This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Kermit8 Hevon 26 Feb 16 11.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
My problem with leaving (I think) is that it will give carte blanche for the Tories to be even bigger cunds than they are at present - not that the EU are that brilliant for worker rights. So true. I remember back in the 90's when Portillo et al where strongly campaigning against the minimum wage. The EU lot may be too 'Guardian' and a bit lefty but they will certainly look after the masses a lot better than the right of centre gang. Leave the EU and we will soon be back to polluted rivers and £3 an hour and the Victorian world that some see, wrongly, as 'Great'.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 27 Feb 16 3.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
So true. I remember back in the 90's when Portillo et al where strongly campaigning against the minimum wage. The EU lot may be too 'Guardian' and a bit lefty but they will certainly look after the masses a lot better than the right of centre gang. Leave the EU and we will soon be back to polluted rivers and £3 an hour and the Victorian world that some see, wrongly, as 'Great'. Didn't George Osbourne increase the minimum wage at the last budget? Also, I cannot find any evidence that an EU law for minimum wage exists as not all EU countries have a minimum wage enshrined in law. It appears that countries including Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Austria rely upon collective bargaining to set wage levels. Please, prove me wrong. I am shot to pieces by jet lag, so not in my best analytical form at the moment. Edited by matt_himself (27 Feb 2016 3.42am)
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 27 Feb 16 6.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
So true. I remember back in the 90's when Portillo et al where strongly campaigning against the minimum wage. The EU lot may be too 'Guardian' and a bit lefty but they will certainly look after the masses a lot better than the right of centre gang. Leave the EU and we will soon be back to polluted rivers and £3 an hour and the Victorian world that some see, wrongly, as 'Great'. Michael, I cannot find any EU law that enforces a minimum wage. There are EU laws that enforce maternity/paternity leave, paid holiday and dispute resolution in the workplace but no EU law that appears to state what is the minimum wage. Curiously, given the status that member states either pass their own laws stating a minimum wage or enter into a collective bargaining agreement with workers bodies, it appears that the UK minimum wage is more generous than some other EU countries. It is not the top minimum wage in the EU, neither the bottom. Furthermore, there is plenty of criticism from a cursory web check on EU employment law on how the small to medium business sector feels contained, in some cases 'strangled', by EU employment law red tape and if this red tape were removed, the sector would benefit enormously and would employ more people as a result. Please, read this for yourself. After that you may wish to revise your apparent unfounded scaremongering that jobs will be lost and wages reduced as a result of Brexit.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
exitstageright London 27 Feb 16 9.42am | |
---|---|
Of course we should leave the EV. They all plot together to vote for each other and they hate us - they have never forgiven Sandie Shaw in 1967 for her prophetic winner 'Puppet on a String' that foresaw Britain's future relationship to Europe. Also, these claims that an annual song contest generates 3,000,000 jobs and 200,000 businesses does seem slightly exaggerated? Edited by exitstageright (27 Feb 2016 9.46am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 27 Feb 16 9.50am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 27 Feb 16 9.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by exitstageright
Of course we should leave the EV. They all plot together to vote for each other and they hate us - they have never forgiven Sandie Shaw in 1967 for her prophetic winner 'Puppet on a String' that foresaw Britain's future relationship to Europe. Also, these claims that an annual song contest generates 3,000,000 jobs and 200,000 businesses does seem slightly exaggerated? Edited by exitstageright (27 Feb 2016 9.46am) You underestimate perhaps the additional negative impact of Lulu warbling "Boom Bang A Bang" in 1969?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 27 Feb 16 9.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Michael, I cannot find any EU law that enforces a minimum wage. There are EU laws that enforce maternity/paternity leave, paid holiday and dispute resolution in the workplace but no EU law that appears to state what is the minimum wage. Curiously, given the status that member states either pass their own laws stating a minimum wage or enter into a collective bargaining agreement with workers bodies, it appears that the UK minimum wage is more generous than some other EU countries. It is not the top minimum wage in the EU, neither the bottom. Furthermore, there is plenty of criticism from a cursory web check on EU employment law on how the small to medium business sector feels contained, in some cases 'strangled', by EU employment law red tape and if this red tape were removed, the sector would benefit enormously and would employ more people as a result. Please, read this for yourself. After that you may wish to revise your apparent unfounded scaremongering that jobs will be lost and wages reduced as a result of Brexit. You are right. My assertion was an indirect reference leading to, in my view, the likely erosion of positive acts implemented by the social charter and the lessening of workers' rights and environmental standards under a Non EU aligned Tory government in the future. I'm talking five, ten, twenty years down the line. The minimum wage whilst not an EU directive will be too much of a hot potato to touch today anyway. Also, It has been successful. But