Where's the thread about the Belgian Machete nut?

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Where's the thread about the Belgian Machete nut?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Hrolf The Ganger 10 Aug 16 2.20pm
Originally posted by ASCPFC Fair enough; I believe everyone should be checked at the borders. Too many times I have just walked through and not seen a soul. Recently, and at regional airports even more so. The last thing we need is more religious nutcases coming here, there are way too many already. A strict profile of any person wishing to come here is needed to ascertain personality and value to our economy. No more excuses. This is the most important decision we need to make for the future of Britain. We cannot let Europe or anyone else tell us who we must allow here for any reason. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

10 Aug 16 2.20pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Fair enough; I believe everyone should be checked at the borders. Too many times I have just walked through and not seen a soul. Recently, and at regional airports even more so.

The last thing we need is more religious nutcases coming here, there are way too many already.
A strict profile of any person wishing to come here is needed to ascertain personality and value to our economy.
No more excuses. This is the most important decision we need to make for the future of Britain. We cannot let Europe or anyone else tell us who we must allow here for any reason.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 10 Aug 16 5.54pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The last thing we need is more religious nutcases coming here, there are way too many already. A strict profile of any person wishing to come here is needed to ascertain personality and value to our economy. No more excuses. This is the most important decision we need to make for the future of Britain. We cannot let Europe or anyone else tell us who we must allow here for any reason. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm) We could simply take our agreed quota by selecting all the Christian Syrians from the camps - where they are still suffering persecution at the hands of Muslims. They would definitely fit better into the ethos of this country and be less trouble..... A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 10 Aug 16 5.54pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm)

We could simply take our agreed quota by selecting all the Christian Syrians from the camps - where they are still suffering persecution at the hands of Muslims. They would definitely fit better into the ethos of this country and be less trouble.....

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Aug 16 7.02pm
Originally posted by becky We could simply take our agreed quota by selecting all the Christian Syrians from the camps - where they are still suffering persecution at the hands of Muslims. They would definitely fit better into the ethos of this country and be less trouble..... Or we could just say we have enough and get rid of any silly quota. Let Japan take more. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Aug 16 7.02pm

Originally posted by becky

Or we could just say we have enough and get rid of any silly quota. Let Japan take more.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 9.00am
Here's a thought. how about the neighbouring rich as fcuk Arab countries take some on ? Or the British Army has just left Camp Bastion one and two I'm pretty sure they could with a bit of a lick of paint and some groundwork, be brought up to speed and house thousands of immigrants. Much cheeper in the long run, safer, clean water medical facilities, proper accommodation and certainly closer. As it was a UN enclave for the Op Herrick it is easily defended (given the right staff etc etc) but still I'm sure you catch my drift. "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 9.00am

Here's a thought.

how about the neighbouring rich as fcuk Arab countries take some on ?

Or the British Army has just left Camp Bastion one and two I'm pretty sure they could with a bit of a lick of paint and some groundwork, be brought up to speed and house thousands of immigrants. Much cheeper in the long run, safer, clean water medical facilities, proper accommodation and certainly closer.

As it was a UN enclave for the Op Herrick it is easily defended (given the right staff etc etc) but still I'm sure you catch my drift.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Aug 16 9.33am
Originally posted by dannyh Here's a thought. how about the neighbouring rich as fcuk Arab countries take some on ? Because of their terrible human rights records and reputation for persecuting minority Muslim groups. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 11 Aug 16 9.33am

Originally posted by dannyh

Here's a thought.

how about the neighbouring rich as fcuk Arab countries take some on ?

Because of their terrible human rights records and reputation for persecuting minority Muslim groups.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Aug 16 9.40am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The last thing we need is more religious nutcases coming here, there are way too many already. A strict profile of any person wishing to come here is needed to ascertain personality and value to our economy. No more excuses. This is the most important decision we need to make for the future of Britain. We cannot let Europe or anyone else tell us who we must allow here for any reason. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm) Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there. We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 11 Aug 16 9.40am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2016 2.21pm)

Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there.

We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 9.59am
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there. We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries. Yes but why, How many Arab(and neighbouring) countries do you think would take in British "asylum seekers" if the roles where reversed ? "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 9.59am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there.

We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries.

Yes but why, How many Arab(and neighbouring) countries do you think would take in British "asylum seekers" if the roles where reversed ?

