You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Pair of sick bastids
November 23 2024 12.21pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Pair of sick bastids

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Apr 16 1.35pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

I signed it.... over 400,000 people have now signed that petition.

How can a judge or magistrate seriously believe a 21 weeks suspended prison sentence is a just and appropriate outcome for what they did?

400,000 people who are wrong. It is the responsibility of the Judge and justice system to determine sentences, not politicians - Demanding such based on single emotive cases, undermines the concept of a fair and impartial trial. A judge cannot sentence based on what the 'mob' feel, but on the evidence presented in court in a case.

Politicians are not impartial to public opinion, Judges must be, if we are to have a free and fair justice system. Even if that means we don't agree with the verdict.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 04 Apr 16 2.08pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

400,000 people who are wrong. It is the responsibility of the Judge and justice system to determine sentences, not politicians - Demanding such based on single emotive cases, undermines the concept of a fair and impartial trial. A judge cannot sentence based on what the 'mob' feel, but on the evidence presented in court in a case.

Politicians are not impartial to public opinion, Judges must be, if we are to have a free and fair justice system. Even if that means we don't agree with the verdict.

Unless it's a celebrity paedo?

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Apr 16 4.26pm

Originally posted by Stuk

Unless it's a celebrity paedo?

We'll we are British, so celebrities are raised up so that the media can throw them back down into the mud.

Apparently the Solicitor General can request that a sentence be reviewed by the court of appeal. They're an MP. So I guess, it should be him, rather than the Prime Minister that the petition should be aimed at.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 04 Apr 16 4.39pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

We'll we are British, so celebrities are raised up so that the media can throw them back down into the mud.

Apparently the Solicitor General can request that a sentence be reviewed by the court of appeal. They're an MP. So I guess, it should be him, rather than the Prime Minister that the petition should be aimed at.

I believe anyone can appeal that a sentence is not sufficient.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Apr 16 4.48pm

Originally posted by Stuk

I believe anyone can appeal that a sentence is not sufficient.

Then maybe those 400,000 people should be actually appealing rather than demanding that someone does it on their behalf.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 04 Apr 16 5.09pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

400,000 people who are wrong. It is the responsibility of the Judge and justice system to determine sentences, not politicians - Demanding such based on single emotive cases, undermines the concept of a fair and impartial trial. A judge cannot sentence based on what the 'mob' feel, but on the evidence presented in court in a case.

Politicians are not impartial to public opinion, Judges must be, if we are to have a free and fair justice system. Even if that means we don't agree with the verdict.

Sometimes you really get my goat with your insistence on telling us all the benefit of your "wisdom" in a high handed fashion.

Is there not one subject or situation that you aren't the world's leading authority on it?

Anyway.... 400,000+ and I suspect many millions more like-minded people up and down the country who think these two odious excuses for human beings deserve a proper sentence to merit the scale of suffering they inflicted on a defenceless animal does not constitute a "mob".

Judges have been known to be wrong with their sentencing and pressure can be brought to bear from the public and the government to make them reconsider their decisions.

The Judge in this case has fallen woefully short of proper justice in this episode according to public opinion.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Apr 16 5.17pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Sometimes you really get my goat with your insistence on telling us all the benefit of your "wisdom" in a high handed fashion.

Is there not one subject or situation that you aren't the world's leading authority on it?

Anyway.... 400,000+ and I suspect many millions more like-minded people up and down the country who think these two odious excuses for human beings deserve a proper sentence to merit the scale of suffering they inflicted on a defenceless animal does not constitute a "mob".

Judges have been known to be wrong with their sentencing and pressure can be brought to bear from the public and the government to make them reconsider their decisions.

The Judge in this case has fallen woefully short of proper justice in this episode according to public opinion.

Always confuses me as to why some seem more concerned about animal welfare than the deaths of innocents escaping persecution or people being bombed in the name of their government.
That's not to say what these chaps did was horrible.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Apr 16 5.22pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Always confuses me as to why some seem more concerned about animal welfare than the deaths of innocents escaping persecution or people being bombed in the name of their government.
That's not to say what these chaps did was horrible.

Well obviously its a sliding scale.

White British Men
White British Women
Pets
Indian People
Ethnic British people who aren't of Indian heritage
Foreigners who are mostly white and speak english
Dole claimants
Criminals
Foreigner's who don't speak English
Sex offenders
Paedophiles
The poor
Asylum Seekers.

I'm not sure where children fit on the scale, because if they're victims their saintly, but if they're criminal they're demons.

Edited by jamiemartin721 (04 Apr 2016 5.23pm)

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 04 Apr 16 5.23pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Always confuses me as to why some seem more concerned about animal welfare than the deaths of innocents escaping persecution or people being bombed in the name of their government.
That's not to say what these chaps did was horrible.

Always confuses me why you bring up a totally irrelevant point.

This thread is about animals, not migration or war.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Apr 16 11.10pm

Originally posted by Stuk

Always confuses me why you bring up a totally irrelevant point.

This thread is about animals, not migration or war.

Erm, read my post again.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derby eagle Flag Derby 05 Apr 16 12.28am Send a Private Message to derby eagle Add derby eagle as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Erm, read my post again.

So why does it confuse you? I'm also confused!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Canterbury Palace Flag Whitstable 05 Apr 16 1.53am Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace Add Canterbury Palace as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Always confuses me as to why some seem more concerned about animal welfare than the deaths of innocents escaping persecution or people being bombed in the name of their government.
That's not to say what these chaps did was horrible.

I am confused by this innate arrogance in the assumption that our lives are somehow more valuable than that of animals. Why?

I've never received anything but love from the dogs that I've owned. Humans, on the other hand, are complete arseholes. A notion furthered by the three examples within your post.

Edited by Canterbury Palace (05 Apr 2016 1.55am)

 


We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Pair of sick bastids