You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Crispin Blunt campaigns for 'poppers' to be legal
November 23 2024 5.03pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Crispin Blunt campaigns for 'poppers' to be legal

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

  

matt_himself Flag Matataland 21 Jan 16 8.34pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote on me shed son at 21 Jan 2016 8.11pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

Quote on me shed son at 21 Jan 2016 6.24pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 Jan 2016 3.53pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 Jan 2016 1.57pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am

Keep drugs illegal.

The fact is that all drugs are damaging to the individual and society. Drugs break up families, destroy individuals and cause communities to dissolve.

I'm not sure that's necessarily true in a literal sense. Drugs themselves don't break up families, people in families do that all the time. I think it becomes a convenience to blame the drug rather than the person, because it permits us to abscond responsibility to individuals we care for. Certainly addiction destroys families and kills individuals, but the problem of addiction is only representative of a few of the banned drugs. In terms of communities, the illegality is probably more damaging - notably the crime caused by gangs financed by drug money, and crime committed to obtain money for drugs. Its notable that primarily in terms of community the problem is heroin and cocaine both rather expensive drugs (who's price is massively inflated by the black market).

By criminalising drugs I would argue that greater pressures are put on families, individuals and communities than the drugs themselves. Prison and fines put a greater stress on families, the high expense of the black market and the risk in terms of quality are more threatening to individuals, than the drug itself and communities suffer more because of the social impacts of a very lucrative black market than the cost of treating addicts.

Also people who have been caught up in the criminal justice approach, find themselves having to deal with criminal records and the impact on employment as well as losing jobs and income.

Attempts to deal with the problems of alcohol via prohibition, created a greater social problem than alcohol and addiction; which affected people who didn't have a problem.

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am

I am sure that proponent's of drug liberalisation can provide many studies that 'prove' that drugs are more harmful illegal than legal but I just do not buy it.

They aren't, there are just less impacts and risks. Heroin as a drug is more or less as harmful if produced legally or illegally. The difference is that legally its easier for the user to control the risks and reduce the costs very significantly (Heroin is sold at profit to the NHS for 1/35th the price of its street equivalent.

Its also especially for those not involved. A very significant number of people who have no interest in drugs and don't even know someone with a drug problem, experience robbery, muggings, burglary, theft etc by addicts seeking to fund their addiction to crack and heroin (Finding 80-200 a day, means committing generally 240-600 a day in crime).

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am
The amount of people I have personally seen had their lives f***ed up through drugs and wish they had never come into contact with them is enough for me.

Me too, but I also grew up in an AA family, and saw those same kinds of stories from alcoholics as well - Its a problem. Banning the drugs in question hasn't helped any of those people either - And plenty of people have their lives f**ked up by the criminal justice factor, receiving criminal records because they like to get stoned rather than drunk, even in some cases spending time in prison.


I completely disagree with you.

I think your view is slanted by your politics and not the reality of drug abuse or the experience of those affected by drugs.

Not so much my politics, but my experience with drugs and rehab.


I'm with Jamie. It would be the single biggest blow you can deal to organised crime, and the current "war on drugs" doesn't seem to be having much of an impact. Plus you can argue that maybe the government doesn't have any business telling people what they can put into their bodies.


It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.

Fair enough, but are our current laws actually preventing anyone from taking drugs? I'm not sure there are many people who are not taking drugs for the only reason that they are illegal.


I agree with you. The presence of illegality does not stop consumption but should we be encouraging consumption of drugs?

The difference between the situation and legislation of drugs is what happens.

The social ramifications would be huge, in my opinion and I do not believe we have the social infrastructure to cope with a new batch of 500,000 crackheads in his country.

This is unrelated but look at how well Germany is 'integrating' an untold number of immigrants into its society, think what an untold number of people who had just discovered crack would do to Britain.

There is not to mention the suffering of souls who will no doubt be sold drugs much the same as Energy drinks are sold at the moment. Is that what we really want in this country?

I am a firm believer in no. Anything else doesn't make sense to me.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
stuckinbristol Flag In the woodwork. 22 Jan 16 9.21am Send a Private Message to stuckinbristol Add stuckinbristol as a friend

Quote We are goin up! at 21 Jan 2016 8.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.


I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure that because it was legal every Tom, Dick and Harry would suddenly be on crack. It would be heavily regulated, license needed etc. You'd feel the same if someone that was really drunk did the same thing, surely? Because that happens, too.

My personal view is that it's ridiculous that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Cocaine not sure, heroine should be illegal because it really is extraordinarily damaging and also probably doesn't fund anything like the criminality (I may be completely wrong here) that more widespread drugs do.


Really? LSD is the most unpredictable drug I have ever taken/had experience of. A good friend of mine at school, one of the most intelligent people I have known, with a good family life, got massively into LSD when we were young. he's now living what can only be described as a down and outs life. I see him from time to time and buy him something to eat. Not sure he knew who I was last time. Really sad.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 22 Jan 16 9.25am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

A big part of the reason that I tried stuff in the first place when I was youngster was because of the taboo of it all. If you knock that down by taking away the illegality and instead educate and inform about the effects then I can't see drug use massively rising if they were made legal.

Just the same as just because everyone over the age of 18 can walk into a pub and buy a pint doesn't mean that the economy has grown to a halt other than those companies making park benches and industrial strength cider.

Edited by DanH (22 Jan 2016 10.28am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jan 16 9.48am

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 9.21am

Quote We are goin up! at 21 Jan 2016 8.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.


I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure that because it was legal every Tom, Dick and Harry would suddenly be on crack. It would be heavily regulated, license needed etc. You'd feel the same if someone that was really drunk did the same thing, surely? Because that happens, too.

My personal view is that it's ridiculous that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Cocaine not sure, heroine should be illegal because it really is extraordinarily damaging and also probably doesn't fund anything like the criminality (I may be completely wrong here) that more widespread drugs do.


Really? LSD is the most unpredictable drug I have ever taken/had experience of. A good friend of mine at school, one of the most intelligent people I have known, with a good family life, got massively into LSD when we were young. he's now living what can only be described as a down and outs life. I see him from time to time and buy him something to eat. Not sure he knew who I was last time. Really sad.

That's a tragic story, and I have a friend who ended up in a similar way (not specifically from LSD by drug use either played a role or accelerated his psychosis). Although it often seems like the drug is the cause, its generally considered to be a accelerating factor in the development of problems like schizophrenia and mental illness.

Drug use, according to psychiatry and psychology is more of a symptom of mental illness, than a causal factor. If it was a causal factor, then the expectation would be a rise in psychosis in the general population, which isn't the case. What usually is the case is that people associate the drug use with the psychosis, but tend to forget that psychosis and mental health problems can affect anyone. Often what you tend to see in mental health problems is people use drugs because they have problems developing.

Thing is, by legalisation of drug use, money could be redirected from revenue raised and police savings, towards providing treatment for addiction and drug problems, rather than the current approach which generally abandons people.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jan 16 9.56am

Quote DanH at 22 Jan 2016 9.25am

A big part of he reason that I tried stuff in the first place when I was youngster was because of the taboo of it all. If you knock that down by taking away the illegality and instead educate and inform about the effects then I can't see drug use massively rising if they were made legal.

Just the same as just because everyone over the age of 18 can walk into a pub and buy a pint doesn't mean that the economy has grown to a halt other than those companies making park benches and industrial strength cider.

Quite, its important to remember that something like 1-2% of drug use is attributed to heroin addiction. The problem cases, like with booze, are the minority. Everyone knows people who have slipped into this path, but they also know people who are alcoholics. Difference tends to be that we treat alcoholics as sick, and don't force them to find 80-200 quid a day to keep their addiction going.

Also its true that people who go into the same pub and order a pint, is very very unlikely they'll end up on a bench drinking cider all day long.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
stuckinbristol Flag In the woodwork. 22 Jan 16 10.17am Send a Private Message to stuckinbristol Add stuckinbristol as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Jan 2016 9.48am

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 9.21am

Quote We are goin up! at 21 Jan 2016 8.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.


I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure that because it was legal every Tom, Dick and Harry would suddenly be on crack. It would be heavily regulated, license needed etc. You'd feel the same if someone that was really drunk did the same thing, surely? Because that happens, too.

My personal view is that it's ridiculous that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Cocaine not sure, heroine should be illegal because it really is extraordinarily damaging and also probably doesn't fund anything like the criminality (I may be completely wrong here) that more widespread drugs do.


Really? LSD is the most unpredictable drug I have ever taken/had experience of. A good friend of mine at school, one of the most intelligent people I have known, with a good family life, got massively into LSD when we were young. he's now living what can only be described as a down and outs life. I see him from time to time and buy him something to eat. Not sure he knew who I was last time. Really sad.

That's a tragic story, and I have a friend who ended up in a similar way (not specifically from LSD by drug use either played a role or accelerated his psychosis). Although it often seems like the drug is the cause, its generally considered to be a accelerating factor in the development of problems like schizophrenia and mental illness.

Drug use, according to psychiatry and psychology is more of a symptom of mental illness, than a causal factor. If it was a causal factor, then the expectation would be a rise in psychosis in the general population, which isn't the case. What usually is the case is that people associate the drug use with the psychosis, but tend to forget that psychosis and mental health problems can affect anyone. Often what you tend to see in mental health problems is people use drugs because they have problems developing.

Thing is, by legalisation of drug use, money could be redirected from revenue raised and police savings, towards providing treatment for addiction and drug problems, rather than the current approach which generally abandons people.



Sorry, went off on a bit of a tangent with my post. What I was trying to say is that LSD is a crazy drug. Anyone who has taken it will tell stories of being totally out of control. Having said that it is still my favourite drug experience (although not for many years now)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jan 16 10.46am

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 10.17am

Sorry, went off on a bit of a tangent with my post. What I was trying to say is that LSD is a crazy drug. Anyone who has taken it will tell stories of being totally out of control. Having said that it is still my favourite drug experience (although not for many years now)

Quite a fan of myself. I love psychedelics like Shrooms and LSD, always have done. Although I've never really been totally out of control on them either, they seem to always have appealed to my mind set and psychology. Now amphetamines, different story massive problem drug for me....


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
stuckinbristol Flag In the woodwork. 22 Jan 16 11.22am Send a Private Message to stuckinbristol Add stuckinbristol as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Jan 2016 10.46am

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 10.17am

Sorry, went off on a bit of a tangent with my post. What I was trying to say is that LSD is a crazy drug. Anyone who has taken it will tell stories of being totally out of control. Having said that it is still my favourite drug experience (although not for many years now)

Quite a fan of myself. I love psychedelics like Shrooms and LSD, always have done. Although I've never really been totally out of control on them either, they seem to always have appealed to my mind set and psychology. Now amphetamines, different story massive problem drug for me....



Yep, wouldn't say a problem for me (probably was, but ain't gonna admit it!)was an ever present drug during my 20's.
Have been drug free for over 5 years now. Was sort of "encouraged" by my girlfriend who's partner killed himself due to bipolar condition not helped by a large weed consumption.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 22 Jan 16 3.27pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 9.21am

Quote We are goin up! at 21 Jan 2016 8.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.


I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure that because it was legal every Tom, Dick and Harry would suddenly be on crack. It would be heavily regulated, license needed etc. You'd feel the same if someone that was really drunk did the same thing, surely? Because that happens, too.

My personal view is that it's ridiculous that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Cocaine not sure, heroine should be illegal because it really is extraordinarily damaging and also probably doesn't fund anything like the criminality (I may be completely wrong here) that more widespread drugs do.


Really? LSD is the most unpredictable drug I have ever taken/had experience of. A good friend of mine at school, one of the most intelligent people I have known, with a good family life, got massively into LSD when we were young. he's now living what can only be described as a down and outs life. I see him from time to time and buy him something to eat. Not sure he knew who I was last time. Really sad.

I agree. I think LSD is a very dangerous drug, as is 'harmless' skunk.

It f***s people up, hence I am against legislation.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Frickin Saweet Flag South Cronx 22 Jan 16 4.29pm Send a Private Message to Frickin Saweet Add Frickin Saweet as a friend

Quote on me shed son at 21 Jan 2016 6.24pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 Jan 2016 3.53pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 Jan 2016 1.57pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am

Keep drugs illegal.

The fact is that all drugs are damaging to the individual and society. Drugs break up families, destroy individuals and cause communities to dissolve.

I'm not sure that's necessarily true in a literal sense. Drugs themselves don't break up families, people in families do that all the time. I think it becomes a convenience to blame the drug rather than the person, because it permits us to abscond responsibility to individuals we care for. Certainly addiction destroys families and kills individuals, but the problem of addiction is only representative of a few of the banned drugs. In terms of communities, the illegality is probably more damaging - notably the crime caused by gangs financed by drug money, and crime committed to obtain money for drugs. Its notable that primarily in terms of community the problem is heroin and cocaine both rather expensive drugs (who's price is massively inflated by the black market).

By criminalising drugs I would argue that greater pressures are put on families, individuals and communities than the drugs themselves. Prison and fines put a greater stress on families, the high expense of the black market and the risk in terms of quality are more threatening to individuals, than the drug itself and communities suffer more because of the social impacts of a very lucrative black market than the cost of treating addicts.