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 11 Aug 16 10.25am
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there. We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries. Not worried about them.It's the loons we need to avoid. Our first duty is to British citizens.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

11 Aug 16 10.25am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Syria was largely a secular country, and there are a lot of secular Muslims and progressive Muslims there.

We have to accept a responsibility for refugees and asylum, failure to do so, will just lend justification to other countries doing the same, and ultimately creating humanitarian crisis in neighbouring countries that will escalate the situation, and result in knock on effects in countries neighbouring those countries.

Not worried about them.It's the loons we need to avoid.

Our first duty is to British citizens.

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Aug 16 11.19am
Originally posted by dannyh Yes but why, How many Arab(and neighbouring) countries do you think would take in British "asylum seekers" if the roles where reversed ? Well, if we're talking about a hypothetically oppressive Britain that some how had a civil war or was dominated by a murderous regime, there is no reason to not assume that the countries you speak of wouldn't have become liberal democracies. The point of offering humanitarian aid and refuge from oppression, is that its humanitarian. It doesn't matter whether an oppressive regime would do the same from British Citizens, because the action of asylum is aimed at people, not the states creating refugees. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 11 Aug 16 11.19am

Originally posted by dannyh

Yes but why, How many Arab(and neighbouring) countries do you think would take in British "asylum seekers" if the roles where reversed ?

Well, if we're talking about a hypothetically oppressive Britain that some how had a civil war or was dominated by a murderous regime, there is no reason to not assume that the countries you speak of wouldn't have become liberal democracies.

The point of offering humanitarian aid and refuge from oppression, is that its humanitarian. It doesn't matter whether an oppressive regime would do the same from British Citizens, because the action of asylum is aimed at people, not the states creating refugees.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Aug 16 11.24am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Not worried about them.It's the loons we need to avoid. Our first duty is to British citizens. Something that no British Government seems to agree with sadly. I quite agree, we should be avoiding Islamists, extremists etc. The reality is we have a long history of offering refugee to those kinds of people through the 90s because it suits our foreign ambition in the middle east (effectively the UK was supporting and offering safe haven to all manner of individuals who were representative of Islamist movements in the middle east - as we saw them as an option for the future of that region). That's why we offered certain people we couldn't deport, refugee status in the first place. We wanted Jordan 'overthrown' for example. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 11 Aug 16 11.24am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Not worried about them.It's the loons we need to avoid.

Our first duty is to British citizens.

Something that no British Government seems to agree with sadly. I quite agree, we should be avoiding Islamists, extremists etc. The reality is we have a long history of offering refugee to those kinds of people through the 90s because it suits our foreign ambition in the middle east (effectively the UK was supporting and offering safe haven to all manner of individuals who were representative of Islamist movements in the middle east - as we saw them as an option for the future of that region).

That's why we offered certain people we couldn't deport, refugee status in the first place. We wanted Jordan 'overthrown' for example.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 12.00pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Well, if we're talking about a hypothetically oppressive Britain that some how had a civil war or was dominated by a murderous regime, there is no reason to not assume that the countries you speak of wouldn't have become liberal democracies. The point of offering humanitarian aid and refuge from oppression, is that its humanitarian. It doesn't matter whether an oppressive regime would do the same from British Citizens, because the action of asylum is aimed at people, not the states creating refugees. In my scenario no where does it state the Arab world have suddenly become humanist liberals. That my dear old friend was avoidance in all its wonderful (if not a little obvious) glory. "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 11 Aug 16 12.00pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

In my scenario no where does it state the Arab world have suddenly become humanist liberals. That my dear old friend was avoidance in all its wonderful (if not a little obvious) glory.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 11 Aug 16 12.04pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Something that no British Government seems to agree with sadly. I quite agree, we should be avoiding Islamists, extremists etc. The reality is we have a long history of offering refugee to those kinds of people through the 90s because it suits our foreign ambition in the middle east (effectively the UK was supporting and offering safe haven to all manner of individuals who were representative of Islamist movements in the middle east - as we saw them as an option for the future of that region). That's why we offered certain people we couldn't deport, refugee status in the first place. We wanted Jordan 'overthrown' for example. Sadly, I believe that to be highly likely. We are being used as pawns in the game. A certain amount of collateral damage can be excused away.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

11 Aug 16 12.04pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

That's why we offered certain people we couldn't deport, refugee status in the first place. We wanted Jordan 'overthrown' for example.

Sadly, I believe that to be highly likely.

We are being used as pawns in the game. A certain amount of collateral damage can be excused away.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Where's the thread about the Belgian Machete nut?

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors