You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Bridge
November 23 2024 11.45am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

London Bridge

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 34 of 61 < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 >

  

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 05 Jun 17 9.07am

Originally posted by DanH

The vast, vast majority really can. It's a tiny minority of c*nts who can't.

Look at some history.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
7mins Flag In the bush 05 Jun 17 10.02am Send a Private Message to 7mins Add 7mins as a friend

Originally posted by europalace

Imagine how peaceful Northern Ireland would have been without Christianity.

Whataboutery

What's your view on the here and now. We have a problem with Islamic terrorism. Why are people scared to admit this? Look... if something's wrong.., criticise it... but don't say "er, yea... maybe we have a tiny problem with, like a tiny proportion of Muslims, but what about the Christian Crusades in the 12th century?"

The problem is here, we gotta deal with it... ignore the far right, ignore the far left... look at the facts, if it goes against your moral compass, have the courage to speak out.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Jun 17 10.30am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by 7mins

Whataboutery

What's your view on the here and now. We have a problem with Islamic terrorism. Why are people scared to admit this? Look... if something's wrong.., criticise it... but don't say "er, yea... maybe we have a tiny problem with, like a tiny proportion of Muslims, but what about the Christian Crusades in the 12th century?"

The problem is here, we gotta deal with it... ignore the far right, ignore the far left... look at the facts, if it goes against your moral compass, have the courage to speak out.

Indeed. The fact is is that it is a specific type of religious extremist adhering to a specific type of interpretation that carries out the attacks against us and others around the world including muslims. Actually, mostly against muslims. So, going by that fact, we should be focusing on that target group and their paymasters as 100% the main threat and stop bleating on about 'Muslims' per se.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 05 Jun 17 10.36am

Originally posted by europalace

Imagine how peaceful Northern Ireland would have been without Christianity.

Not very if Irish mythology and classic literature from pre-Christian times is anything to be believed.

Celts liked a good scrap.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Jun 17 10.39am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

It's not just religion. It is race, language, history, traditions and culture. Nations came about because people of similar religion, race, language, and culture united to protect and enhance these things. Most conflicts in history, and now, largely have differences in race, religion, language and culture at their roots. To pretend that different races, religions and cultures can get along just fine is delusion, however much fools like Caroline Lucas and Tim Farron and Jeremy Corbyn tell you otherwise.

Really? And here was me thinking all this time that most conflicts were because others had something that someone else wanted. Land, resources, mineral wealth, etc, that kind of thing. But it turns out according to our resident Hol historian that they came about because others spoke a different language, ate different food and they danced funny.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
7mins Flag In the bush 05 Jun 17 10.40am Send a Private Message to 7mins Add 7mins as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

Indeed. The fact is is that it is a specific type of religious extremist adhering to a specific type of interpretation that carries out the attacks against us and others around the world including muslims. Actually, mostly against muslims. So, going by that fact, we should be focusing on that target group and their paymasters as 100% the main threat and stop bleating on about 'Muslims' per se.

Yep... if the survey of 10000 Muslims is to be believed, 4% sympathise with terrorist attacks, we need to help the majority get rid of this 4%.

We must also admit that 4% is a sizeable number

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 05 Jun 17 10.42am

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Look at some history.

It generally takes a few c**ts to get the general population going, and a bit of time. Usually its the more 'intransigent' and sidelined factions that weigh in big and have the most to gain, politically.

Take Yugoslavia and Rwanda - The rise of 'Nationalist / Tribalised Politics' and the subsequent 'extremist agenda' pushing ends up going down a path where people who have spent decades as neighbours over a period of time end up being polarised into specific factions.

Which of course is what groups like the far Left, Far Right, Islamists, terrorists are aiming to achieve - To force people to pick a side. Radical Islam isn't any different.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 05 Jun 17 10.47am

Originally posted by 7mins

Yep... if the survey of 10000 Muslims is to be believed, 4% sympathise with terrorist attacks, we need to help the majority get rid of this 4%.

We must also admit that 4% is a sizeable number

Sympathise with terrorist attacks is an issue, and it needs to be addressed, but it does depend on what you mean by sympathetic. If it means willing to break the law and provide material support to terrorism, then yes.

But 4% of Muslims being sympathetic is surprisingly small compared to the kind of sympathetic support Loyalist and Republican terrorists had during the 70s, 80s and 90s.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Jun 17 10.49am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by 7mins

Yep... if the survey of 10000 Muslims is to be believed, 4% sympathise with terrorist attacks, we need to help the majority get rid of this 4%.

We must also admit that 4% is a sizeable number

Ok, but again going by the 'facts' 99.6% of Muslims around the globe don't adhere to Wahhabism and even the ones that do not all of them interpret Wahhabism as extremely as the killers/IS/Al qaeda do.

Every single terror attack since 1993 carried out by those groups had attackers who follow ultra-extreme Wahhabism/Salafist-ism.

We know who harbours, promotes and finances them. We even know where tens of thousands of them are in a finite area of Syria and Iraq.

So, Theresa, if "enough" really is "enough", tell the population those facts and hit them where it hurts.

We are right behind you.

You will, of course, won't.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Jun 2017 10.50am)

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 05 Jun 17 10.50am Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

The tories have cut the police, army and prisons ruthlessly and they are not effective.

I blame Mrs May for the fact I cannot go anywhere safely in my area and I relate it directly to her ruthless cuts as Home Secretary.

Only a complete reversal of tory policies will help in my opinion.

You would have to be close to the ground like a police officer on his community beat to understand what is going on.


I certainly agree that more funding is now required...but it'd be interesting to see how many calling for it would then accuse her/Tories of making a U turn should it happen....

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 05 Jun 17 10.50am

Originally posted by Kermit8

Really? And here was me thinking all this time that most conflicts were because others had something that someone else wanted. Land, resources, mineral wealth, etc, that kind of thing. But it turns out according to our resident Hol historian that they came about because others spoke a different language, ate different food and they danced funny.

Wars are typically far to expensive to be about non-material issues for the most part. They do tend to be about power, status, wealth, resources and maintaining access to those.

Civil conflicts less so, to start with, but usually the ones who focus on those issues, tend to win.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
europalace Flag Europe 05 Jun 17 10.54am Send a Private Message to europalace Add europalace as a friend

Originally posted by 7mins

Whataboutery

What's your view on the here and now. We have a problem with Islamic terrorism. Why are people scared to admit this? Look... if something's wrong.., criticise it... but don't say "er, yea... maybe we have a tiny problem with, like a tiny proportion of Muslims, but what about the Christian Crusades in the 12th century?"

The problem is here, we gotta deal with it... ignore the far right, ignore the far left... look at the facts, if it goes against your moral compass, have the courage to speak out.


The way of dealing with it in the best way was to leave these people and their countries alone in the first place. Once you start to punch people about the face, they're likely to get angry and try to punch back. Much more difficult to get out of a fight once you've started it.


Edited by europalace (05 Jun 2017 10.55am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 34 of 61 < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Bridge