This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Jeremy Corbyn
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 matt_himself  Matataland 18 Aug 15 7.46am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Does anyone think that Labour are saying 'we can't run a leadership election without it resembling a clowns wake but you can trust us on defence, immigration and with the economy'.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 18 Aug 15 8.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
It's fair to say that they haven't covered themselves with glory.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Aug 15 9.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 18 Aug 2015 7.46am
Does anyone think that Labour are saying 'we can't run a leadership election without it resembling a clowns wake but you can trust us on defence, immigration and with the economy'. Well last time they had a leadership election they selected Ed Milliband, who resembled a well dressed, cognitively deficient with all the charisma of sociopath, who looked uncomfortable in front of a camera, so I think its fair to say that they're incapable of running a leadership election. The time before that they selected someone who arguably would have been more at home in the conservative party. Of course historically the last labour government fought, and won, more conflicts than the last three conservative governments, introduced new immigration policy and infrastructure (twice - albeit one failed) and did have the longest period of economic growth in my life time.... So maybe they're thinking the more absurd the leadership choice and selection, the better the outcome.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 18 Aug 15 9.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 18 Aug 2015 9.25am
Quote matt_himself at 18 Aug 2015 7.46am
Does anyone think that Labour are saying 'we can't run a leadership election without it resembling a clowns wake but you can trust us on defence, immigration and with the economy'. Well last time they had a leadership election they selected Ed Milliband, who resembled a well dressed, cognitively deficient with all the charisma of sociopath, who looked uncomfortable in front of a camera, so I think its fair to say that they're incapable of running a leadership election. The time before that they selected someone who arguably would have been more at home in the conservative party. Of course historically the last labour government fought, and won, more conflicts than the last three conservative governments, introduced new immigration policy and infrastructure (twice - albeit one failed) and did have the longest period of economic growth in my life time.... So maybe they're thinking the more absurd the leadership choice and selection, the better the outcome. Not sure I'm allowed to ask this, but I'll risk it. Labour introduced new immigration polciy - how can we tell? Or was the new policy just to let absolutely everyone in? Edited by leggedstruggle (18 Aug 2015 9.31am)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Aug 15 9.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 18 Aug 2015 9.30am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 18 Aug 2015 9.25am
Quote matt_himself at 18 Aug 2015 7.46am
Does anyone think that Labour are saying 'we can't run a leadership election without it resembling a clowns wake but you can trust us on defence, immigration and with the economy'. Well last time they had a leadership election they selected Ed Milliband, who resembled a well dressed, cognitively deficient with all the charisma of sociopath, who looked uncomfortable in front of a camera, so I think its fair to say that they're incapable of running a leadership election. The time before that they selected someone who arguably would have been more at home in the conservative party. Of course historically the last labour government fought, and won, more conflicts than the last three conservative governments, introduced new immigration policy and infrastructure (twice - albeit one failed) and did have the longest period of economic growth in my life time.... So maybe they're thinking the more absurd the leadership choice and selection, the better the outcome. Not sure I'm allowed to ask this, but I'll risk it. Labour introduced new immigration polciy - how can we tell? Or was the new policy just to let absolutely everyone in? Edited by leggedstruggle (18 Aug 2015 9.31am) Labour introduced detention centers and modified many of the laws regarding deportation, as well as modifying the process to make deportation easier. The only real problem was the EU policy on the Right to Work within the EU, which in reality there wasn't really much choice, as it was part of the agreement the UK was signed up to (the conservatives would have accepted it as well as the Lib Dems, especially given at the time the UK was in a boom period, and under pressure from corporate entities to provide cheap labour). I don't hold with the policy, but I think in the UK, it was inevitable whoever was in charge.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Johnny Eagles  berlin 18 Aug 15 10.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Neil Kinnock warns Labour not to make itself unelectable. In other news, Ian Brady has warned against cruelty to children and Pol Pot has been telling the Cambodian government to be nicer to its people.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 18 Aug 15 10.22am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 18 Aug 2015 10.08am
Neil Kinnock warns Labour not to make itself unelectable. In other news, Ian Brady has warned against cruelty to children and Pol Pot has been telling the Cambodian government to be nicer to its people.
Their voting supporters seem to be laser guided to the most unelectable leader of any candidates available.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 18 Aug 15 10.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote SamCPFC17 at 15 Aug 2015 7.36pm
Quote fed up eagle at 15 Aug 2015 7.17pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 15 Aug 2015 4.46pm
Quote nickgusset at 15 Aug 2015 2.29pm
Corbyn unelectable? Well he is resonating with Londoners. A few have posted on here that Corbyn would be a very unpopular choice. I'll send them the recipe for humble pie in a few months when Corbynhas proved to be a more than able opposition leader. Resonating with 'Londoners', I wonder why.
Neither, and remember it's just your opinion, like what I wrote is mine.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 18 Aug 15 10.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Mr Fenandes at 16 Aug 2015 10.18am
Quote fed up eagle at 15 Aug 2015 7.17pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 15 Aug 2015 4.46pm
Quote nickgusset at 15 Aug 2015 2.29pm
Corbyn unelectable? Well he is resonating with Londoners. A few have posted on here that Corbyn would be a very unpopular choice. I'll send them the recipe for humble pie in a few months when Corbynhas proved to be a more than able opposition leader. Resonating with 'Londoners', I wonder why.
'Liberal elite' whilst we're in a Tory government. You pair of racist numpties.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 18 Aug 15 10.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Someone who follows the term 'multi-cultural' with the the term 'hell-hole' tends to sound a bit, y'know, racist.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 18 Aug 15 10.51am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote DanH at 18 Aug 2015 10.46am
Someone who follows the term 'multi-cultural' with the the term 'hell-hole' tends to sound a bit, y'know, racist.
LOL
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 18 Aug 15 10.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 18 Aug 2015 10.51am
Quote DanH at 18 Aug 2015 10.46am
Someone who follows the term 'multi-cultural' with the the term 'hell-hole' tends to sound a bit, y'know, racist.
LOL Haha, I did notice that but thought I'd give him the benefit of doubt
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.