Also people who have been caught up in the criminal justice approach, find themselves having to deal with criminal records and the impact on employment as well as losing jobs and income.

Attempts to deal with the problems of alcohol via prohibition, created a greater social problem than alcohol and addiction; which affected people who didn't have a problem.

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am

I am sure that proponent's of drug liberalisation can provide many studies that 'prove' that drugs are more harmful illegal than legal but I just do not buy it.

They aren't, there are just less impacts and risks. Heroin as a drug is more or less as harmful if produced legally or illegally. The difference is that legally its easier for the user to control the risks and reduce the costs very significantly (Heroin is sold at profit to the NHS for 1/35th the price of its street equivalent.

Its also especially for those not involved. A very significant number of people who have no interest in drugs and don't even know someone with a drug problem, experience robbery, muggings, burglary, theft etc by addicts seeking to fund their addiction to crack and heroin (Finding 80-200 a day, means committing generally 240-600 a day in crime).

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 10.53am
The amount of people I have personally seen had their lives f***ed up through drugs and wish they had never come into contact with them is enough for me.

Me too, but I also grew up in an AA family, and saw those same kinds of stories from alcoholics as well - Its a problem. Banning the drugs in question hasn't helped any of those people either - And plenty of people have their lives f**ked up by the criminal justice factor, receiving criminal records because they like to get stoned rather than drunk, even in some cases spending time in prison.


I completely disagree with you.

I think your view is slanted by your politics and not the reality of drug abuse or the experience of those affected by drugs.

Not so much my politics, but my experience with drugs and rehab.


I'm with Jamie. It would be the single biggest blow you can deal to organised crime, and the current "war on drugs" doesn't seem to be having much of an impact. Plus you can argue that maybe the government doesn't have any business telling people what they can put into their bodies.

It would do wonders for the street quality of cocaine too, which has hit rock bottom in recent years, assuming the Government sold a decent grade, I'm talking 8/10 at least.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 22 Jan 16 4.56pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Shouldn't he be a bit more concerned with L&G moving out of his constituency than this.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 25 Jan 16 11.35am

Quote matt_himself at 22 Jan 2016 3.27pm

Quote stuckinbristol at 22 Jan 2016 9.21am

Quote We are goin up! at 21 Jan 2016 8.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 21 Jan 2016 8.06pm

It is your right to decide how you think. That is one of the things that is great about this country.

However, I would disagree with you because if I agreed with legalising drugs and then, as a result, one of the new legion of crackheads raped and killed a or members of my family following them 'mainlining some s***', I would feel pretty s***.

Drugs use is unpredictable hence it is illegal. I wouldn't mess with that.


I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure that because it was legal every Tom, Dick and Harry would suddenly be on crack. It would be heavily regulated, license needed etc. You'd feel the same if someone that was really drunk did the same thing, surely? Because that happens, too.

My personal view is that it's ridiculous that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Cocaine not sure, heroine should be illegal because it really is extraordinarily damaging and also probably doesn't fund anything like the criminality (I may be completely wrong here) that more widespread drugs do.


Really? LSD is the most unpredictable drug I have ever taken/had experience of. A good friend of mine at school, one of the most intelligent people I have known, with a good family life, got massively into LSD when we were young. he's now living what can only be described as a down and outs life. I see him from time to time and buy him something to eat. Not sure he knew who I was last time. Really sad.

I agree. I think LSD is a very dangerous drug, as is 'harmless' skunk.

It f***s people up, hence I am against legislation.

Very dangerous, probably not, but its not without danger obviously. The question I would posit is how dangerous compared with other substances of abuse, such as alcohol. Dangers of psychedelics are real, but compared to alcohol they're fairly mimimal and correlational rather than causal. Similarly skunk isn't harmless, but relatively comparable to alcohol.

Phsyically LSD is well documented as being one of the least toxic and harmful drugs known to man. Risks are generally associated with mental health correlation - but these are tricky, given that LSD and similar drugs haven't increased psychosis in society in general. These drugs don't cause mental illness, which can affect anyone, but their use correlates to mental illness and are seen as being an accelerator of disorder, rather than the cause.

Of course a factor that has to be taken into consideration is whether these drugs are used with alcohol. In my experience, they aren't, and this factor is often unconsidered. The impact of alcohol use and abuse on say police resources is monumental esp in relation to violence (a phenomena that you don't see with cannabis use, ecstasy or LSD use).

The problem also is that illegal drugs don't decrease the dangers of use, they increase them.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Crispin Blunt campaigns for 'poppers' to be legal