

[Link]

- BBC is prepared to spout mistruths without bothering to check its sources

"Setting yourself up for a fail."

By creating a Verify unit with articles showing a green circle they run the risk of looking stupid when they get it wrong.

In the old days when the BBC cocked up they could simply trot out the usual "journalist error", or "mistakes were made lessons have been learned", "no deliberate intention to mislead" etc.

Once you had a dedicated fact checking unit though if they are found to have missed something or worse lied then this actually does more reputational damage and the excuses become even hollower.

Now where's the popcorn.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 20 Mar 24 11.32am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am sure that somewhere an objective analysis of the value of the BBC to the British economy is made. A value that depends on it remaining free from outside influences and therefore that it is essential to ensure its funding model doesn’t compromise that.

You are not therefore paying the BBC to watch others. You are paying to protect the independence of a vital British asset. It’s an essential part of our identity.

How we convince the cynical is the problem.

It's not cynical to say that most of their programming is rubbish.
This British asset argument is the same one used to justify funding the Royal Opera House.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Runningman Flag Keston 20 Mar 24 12.24pm Send a Private Message to Runningman Add Runningman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don’t think that is totally correct. Classics in their own right certainly but there was always an element of parody making political points. Making us laugh and think at the same time. Especially with the likes of Benny Hill and Alf Garnett.

It’s still there today. Have you ever seen Mrs Brown’s Boys?

Social change is always with us anyway.

Mrs Brown’s Boys !
Funny ?
Now I know you’re on a wind up.

I’d rather have piles than watch that crap.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 20 Mar 24 3.29pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am sure that somewhere an objective analysis of the value of the BBC to the British economy is made. A value that depends on it remaining free from outside influences and therefore that it is essential to ensure its funding model doesn’t compromise that.

You are not therefore paying the BBC to watch others. You are paying to protect the independence of a vital British asset. It’s an essential part of our identity.

How we convince the cynical is the problem.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 20 Mar 24 3.29pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am sure that somewhere an objective analysis of the value of the BBC to the British economy is made. A value that depends on it remaining free from outside influences and therefore that it is essential to ensure its funding model doesn’t compromise that.

You are not therefore paying the BBC to watch others. You are paying to protect the independence of a vital British asset. It’s an essential part of our identity.

How we convince the cynical is the problem.

Wrong answer, Yes, you HAVE to pay to watch others because the bbc doesn't like people not watching them.

The only cynic, is you. Blinkered, un-accepting of others point o view/belief because it doesn't align with yours.

What a sad world you must live in . . . #defundthebbc

Edited by eagleman13 (20 Mar 2024 3.33pm)

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 390 of 435 < 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)