This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 12 Dec 16 3.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Head of a large organisation innit. Couldyou imagine a ceo earning the same as one of their gonks? Sure, but I thought the whole trade union movement was predicated on equality and resisting taking it anally from The Man. How much of the poor, hard done by strikers' pain is being shared by the union leadership?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 12 Dec 16 3.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Sure, but I thought the whole trade union movement was predicated on equality and resisting taking it anally from The Man. How much of the poor, hard done by strikers' pain is being shared by the union leadership? That's why I said it makes me a little uncomfortable with it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Funding facilities time actually saves loads of money. Says a union who receives funding. None of those are facts.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 12 Dec 16 4.19pm | |
---|---|
Gordon Taylor PFA head earned £3.3million last year
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 12 Dec 16 4.21pm | |
---|---|
So the research is flawed? Would you care to explain, in detail, why it is flawed?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 4.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
So the research is flawed? Would you care to explain, in detail, why it is flawed? They say they're facts, they're not. No more details required.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 12 Dec 16 4.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
They say they're facts, they're not. No more details required. 1 Source: Workplace Representatives: A review of their facilities and facility time, BERR, January 2007
But no doubt because it was commissioned by Unison you'll say it's crap. It'll be interesting to see what you pick from the research methodology that makes the findings redundant.
Edited by nickgusset (12 Dec 2016 4.36pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Only 10 a year!! 12 Dec 16 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
1 Source: Workplace Representatives: A review of their facilities and facility time, BERR, January 2007
But no doubt because it was commissioned by Unison you'll say it's crap. It'll be interesting to see what you pick from the research methodology that makes the findings redundant.
Edited by nickgusset (12 Dec 2016 4.36pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Barcelona Based Fan No longer Barcelona, now living in... 12 Dec 16 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Gtr/Southern lost their appeal! was hoping they'd be trains for our Weds game! Edited by Barcelona Based Fan (12 Dec 2016 4.45pm)
TaxiMark |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 4.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
1 Source: Workplace Representatives: A review of their facilities and facility time, BERR, January 2007
But no doubt because it was commissioned by Unison you'll say it's crap. It'll be interesting to see what you pick from the research methodology that makes the findings redundant.
Edited by nickgusset (12 Dec 2016 4.36pm) Everything you post a link to is crap. Especially when it's 10 years old (I mean, it's not like much changed in 2008 did it?) and hugely biased. You know what actually save loads of money? Not giving it away to these bunch of dickheads, who use it to screw over the public. There's more money lost in GDP from pointless strikes than they could ever claim to save.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 12 Dec 16 4.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Only 10 a year!!
I was, think I need to do a refresher. I carried out twelve or so inspections over 3 years. The inspections took around half a day with more time to wrote reports. Do you think an agency would do this for less than £250 a time
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 5.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I was, think I need to do a refresher. I carried out twelve or so inspections over 3 years. The inspections took around half a day with more time to wrote reports. Do you think an agency would do this for less than £250 a time You are or you aren't, they don't expire. Some might suggest you're making this up to suit your story... A competent advisor (with qualifications coming out of their arse) would only charge a few hundred quid per annum, and would do reports on request.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.