Austerity Works

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Austerity Works

Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Hoof Hearted 17 Dec 15 11.54am
Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. He's probably still more of an economics guru than Brown or Balls though.... LOL
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 17 Dec 15 11.54am

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment.

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

He's probably still more of an economics guru than Brown or Balls though.... LOL

Alert a moderator to this post

thebob Tatebayashi (from Croydon) 17 Dec 15 12.12pm
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 16 Dec 2015 4.38pm Quote aquickgame2 at 16 Dec 2015 1.18pm Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Dec 2015 12.22pm Quote Cucking Funt at 16 Dec 2015 11.57am Quote DanH at 16 Dec 2015 10.29am Given that 7 years ago we entered the biggest clusterf*ck of a recession since the war and we're still not fully recovered now I'd hardly say that's that remarkable or anything to do with austerity. The recession in the 70s was far worse. ... and we had to look at 'Olive' from 'On The Buses' We had it tough! And Mildred in George and Mildrid..not good days Then again, we did have.. Felicity Kendal!! And Sally James!
Alert a moderator to this post

thebob

Tatebayashi (from Croydon) 17 Dec 15 12.12pm

Quote Tom-the-eagle at 16 Dec 2015 4.38pm

Quote aquickgame2 at 16 Dec 2015 1.18pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Dec 2015 12.22pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 16 Dec 2015 11.57am

Quote DanH at 16 Dec 2015 10.29am

Given that 7 years ago we entered the biggest clusterf*ck of a recession since the war and we're still not fully recovered now I'd hardly say that's that remarkable or anything to do with austerity.

The recession in the 70s was far worse.

... and we had to look at 'Olive' from 'On The Buses'

We had it tough!

And Mildred in George and Mildrid..not good days

Then again, we did have.. Felicity Kendal!!

And Sally James!

Alert a moderator to this post

Catfish Burgess Hill 17 Dec 15 12.15pm
Quote thebob at 17 Dec 2015 12.12pm Quote Tom-the-eagle at 16 Dec 2015 4.38pm Quote aquickgame2 at 16 Dec 2015 1.18pm Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Dec 2015 12.22pm Quote Cucking Funt at 16 Dec 2015 11.57am Quote DanH at 16 Dec 2015 10.29am Given that 7 years ago we entered the biggest clusterf*ck of a recession since the war and we're still not fully recovered now I'd hardly say that's that remarkable or anything to do with austerity. The recession in the 70s was far worse. ... and we had to look at 'Olive' from 'On The Buses' We had it tough! And Mildred in George and Mildrid..not good days Then again, we did have.. Felicity Kendal!! And Sally James! And the blond bird on Magpie! Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial
Alert a moderator to this post

Catfish

Burgess Hill 17 Dec 15 12.15pm

Quote thebob at 17 Dec 2015 12.12pm

Quote Tom-the-eagle at 16 Dec 2015 4.38pm

Quote aquickgame2 at 16 Dec 2015 1.18pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Dec 2015 12.22pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 16 Dec 2015 11.57am

Quote DanH at 16 Dec 2015 10.29am

Given that 7 years ago we entered the biggest clusterf*ck of a recession since the war and we're still not fully recovered now I'd hardly say that's that remarkable or anything to do with austerity.

The recession in the 70s was far worse.

... and we had to look at 'Olive' from 'On The Buses'

We had it tough!

And Mildred in George and Mildrid..not good days

Then again, we did have.. Felicity Kendal!!

And Sally James!

And the blond bird on Magpie!

Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial

Alert a moderator to this post

Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 17 Dec 15 12.55pm
Quote We are goin up! at 17 Dec 2015 11.09am Food bank use has rocketed because those nasty Tories changed legislation to allow job centres to direct people to them. It's also something to be proud of that we as a country provide charity like this off our own backs, rather than expecting the state to be the source of charity instead. So, when a jobless person (and by extension, families without income from work) report to a Job Centre, it's fantastic that we recognise their plight BY DIRECTING THEM TO SOMEWHERE THEY CAN GET FREE FOOD DONATED BY OTHER MEMEBRS OF THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T ACTUALLY GIVE A F@CK ABOUT THEM. Shouting is 100% deliberate. Unf@cking believable.... Why don't we take the logical next step and bring back workhouses, so the poor souls can get shelter and food whilst turning out widgets for whatever corporate sponsor we can line up? Edited by Mr_Gristle (17 Dec 2015 12.57pm) Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)
Alert a moderator to this post

Mr_Gristle

In the land of Whelk Eaters 17 Dec 15 12.55pm

Quote We are goin up! at 17 Dec 2015 11.09am

Food bank use has rocketed because those nasty Tories changed legislation to allow job centres to direct people to them. It's also something to be proud of that we as a country provide charity like this off our own backs, rather than expecting the state to be the source of charity instead.

So, when a jobless person (and by extension, families without income from work) report to a Job Centre, it's fantastic that we recognise their plight BY DIRECTING THEM TO SOMEWHERE THEY CAN GET FREE FOOD DONATED BY OTHER MEMEBRS OF THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T ACTUALLY GIVE A F@CK ABOUT THEM.

Shouting is 100% deliberate. Unf@cking believable....

Why don't we take the logical next step and bring back workhouses, so the poor souls can get shelter and food whilst turning out widgets for whatever corporate sponsor we can line up?

Edited by Mr_Gristle (17 Dec 2015 12.57pm)

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol 17 Dec 15 2.31pm
Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah
Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol

17 Dec 15 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 3.04pm
Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk Top half 17 Dec 15 3.10pm
Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk

Top half 17 Dec 15 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Optimistic as ever

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 3.30pm
Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Oh that's all right then.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 3.30pm

Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Oh that's all right then.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 17 Dec 15 4.10pm
Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Oh that's all right then. They would be able to live in their own homes nick, but any spare housing is all rented out to EU citizens exercising their rights to live/work any where in the EU and of course asylum seekers/refugees/economic migrants from the middle east... not to mention hordes of illegal immigrants living here too. But of course that is there right to live here in the UK and we must welcome them with open arms according to lefty/liberal supporters. To try and cope with demand we end up building houses on flood plains and then you lot blame the flood on governmental incompetence and global warming!
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 17 Dec 15 4.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm

Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Oh that's all right then.

They would be able to live in their own homes nick, but any spare housing is all rented out to EU citizens exercising their rights to live/work any where in the EU and of course asylum seekers/refugees/economic migrants from the middle east... not to mention hordes of illegal immigrants living here too.

But of course that is there right to live here in the UK and we must welcome them with open arms according to lefty/liberal supporters. To try and cope with demand we end up building houses on flood plains and then you lot blame the flood on governmental incompetence and global warming!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk Top half 17 Dec 15 4.28pm
Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Oh that's all right then. Yeah it is. The number of households living in temporary accommodation is still significantly lower now than the peak in 2005 Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk

Top half 17 Dec 15 4.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm

Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Oh that's all right then.

Yeah it is.

The number of households living in temporary accommodation is still significantly lower now than the peak in 2005

Optimistic as ever

Alert a moderator to this post

NickRobinson 17 Dec 15 5.52pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Dec 2015 4.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Oh that's all right then. They would be able to live in their own homes nick, but any spare housing is all rented out to EU citizens exercising their rights to live/work any where in the EU and of course asylum seekers/refugees/economic migrants from the middle east... not to mention hordes of illegal immigrants living here too. But of course that is there right to live here in the UK and we must welcome them with open arms according to lefty/liberal supporters. To try and cope with demand we end up building houses on flood plains and then you lot blame the flood on governmental incompetence and global warming! Well Hoof, apparently all this immigration is an unmitigated benefit to the country. In fact it is so good for us that I'm sure the likes of Gussett will be calling for far more immigration so that we can treated to even more blessings. Compulsory billeting on the wicked people that aren't considered victims of austerity presumably.
Alert a moderator to this post

NickRobinson

17 Dec 15 5.52pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Dec 2015 4.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm

Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Oh that's all right then.

Well Hoof, apparently all this immigration is an unmitigated benefit to the country. In fact it is so good for us that I'm sure the likes of Gussett will be calling for far more immigration so that we can treated to even more blessings. Compulsory billeting on the wicked people that aren't considered victims of austerity presumably.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 6.10pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Dec 2015 4.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am We were unfavourably hit by the 2008 crisis because our economy is so heavily geared towards finance. We have been favourably blessed by the recovery as it was that sector that has made the biggest adjustment. Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now. However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics. Best stick to football. I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected. No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ? Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme. Only via a warped interpretation of the word. more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes. Oh that's all right then. They would be able to live in their own homes nick, but any spare housing is all rented out to EU citizens exercising their rights to live/work any where in the EU and of course asylum seekers/refugees/economic migrants from the middle east... not to mention hordes of illegal immigrants living here too. But of course that is there right to live here in the UK and we must welcome them with open arms according to lefty/liberal supporters. To try and cope with demand we end up building houses on flood plains and then you lot blame the flood on governmental incompetence and global warming! There are over 600,000 empty homes in the U.K. Considering we are in the top 10 richest countries in the world, having 1 homeless child is unacceptable. Edited by nickgusset (17 Dec 2015 6.11pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 17 Dec 15 6.10pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Dec 2015 4.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.30pm

Quote Stuk at 17 Dec 2015 3.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 Dec 2015 3.04pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Dec 2015 2.31pm

Quote silvertop at 17 Dec 2015 11.52am

Control over public spending has improved or credit rating and is one of many factors that has led to where we are now.

However, the OP stating that the tight budget is the cause of low unemployment does not suggest a very savvy grip on the complexities of economics.

Best stick to football.

I was making the connection between welfare reforms and unemployment figures, which are, in one way or another, connected.

No one can really be against a lower welfare burden and in turn, more tax receipts going to the Exchequer ?

Lower welfare burden = 105,000 homeless children this Christmas (figure from today's Today programme.

Only via a warped interpretation of the word.

more than 103,000 children will spend Christmas in B&Bs, hostels or temporary rented homes.

Oh that's all right then.

There are over 600,000 empty homes in the U.K. Considering we are in the top 10 richest countries in the world, having 1 homeless child is unacceptable.

Edited by nickgusset (17 Dec 2015 6.11pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Austerity Works

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors