This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
silvertop Portishead 19 Mar 24 8.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
well then i guess its not a mistake ? to film a period-drama..... and replace the whole cast with a bunch of minorities & Wokes ? With woke plots, woke storylines, and woke agenda items. Fanatics are never wrong, dont make mistakes and never apologise. Just ask the Woke Pope, Gary Linekar. Jesus how many times. They are bound by the Equality Act to fill their programmes inclusively. If you don't like it, canvas your MP.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 8.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Most of us on here think you talk tripe 'far' too often. The term 'far right' has no real meaning. It has become a buzz phrase to describe anyone who the left don't like. It conjures up images of skinheads, swastikas and nutty nationalists. It is designed to do exactly that, and it is used by people like you who have no real credible arguments. It is an excuse for loony lefty thugs to put on their little face masks and attempt to silence opposition with violence and intimidation. It is a way for the usual suspects to scare us into voting for the same old failed two party system. “Most” of you here would constitute a tiny minority out in the real world where the kind of views I hold are in the mainstream. The term “far right” means different things to different people. It depends where your own views fall on the spectrum. It certainly is not just anyone the left doesn’t like. The left don’t like the Tories. Any and all of them. They don’t much care for the Liberals either. You could not describe Jeremy Hunt, Ken Clarke or Michael Heseltine as far right but some would describe Suella Braverman and John Redmond that way. Fringe parties, of the left or the right, are never going to hold power in the UK. The best they can hope for is to be needed as part of a coalition and exert some influence as a consequence. We are by nature a moderate people, with common values and expectations.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 8.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
But not before they are threatened with a legal case though! Are you sure about that? The offending copy was provided by a news agency and slipped past the editor. When it was pointed out it got removed and the apology made. Are you sure a case was threatened, or just the request for the removal?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Mar 24 8.38pm | |
---|---|
I find I watch it less and less. They just don't have stuff I want most of the time now - which is quite funny as I like documentaries and history, even liked things like that ex MP on a train - but most of the quaint kind of stuff I like seems to have gone. Plus they barely bother with the snooker, cricket and darts. I used to love an old five day test on BBC 2. Even the proper Top Gear was watchable. But alas, that seems like yesteryear. Regardless of political bias, I rarely watch it now but used to until recently enough. Is it just my perception of does it have little for people like me now?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Houston Eagle Houston 19 Mar 24 8.43pm | |
---|---|
The days of only fools and horses, the 2 Ronnie’s, Bennie Hill etc are long gone! All considered classics in their own right but now frowned upon as racist rhetoric or politically incorrect now!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 8.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The BBC still claiming neutrality is a sick joke. It is run largely by Guardian reading types, who probably believe the utter nonsense within its pages. On the surface it tries to be all things to all people but fails to recognise that different demographics don't come in equal proportions. It fails the majority by pandering to minorities. The fact that it considers Reform to be far right just demonstrates how far to the left it has moved. The BBC doesn’t claim neutrality! It is bound by its Charter to be neutral. If you believe it is failing to observe its responsibilities then I feel sure there are ways for you to make your views known to the Board. They though are obviously satisfied that balance is being maintained and I agree, as I believe most people do. Only those on the fringes of political views, both left and right, believe the BBC is biased against them. It doesn’t believe Reform to be far right! It accepts that was a mistake and apologised.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 9.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Houston Eagle
The days of only fools and horses, the 2 Ronnie’s, Bennie Hill etc are long gone! All considered classics in their own right but now frowned upon as racist rhetoric or politically incorrect now! I don’t think that is totally correct. Classics in their own right certainly but there was always an element of parody making political points. Making us laugh and think at the same time. Especially with the likes of Benny Hill and Alf Garnett. It’s still there today. Have you ever seen Mrs Brown’s Boys? Social change is always with us anyway.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 9.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I find I watch it less and less. They just don't have stuff I want most of the time now - which is quite funny as I like documentaries and history, even liked things like that ex MP on a train - but most of the quaint kind of stuff I like seems to have gone. Plus they barely bother with the snooker, cricket and darts. I used to love an old five day test on BBC 2. Even the proper Top Gear was watchable. But alas, that seems like yesteryear. Regardless of political bias, I rarely watch it now but used to until recently enough. Is it just my perception of does it have little for people like me now? Is that not though the result of the changes to the way programs are delivered? There’s so much more choice these days. Sky has captured cricket and most football so you no longer can watch it live for the cost of the licence. Netflix and all the other streaming services take a goodly share, alongside YouTube. Alongside that is this. We spend much more of our time online these days than watching TV. I too watch far less and when I do it’s rarely live, but via the iPlayer. So the BBC must adapt to its new environment or perish. I think it is trying hard to do just that.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 19 Mar 24 9.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Is that not though the result of the changes to the way programs are delivered? There’s so much more choice these days. Sky has captured cricket and most football so you no longer can watch it live for the cost of the licence. Netflix and all the other streaming services take a goodly share, alongside YouTube. Alongside that is this. We spend much more of our time online these days than watching TV. I too watch far less and when I do it’s rarely live, but via the iPlayer. So the BBC must adapt to its new environment or perish. I think it is trying hard to do just that. All good reasons to scrap the licence fee.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Mar 24 9.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Jesus how many times. They are bound by the Equality Act to fill their programmes inclusively. If you don't like it, canvas your MP. I think they apply it a little too keenly.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Mar 24 10.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
All good reasons to scrap the licence fee. I don’t agree. The BBC continues to provide a very valuable service to us directly and for us indirectly. The last thing we want to impose on them is control by the government of the day and their revenue dependant on them. They must never become, or be perceived to be, a mouthpiece of the government. Nor must they be reliant on advertising for their revenue and all the baggage that brings. They must be free of outside influences of every kind. If those purchasing a licence continues to decline then I can see it being merged with the broadband contracts most of us have, with the licence remaining available for those without.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 19 Mar 24 10.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t agree. The BBC continues to provide a very valuable service to us directly and for us indirectly. The last thing we want to impose on them is control by the government of the day and their revenue dependant on them. They must never become, or be perceived to be, a mouthpiece of the government. Nor must they be reliant on advertising for their revenue and all the baggage that brings. They must be free of outside influences of every kind. If those purchasing a licence continues to decline then I can see it being merged with the broadband contracts most of us have, with the licence remaining available for those without. Previously, on the 'wicked-tories' thread, you asked for details of how taxes could be cut. Along with the number of ways that I listed, I should have included scrapping the TV Licence fee, which would save £3.8 billion a year.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.