It just wouldn't surprise me one jot if some employers were enabled again, somehow, to pay crap wages within five years - The "£3 an hour" - without the social conscience of Europe reining in the more socially irresponsible of The Conservative party. Care through osmosis if you will. But Michael Howard did say back in the nineties "two million jobs will be lost" because of the minimum wage. His judgement can be trusted on all matters economical then. What's he voting for in June again? Basically, poverty levels and social problems go up under Conservative governments. So why make matters potentially worse?Osborne is convinced that there will be a negative economic shock on Brexit. He is Chancellor. Why would he scaremonger? Would he not just say what he believed? So if he is right, even a bit, why leave? What is the point? It's lemming politics. We know where we stand in the EU. Not liked by some. They have a chance to voice that and vote in favour of that dislike. But we really don't know if we are going to be better off without the EU. Even Boris was torn and only just came down in favour of an ''out" as it stands. And the actual real life economist on these boards thinks an 'out' is a mistake. I will leave the 'out' vote for you chancers.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 27 Feb 16 9.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
I have no reason to doubt the Economist, although one could argue that it's editorial stance is towards retaining the status quo. However, what I do find amusing is the willingness for lefties like yourself to quote or support facts supplied by business or the supporters of business, in order to support an ideological stance in Europe. Just Michael does it with fake figures and unfounded scaremongering, I doubt that many, if any other situation, Oy would use the Economist to try and win a debate. It reminds me of the last weeks in football season when people will instinctively support Br*ghton or Millwall if they are playing Palace's promotion (or, occasionally) relegation rivals.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 27 Feb 16 10.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
You are right. My assertion was an indirect reference leading to, in my view, the likely erosion of positive acts implemented by the social charter and the lessening of workers' rights and environmental standards under a Non EU aligned Tory government in the future. I'm talking five, ten, twenty years down the line. The minimum wage whilst not an EU directive will be too much of a hot potato to touch today anyway. Also, It has been successful. But It just wouldn't surprise me one jot if some employers were enabled again, somehow, to pay crap wages within five years - The "£3 an hour" - without the social conscience of Europe reining in the more socially irresponsible of The Conservative party. Care through osmosis if you will. But Michael Howard did say back in the nineties "two million jobs will be lost" because of the minimum wage. His judgement can be trusted on all matters economical then. What's he voting for in June again? Basically, poverty levels and social problems go up under Conservative governments. So why make matters potentially worse?Osborne is convinced that there will be a negative economic shock on Brexit. He is Chancellor. Why would he scaremonger? Would he not just say what he believed? So if he is right, even a bit, why leave? What is the point? It's lemming politics. We know where we stand in the EU. Not liked by some. They have a chance to voice that and vote in favour of that dislike. But we really don't know if we are going to be better off without the EU. Even Boris was torn and only just came down in favour of an ''out" as it stands. And the actual real life economist on these boards thinks an 'out' is a mistake. I will leave the 'out' vote for you chancers. So faced with the facts, you are changing your stance on the EU vote from 'Brexit will mean jobs are lost, companies bankrupted and the minimum wage severely reduced, with millions living in workhouses' to 'Brexit could be bad but I w I'll not comment on the potential benefits of Brexit as this is counter to my ideologically based decision to vote to stay in the EU'?
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Feb 16 10.08am | |
---|---|
Why do people have a false view that left wingers don't support business?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 27 Feb 16 10.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
I have no reason to doubt the Economist, although one could argue that it's editorial stance is towards retaining the status quo. However, what I do find amusing is the willingness for lefties like yourself to quote or support facts supplied by business or the supporters of business, in order to support an ideological stance in Europe. Just Michael does it with fake figures and unfounded scaremongering, I doubt that many, if any other situation, Oy would use the Economist to try and win a debate. It reminds me of the last weeks in football season when people will instinctively support Br*ghton or Millwall if they are playing Palace's promotion (or, occasionally) relegation rivals. "I doubt that many, if any other situation, Oy would use the Economist to try and win a debate". You indeed appear jet lagged. Personally,I buy the Economist every week,for its non- UK coverage... Perhaps being willing to consider arguments not just coming from one's own particular political persuasion might be thought a positive rather than a negative Matthew? Try it some time Edited by legaleagle (27 Feb 2016 10.09am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
exitstageright London 27 Feb 16 10.13am | |
---|---|
Even if the scare claims of 3,000,000 jobs etc were true (but of course they are not) it would still be worth it to regain our independence. There was a huge cost in fighting World War II, but that was worth it too - should we have surrendered to reduce costs?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.