This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Eaglehamster Storrington 27 Jul 20 10.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BM
I really hope Roy stays and is given some decent players to work with. It’s been a good season overall and the rigour he brings to the team is important. It might not be the most exciting football but how many non-top six sides stay up AND entertain? He’s an excellent manager and if we replace him I think we are more likely to go down next season. We stayed up. Yes that's good. But we have played some of the worst football anyone can remember and ended the season getting 1 point from 24. No so good.
I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 27 Jul 20 10.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I do get the impression that large swathes of our supporters are thinking along the lines of "Oh, NO, not another season with Hodgson and his boring tactics". I am increasingly hearing "Time for a change". I,m increasingly looking toward joining all the we used to be someone’s in the Championship and lower , much earlier than we needed to be, if the moaners get their way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 27 Jul 20 10.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglehamster
We stayed up. Yes that's good. But we have played some of the worst football anyone can remember and ended the season getting 1 point from 24. No so good. We played almost everyone in top ten in our last run of games with a load of injuries and nothing to play for and no support.
Does anyone really think we can open games up and play exciting football all the time with the squad we have? Wake up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 27 Jul 20 11.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We played almost everyone in top ten in our last run of games with a load of injuries and nothing to play for and no support.
Does anyone really think we can open games up and play exciting football all the time with the squad we have? Wake up. First paragraph is spot on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 27 Jul 20 11.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Good qustions. I made a post a while ago when it is clear we were safe asking what people wanted to see from the last few games. I think it should have been a discussion between Parish and Roy and we should have had a clear stratergy either way. The options we had were; 1) Stick with our best team, and hope we finish as high up the league as possible. 2) Treat the matches as friendlys, try out some different players, see what we have to build on for next season. We stuck with our best team, lost 7 games and drew one against a Spurs side who weren't pushing for a win. Therefore, the manager got it wrong. In the matches we were losing, we failed to make uses of our substitutions to either chase the game or give the youngesters a run out. Roy's biggest concern seemed to be goal difference. He can always come in after a games with the same cliches about how the thought we were unlucky. So Roy didn't chase the highest possible league finish but still played what he thought was our best team. If we treated the games like friendlies, we could have seen what players might be able to contribute to the side next season, if a player played well, we could save or make millions in the transfer market. B But Roy decided to play our senior players, showing that there is no real competition for first team places. Your second question is pretty loaded and your language is quite devisive, and contains a typical Roy Hodgson appologist excuse. I can tell you that I wouldn't have bought on an experienced defensive midfielder for a winger with two minutes to go. I'd have like to have seen something done earlier, and with more attacking intent. We had Pierreck, Meyer, Kirby, and Gordon on the bench. We could even have bought on Woods and stuck Dann up front. Again, had we lost, we'd finish in exactly the same league position. Contiually giving players 2 mintues on the pitch in just seems like an insult to the players, unless he's trying to kill a game off. A draw with Spurs, on the last day of the season, when they only needed a draw, isn't some great acheivement to celebrate. It can't be used to hide from the fact we lost 7 in a row before then. In Roy's fans minds, it's his Dunkirk. Lombardo stuck a young Clinton Morrison on the pitch for 10 minutes against Sheffield Wednesday on the last day of the season in 1998. He grabbed a tap in and gave the fans something to be hopeful for going into the next season. Ok, so you didn't answer my first question, merely re stated your options. And how can you say that he didn't chase the highest league position although he continued to select his best team - I don't follow that train of thought. If I was a manager at any level and my team had lost 7 on the bounce, I would most certainly want to do my utmost to protect a point. Bringing on an untried youngster for 2 minutes ? - not the answer. As for your Woods / Dann suggestion, well I think you're in a minority of one if you seriously think that was a viable option.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 27 Jul 20 11.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We played almost everyone in top ten in our last run of games with a load of injuries and nothing to play for and no support.
Does anyone really think we can open games up and play exciting football all the time with the squad we have? Wake up. You're not wrong, Hrolf.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglehamster Storrington 27 Jul 20 11.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We played almost everyone in top ten in our last run of games with a load of injuries and nothing to play for and no support.
Does anyone really think we can open games up and play exciting football all the time with the squad we have? Wake up.
The fact that there has been so little investment over the last 3 years is indeed the probable reason I have at no time called for Roy's sacking but surely you'll agree with me that something has to change.
I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 27 Jul 20 11.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Ok, so you didn't answer my first question, merely re stated your options. And how can you say that he didn't chase the highest league position although he continued to select his best team - I don't follow that train of thought. If I was a manager at any level and my team had lost 7 on the bounce, I would most certainly want to do my utmost to protect a point. Bringing on an untried youngster for 2 minutes ? - not the answer. As for your Woods / Dann suggestion, well I think you're in a minority of one if you seriously think that was a viable option. I said, that you'd pick a statergy and either us youth players, or go for the points. We made a half arsed attempt to go for the points and failed because of our negative tactics. I'd prefer it if we went for a death or glory approach in the final minutes, particularly if we were safe in the knowledge that we couldn't drop a league position. You completely ignored my point about Morrison's debut. Why not give it a go? I'd give them much longer than two minutes. That's pointless unless you are trying to kill off a game. Woods/Dann may not have been the answer (although Dann did come close with the final chance of the game), but we still had Meyer, Pierreck, Kirby, and Gordon. I bet if Roy was in charge in 1998 he'd have played Padavano, although at the time he was busy screwing up Blackburn. A draw yesterday won't make a blind bit of difference to the current slump we are in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 27 Jul 20 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglehamster
The fact that there has been so little investment over the last 3 years is indeed the probable reason I have at no time called for Roy's sacking but surely you'll agree with me that something has to change.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Frickin Saweet South Cronx 27 Jul 20 12.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
The 12 month business is probably about Roy's age and whether he will feel up to it 12 months hence. I suspect SP will be happy to keep extending for 12 months whilst ever Roy feels he can continue to do the job. In other words, if it looks like we will survive next season and Roy still feels he can do the job, expect another 12 month extension agreed next Spring. So our strategy is to keep an old boy in the job for as long as the old boy feels like he can get out of bed each morning? My God I really hope things aren't as clueless as that. We're a football club not a nursing home.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 27 Jul 20 12.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
It's statements like these that don't hold water. Hodgson inherited a decent enough squad:
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 27 Jul 20 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
I said, that you'd pick a statergy and either us youth players, or go for the points. We made a half arsed attempt to go for the points and failed because of our negative tactics. I'd prefer it if we went for a death or glory approach in the final minutes, particularly if we were safe in the knowledge that we couldn't drop a league position. You completely ignored my point about Morrison's debut. Why not give it a go? I'd give them much longer than two minutes. That's pointless unless you are trying to kill off a game. Woods/Dann may not have been the answer (although Dann did come close with the final chance of the game), but we still had Meyer, Pierreck, Kirby, and Gordon. I bet if Roy was in charge in 1998 he'd have played Padavano, although at the time he was busy screwing up Blackburn. A draw yesterday won't make a blind bit of difference to the current slump we are in. And you are choosing to ignore my first question - how do you think Parish would have reacted if Hodgson had told him he wanted to '' experiment ' in the last 8 games ? You might prefer to go for '' death or glory '' but you aren't a Premier League manager. A draw DOES make a difference. A tiny step perhaps, but one in the right direction. So yes, Hodgson was trying to kill the game off and protect the point. Ask the players if they felt better at getting a point yesterday as the result of their putting a shift in or whether they wished the manager had gambled and they had lost the game. I think I can predict what the answers would be.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.